
Like socialism used to be popular. Those guys in the Appalachians weren’t doing their labor uprisings out of a love for the bootstraps of the mine owners. But I guess the U.S. government needed to make socialism extra scary after the Soviets got power and it worked. And now many Americans think unions are bad.
I brought up Cuba because people oft allege that socialism is the magical form of communism that actually works. They alleged that the real theory has never been tried. Two minutes in that poor country which, in the depths of the depression, its poorest poor were richer than many of the most wealthy in the United States, will dissolve such a delusion. (2/3)
Any “working class solidarity“ would be limited by the actual size of working class, same with the middle class. If neither exist, then neither can their sentiment. For there to be working class or even middle class to support them, there must be work to be done yet where is the industry or agriculture but caught up by the corporations and sold overseas?
(2/3) it is claimed that socialism is magical communism that actually works or hasn’t actually been tried. 3 minutes in Cuba will cure anyone of this sentiment. The absence of “working class solidarity“, across the U.S., but in your Appalachia specifically I imagine has largely been repealed due to the ravaging of the working & middle class, which along w/industry & the family farm, working class solid was sold to the more solidly socialist: PRC
(2/3) it is claimed that socialism is magical communism that actually works or hasn’t actually been tried. 3 minutes in Cuba will cure anyone of this sentiment. The absence of “working class solidarity“, across the U.S., but in your Appalachia specifically I imagine has largely been repealed due to the ravaging of the working & middle class, which along w/industry & the family farm, working class solid was sold to the more solidly socialist: PRC
Not exactly, on the topic of Cuba, just because the United States does not trade with them does not mean it is the fault of the United States that they fail when they have almost 190 other countries could trade with. The strawman of “capitalism” I will not use to suggest that an exchange of goods and specialization of things such as tobacco and sugar game would fix their problem, however, they have open trade with the world, just not the United States.
I wasn’t saying unions shouldn’t exist, however, that doesn’t mean we ought to paint ourselves, red. I would be fully in favor for a small, communist enclave to exist at urban scale somewhere in the United States, so long as it is ideologically, isolated, self-sufficient, and such cancer does not infect the rest of the country. (1/3)
I imagine such “working class solidarity“ appears to have swung away from socialism toward the right and Trump when it has not. It was neither here nor there. Instead, he simply appealed to solidarity of the nation, the nation being that group of people, which had formerly been seen as “working-class solidarity“ and appealed to the libertarian views of those people, nation, or class. For any of these more socialistic refused to be brought back I imagine so would in industry and the family farm.
As I said, Cuba’s economic woes are more about a heavily sanctioned economy which is reliant exclusively on a single cash crop. The same applies for Venezuela with oil. That is why they are not good refutations of socialism. If you’re gonna go after command economies at least use the eastern bloc as your example.
“Capitalism“, is a strawman created by Marx. It is unfortunate that it was adopted as the official brand of the West. I would rather be described as living in a free market Democratic Republic. So yes, it is both against socialism and against the policies of a “capitalist” country. It has hurt people. The people are my concern.