Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 1d
3 upvotes, 24 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics.
comment

24
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

“AI can’t replace manual labor” Oh the arrogance lol. Machines have been gradually displacing manual labor for hundreds of years. The capitalists aren’t sparing you guys. What’s unique is that with AI it’s impacting non-manual labor for the first time.

upvote 24 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

“AI can’t replace manual labor” Guys never heard of robotics, I guess. There will be over 50,000 dextrous robots with onboard AI in American homes ten years from now.

upvote 14 downvote
🦓
Anonymous 22h

The Tesla bots will replace every job. 30,000 hours of labor for $30,000

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

AI absolutely can replace manual labor

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

Liberals seethe when you mention blue collar lol. They can’t handle masculinity

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 1d

“Go into the trades that way you can become a bourgeois parasite by trading in capital instead of labor someday.”

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

What are the humanoid robots that the same AI companies are developing supposed to do then?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

I'll just buy a few tools and have AI guide me through everything

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

Also telling people it’s just easy peasy to get one of these professions and it’s an instant rich scheme lol. If it was, everyone would be a tradesman.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 21h

Bourgeois parasite is when making a living

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #8 18h

If you’re making your money by “investing in real estate” then yes, that’s parasitism and you’re not actually making a living, just taking from someone else’s.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

Oh look, an AI dumbo who wants to be a slave

upvote 1 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

Liberals are by definition aligned with capital over labor. That’s easier to stomach when you only think about white collar labor because the work is more easily separated from its productivity (and therefore its value). They can only ignore the rights of the manual worker by degrading him as a person and continually denying his equal standing with his fellow-workers in the white collar world.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

I don’t know how the fuck you could read my comment and think it’s pro-ai

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

Oh I like labor. That’s why I’m a socialist, not a liberal ;)

upvote 4 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 17h

I see the liberals are out in force today 🙄

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 17h

The only way to legally make money is get it from someone else in a voluntary transaction

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #8 17h

Did I say anything about law?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 17h

No but tbf you’re not saying much of substance

upvote 1 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #8 17h

Wealth should come from labor, not capital. Wealth that arises from capital is not legitimate and is a form of parasitism. That’s what I’m saying here.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 16h

In your opinion maybe

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #8 16h

Yes, I am expressing my opinion. You have developed a firm grasp of the situation.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 16h

It’s confusing because you keep asserting it as fact

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #8 16h

I asserted the truth of a thing I believe is true, yes. That shouldn’t be confusing.

upvote 0 downvote