Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
We are in hell
42 upvotes, 21 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "We are in hell"
upvote 42 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Does beshear plan on running? I never see him in these polls I’m starting to get worried😭

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

we don’t have any good candidates LOL 🫠

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

There’s been a lot crazier Primary Upsets than 9% or 3%, and we’ve got a lot of time until the primary. I don’t have much hope in someone who isn’t a generic Neolib being nominated, but I would not be surprised if it’s someone who isn’t Newsom or Harris.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Hell is in fact other people.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

These mean nothing when a lot of them likely aren’t even running.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

omfg the midterms haven’t even happened can we stop with this. So much can change in one year

upvote 1 downvote
☝️
Anonymous 2w

idc what anyone says biden was an incredible president American rescue plan Infrastructure bill Chips act IRA bill great appointments “centrist” dems can be pretty effective

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Gimme Buttigieg, Kelly, or Shapiro

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Can’t wait to sit out ANOTHER election 😍‼️

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Fever dream would be AOC but that’s not gonna happen unfortunately

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

they’re calling it the worst lineup in history

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I do love that you’re already conceding before the primary has even begun

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Americans are far too stupid to vote in their own interests

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> aqua_pointing_up56 2w

You’re right. It’s too bad they didn’t campaign on any of that, and instead decided to reheat 2020 Trump’s nachos. All the while publicly refusing to end support for a live streamed genocide.

upvote 11 downvote
☝️
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

because kamala wasn’t joe biden. She didn’t pass the policies. Kamala skirt the line an acceptable way imo for israel. but if isreal was the deciding vote for the election, then why did the pro genocide candidate win. it was just ppl pissed off about the economy and wanted to change.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> aqua_pointing_up56 2w

Is it perhaps possible it was a combination of factors and Gaza was ONE of them?

upvote 12 downvote
☝️
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

is there any reason to think this? it impacted Michigan. but most swing states weren’t heavy on jill stein comparatively. exit polls showed economy was the biggest factor. and everyone i talked when i door knocked pretty much said economy in wisconsin.

upvote 0 downvote
🤲
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Right? I think he would stand a decent chance of winning if he campaigned hard, idk why he never seems on anyone’s radar as a candidate despite constantly being brought up

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> aqua_pointing_up56 2w

The most devastating thing about Gaza was NOT that it flipped would be Kamala voters into voting third party. It was actually that it created a moral dilemma for enough voters that staying home was preferable. Which is why Kamala lost the election. Republicans showed up, Democrats didn’t, this is what happens when you ignore the desires of your base. It’s pretty simple.

upvote 5 downvote
☝️
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

i’m gonna ask again. do you have any reason to think that? I wonder why they played ads attacking kamala for being supportive of Palestine in swing states. I understand if you care about the issue, but everything i have looked it showed not much impact on the election. i see this a lot where it’s “if X just supported my pet issue X would have won” and i think thats a cognitive trap everyone falls into

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 2w

Presidential candidates begin to do stuff around midterms, that’s pretty normal. Especially because this cycle is so important and last cycle the dems basically just threw Kamala in without a primary, it will be imperative that dems start shoring support for a candidate soon so people can get to know/support them

upvote 1 downvote