exactly

6

Anonymous #3 19h

“I don’t believe you” *offers no proof whatsoever to the contrary*

14

Anonymous #4 17h

This is Yikyak. I am not required to explain anything. Especially when you’re discourteous about it.

-3

Anonymous #3 17h

This is Yikyak. You should be prepared for responses to your nothingburger comments

3

Anonymous #3 17h

Not required, but would be good to explain since you’re wrong

9

Anonymous #4 15h

I am. I’m just now disincentivized to provide you what you’re requesting due to the manner you phrased the request. You’ve given me a choice, regardless of the points, to illustrate how powerless you are to get what you’re requesting or… cave? I won’t like there is a large part of me that does desire to bridge the gap and create some sort of mutual understanding, but seeing no courtesy on your end of the metaphorical bridge. I figure I’ll opt out of putting any more effort than narrating.

-2

Anonymous #3 15h

Lots of big words in this paragraph, but still no accountability or admitting that you are just flat out wrong.

6

Anonymous #5 1h

And how many of those things 1. Actually happened, and 2. Aren’t from an unbiased and incorrect news source?

1

Anonymous #5 1h

Yall will literally read a headline and think it’s the most accurate thing in the world

1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous OP 1h

There's no such thing as an unbiased news source, but these are real events. If you'd rather bury your head in the sand and deny something that's happened again and again, I can't help you.

0

But there are such things as biased news sources that don’t utilize their full potential to report truth. Maybe you should join nascar and drift a little to the left instead of being so far right your hand gets stuck at a 45 degree angle.

1

Anonymous #5 1h

There’s so much proof that DEI did more good than harm and that removing DEI harms astronomically

1

Anonymous #3 1h

Literally nothing I said was “discourteous.” But sure, keep rambling

1

Anonymous OP 1h

Moot point, as these are all true. It’s incredible that you think anyone who fact checks you must be on the right.

0

Anonymous #5 1h

Did you even read past ANY of the headlines you screenshotted?

1

Anonymous #5 1h

Again, read past them and you’ll see that these are events that are on a scale smaller than your last remaining brain cell

1

Anonymous OP 1h

Thats an entirely different argument. It really depends on which policies you’re referring to.

0

Anonymous #5 1h

It’s not.

1

Anonymous OP 1h

“This never happened” *multiple examples of it happening* “Well it didn’t happen on a significant scale according to me”

1

Anonymous #5 1h

You’re missing my whole point. But that’s ok. I underestimated how much you care about having an actual discourse instead of pretending you’re right (after giving sources that you didn’t read)

1