Anonymous #1 2w

The fact that nobody has addressed the point is very telling…

1

Anonymous #2 2w

So, said nothing about pedophiles so not really sure how we got there! Maybe read the prompt again? seems like we have comprehension issues idk

-3

Anonymous #3 2w

so when the response has nothing to with the substance I’m not really sure why you felt compelled to reply anyways..

-4

Anonymous #4 2w

Babes, do you not realize by being intolerant of anyone’s beliefs so much so that you resort to calling them a fascist, you are being a fascist? let’s learn some vocabulary, I know it’s a big ask considering the left can’t even define man and woman🤕

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

My response has everything to do with the substance — I am insinuating that your post may be leaving a lot of substance/contextual info out. What was that comment you made about reading comprehension again?

11

Anonymous OP 2w

babes, do you realize that when someone is racist, homophobic, sexist, FASCIST, etc, they deserve to be called out? it's not being intolerant to call people what they are. plus, the second i become "tolerant" if racist, homophobia, sexist, fascist, etc, beliefs, i have lost my humanity

17

Anonymous OP 2w

people with beliefs like yours seem to think that having differing opinions on literal human rights is the same as having differing opinions on what to eat for dinner. between italian and greek, there is no objectively wrong answer. between having beliefs that inherently oppress others and not holding those beliefs, there is an objectively wrong answer. hope this helps!

7

Anonymous OP 2w

Maybe use your brain for the first time since Covid.

11

Anonymous #2 2w

You’re another example of someone projecting imagined negative attributes onto someone in order to oppose them, without actually responding to his point, you create a villain in your mind that doesn’t exist.

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

Is that why you haven’t responded to my comment?

13

Anonymous #1 1w

You’re another example of someone who is enabling serial rapist pedophiles

8

Anonymous #3 1w

You haven’t commented on any of my comments asides from this one. None of your comments were addressed to me

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Oops, that’s my bad :p you’re right, for some reason I thought you were OP

1

Anonymous #4 1w

throwing around words you can’t define when you’re losing an argument doesn’t make you more “humane”.. if you can’t respond without subjecting to Ad Hominem attacks I think it’s time we do some self reflecting. ♡

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

You ignorant fucks meet the definitions of the words.

6

Anonymous #2 1w

Ad Hominem attack! Good job, you’re really proving my point here ♡

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

You never had a point. You’re operating under the assumption that everyone is trying to change your mind and/or win you over. We aren’t. It isn’t an argument. It isn’t a debate. You are a fucking serial rapist pedophile enabler, and I am pointing it out. It isn’t debatable because it’s a fucking fact. Logic isn’t your strong suit. You’re even worse with that than you are with a god damn dictionary.

2

Anonymous OP 1w

you keep saying the same thing over and over without actually responding to what i'm saying. if someone votes for and supports oppressive people they are an oppressor, this is very easy to understand if you aren't completely ignorant.

2

Anonymous #4 1w

i would love for you to respond specifically to the first part of second sentence in this comment :)

5

Anonymous #2 1w

what you said!!

4