
That’s fine. You can talk about Nambia…but I’m going to assert again that no one even has Nambia in mind when they’re obsessively hate posting about Regan and you know that. It’s the same exact type of behavior that people have when they post about Israel/Palestine or conservatives thinking Hillary Clinton is some satanic criminal mastermind. It’s unserious.
No I don’t though. One of the ppl who do what? Act like he hit my dog? Watch video essays? Definitely not. Despise Regan like everyone with a functioning moral compass? Obviously. And what is the mantra? What does that even mean in this context? Like I said your comment is unhinged dude.
Regan died in fucking 2004 and he was president before you were even fucking alive. It’s about as moronic as having visceral hatred for Winston Churchill or Joesph McCarthy. You are one of those people, but you want to load it as “having a moral compass”. I can sit and say “Yeah, Regan’s policies sucked and we still feel a lot of the fallout from them today” without spazzing the fuck out and being like I HATE REGAN I JUST KNOW HES FUCKING ROTTING IN HELL LIKE THE GHOUL HE IS!
Now you’re trying to crazy-make and gaslight😭 Wild behavior. You know exactly the behavior I’m talking about, you feel personally called out by it because you do exactly the behavior I’m talking about(despite me never even interacting with you), and you tried to use a false dichotomy. The example of Harris is a prime one because any normal ass American wouldn’t consider Harris a moderate conservative and you know that 🤣 You’re just some degen illiberal lefty fuck.
I’m not crazy-making, you’re just acting crazy dude. I’m not called out because I don’t act like you say. And sure people’s knee jerk instinct is to disagree with me about Harris but everyone I’ve ever had a conversation with about it has come around to agree with me within a few minutes. You’re clearly not interested in a rational, evidence-guided discussion though so I’m not going to bother with you.
It’s not a mild disagreement LOL You came in and said “You don’t have a point, crawl off your high horse” when you know exactly what the point I was making, you just didn’t like it 😭 It’s why you had to add that little “despising Regan like everyone with a functioning moral compass”. You say shit and then when you get called out on it, you just avoid it entirely and never say what you mean.
Except it’s more than that. We’re not talking about a simple “Regan sucked. He was a piece of shit because he did A, B, and C.” type of comment. I’m talking about obsessive moral absolutism that offers zero substance outside of political theater. It’s moral signaling to your in-group, not anything substantive. Again…Regan is dead…so I don’t really see the point of wasting time on some dead asshole if it’s anything other than historical analysis.