Anonymous #1 4w

Please enlighten me with the answer then

0

Anonymous #1 4w

then what is? societal collapse and mass extinction?

5

Anonymous ceo_of_antifa 4w

The answer is localized anarchosocialist communes

0

Anonymous #4 4w

Yes maybe that is a good end goal, but the way to get us there is through a belief in socialism and a proletariat led state

0

Anonymous ceo_of_antifa 4w

There is no perfect answer to the dilemma at hand. I would say right now we elect people into office who are against PACs/not funded by them and other corporate/foreign influence. Of course this is in and of itself difficult because, while some folks may reject PACs, they may also have fringe beliefs that are harmful when put into policy. Again, no perfect answer

1

Anonymous #4 4w

Forced communes severely restricts freedom of movement and freedom to choose a spouse, among many other things that are essential to the nature of man. That would only break down over time

0

Anonymous _orangutan 4w

Making it seem like it’s either revolution or societal collapse and mass extinction isn’t a realistic way to look at it. The best way to change a society (usually) is one step at a time, not a violent overthrow when things don’t go our way. Of course, there are moments that may call for revolution, but the USA certainly isn’t there (yet)

0

Anonymous #1 4w

it quite literally is revolution or societal collapse via climate catastrophe, fascism, and war. agriculture is the basis of human civilization, and we cannot reliably sustain crop yields without water, topsoil, and a good climate to support them, all of which capitalists are selling out from underneath us

2