also lets not forget he was for some reason trying to spin it as though people could be victims of bestiality, saying it couldve been involuntary.
like im sorry?
17
Anonymous8w
If only there was an article attached to this headline…
0
👺
Anonymous8w
It was for people who were sex trafficked and forced to do things with animals btw
-3
Anonymous8w
Meanwhile the other side has literal furries lmao
-12
Anonymous#28w
Thanks for extending a job opportunity to them I guess idk
30
AnonymousOP8w
Holy projection lol
-8
Anonymous#28w
What?😭
19
Anonymous#28w
What about them lmao
10
Anonymous#28w
You realize that to protect from what you’re implying furries do, bestiality still needs to be a disqualifying factor? What the fuck was the point of your comment?
19
🏴☠️
Anonymous#28w
Oh y’all have NOTHING, huh?
10
Anonymoustroybolton128w
You’re telling me they got rid of the entire crime of bestiality as a disqualification to be a FED, for like the 2 people in existence who was forced into bestiality and also somehow was arrested for it, and also wants to be a fed.
6
AnonymousOP8w
Do you seriously think that’s what happened? I was joking in my comment but you seriously didn’t read the article wow
2
👺
AnonymousOP8w
Yo it's legit in the first paragraph of the article lmfao
3
Anonymoustroybolton128w
Please we all know this is an appeal to the shitkicker demographic to be a fed lol
1
👺
AnonymousOP8w
I mean the article you linked doesn't agree with you
1
Anonymous#38w
Actually yeah I think this is exactly what happened.
1
Anonymous#108w
That would make sense for someone who didn’t read the article
1
Anonymous#38w
They’re not distinguishing between people who who were coerced or did it on purpose. Let’s be real no one buys this shit
0
Anonymous#18w
You conservatives are CONSTANTLY trying to draw arbitrary lines around sexuality. You cant help what youre attracted too, interspecies sex is entirely natural. Bigot
-2
Anonymous#118w
I’m not buying it, only a handful of white women are THAT woke