Anonymous #1 4w

Then there is no reason to declare the protests in Minneapolis unlawful because they have been nothing but peaceful

0

Anonymous #1 4w

It is quite literally limiting your 1st amendment rights

0

Anonymous lazy_eye 4w

i’m personally of the belief that most of our rights have been under increasing restriction since the turn of the last century. but if we are all gonna play the game then we all need to acknowledge the same rules. and acting like unlawful assembly doesn’t exist is ignoring the rather plainly obvious rules

1

Anonymous #1 4w

I agree that our rights have been under increasing restriction since the turn of the century, that much has been obvious. However, when the rules of a city, state, or federal government contradict the supposedly “highest law in the land” then you might as well live in a land with no law. Just because the rules are obvious does not mean they are moral nor right.

0

Anonymous #2 4w

If you take the parts I highlighted and put them in one sentence you’ll see why that isn’t a valid argument

1

Anonymous lazy_eye 4w

But it is, as there are laws. You just dont have a grasp of law that’s the only conclusion here

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Since I have to spell it out: the 1st amendment says congress will not make a law that abridges the right of the people to peaceably assemble. If you are peaceably assembled then there is no such thing as an unlawful assembly, as guaranteed by the Constitution. In my opinion, it’s unconstitutional for a state to say “we can arbitrarily decide when your protest is over”

1

Anonymous lazy_eye 4w

You’re right and all the lawyers and judges are wrong here’s a cookie 🍪

4

Anonymous #2 4w

Okay buddy

-1