
i dont know how valid this "study" is but: liberalism tends to stick with modern science and be generally progressive. things are measured to be, but the progressivism has degrees. right wingers, you got joe with a swastika on his forehead, rfk jr saying we should get natural immunity to measles, ron swanson saying less government, stephen miller wanting martial law, and elon musk saying he hates his kids and wants his rockets to use fuel made of poor people
Like for the specific issues they asked about, yes there is more ideological diversity on the right. But that’s not a good thing in this instance. If the question is about whether the earth is round, you want consistency. People being a mix of round and flat earthers instead of just round earthers isn’t a good sign.
a "diversity of thought" is a misleading way to describe anti intellectualism that allows you to believe the earth is 6000 years old, the moon is flat, vaccines are just microchips, tariffs tax the other country somehow. like an insane asylum has a diversity of thought. someone is going through a rough time and somehow got put there, another person has never been attached to reality, living in a made up world
like im sure youve seen the "moral circles heatmap" (i cant get the picture you'd have seen), which gets misinterpreted as liberals care more about stars and trees than their own family, while conservatives actually care about their family and sometimes their community (the farther the red from the center of the circle, the farther from the self they care about)
but the reality is, the heatmap is inclusive. saying you care about your family isn't inclusive of your community, but having said you care about your community, or trees, or the stars DOES include your family. the result of the study was pronounced as liberals care about silly things, but the real result was... alarmingly that conservatives only cared about the people in their immediate proximity. community, country, environment, all to hell to them