Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
*says the the OP is being misleading and dishonest* *immediately responds by using equally misleading and dishonest numbers reported by nobody except Facebook and Yahoo*
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
Just so misleading and dishonest. You do realize the Biden administration spent more on steaks…?
-2 upvote, 1 comment. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Just so misleading and dishonest. You do realize the Biden administration spent more on steaks…?"
comment

8
upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

This was another post I had made earlier addressing how misleading the original post was. My point in highlighting the fact that Biden spent more on ribeyes was to demonstrate how indoctrinated these people are. It’s an issue when trump does it right? But I guarantee you didn’t know Biden did the same, if not worse. The definition of indoctrination, pushing an idea uncritically, while excluding opposing beliefs.

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Are you trying to say there wasn’t overspending under biden or you dont think the numbers are exactly right?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Then disprove them, same way I did to the original claim. They were claiming that our monthly spending was 3,321% higher than it actually was. Just straight bullshit.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

You “disproved” them by using ChatGPT to claim that Biden spent more on steak which is also not supported by reliable sources. Two wrongs don’t make a right, dude.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/jan/14/pentagon-year-end-spending-spree-excess-33-billion/#:~:text=In%20just%20the%20final%20five,$16.6%20million%20on%20ribeye%20steak Washington times says the day figure of $16.6 million. Well shiiii would you look at that I was correct.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Same**

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

you’re talking about 16m when the original claim was about roughly 93bil by this admin? The fuck? even if you’re right, how tf does that help in any case, or is it just intended to redirect attention?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

My point is that if you’re gonna argue with someone’s claims, you won’t look reliable at all if you use fkin ChatGPT. I am of the opinion that the numbers for both administrations are inflated and are being used facetiously

upvote 1 downvote