Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
These photos are probably murder trophies that they took to savor the killings
227 upvotes, 45 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in True Crime. "These photos are probably murder trophies that they took to savor the killings"
upvote 227 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

i genuinely denied going to my white best friends birthday party yesterday because i would’ve been the only black person there, these cases are racially motivated and no one can say otherwise.

upvote 34 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

I recognize the bottom pic but I don't know the top one. What case is that?

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

There are so many racist and enabling white people in the comments like oml take a sociology class

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

You know nothing about his case. Stop spreading conspiracies

upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 10w

Nolan Wells

upvote 49 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

oh shit that's new new. People are so evil man wtf

upvote 51 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 10w

wait what’s the bottom pic?

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 10w

Tamla Horsford. Rotten Mango did a few episodes on it.

upvote 60 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

The fact that this post has 200 upvotes is disturbing

upvote -16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

Someone sounds desperate to hide the motives of racist murderers who colluded with law enforcement to cover up their crimes

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

What’s disturbing is your defense of racist murderers who colluded with law enforcement to cover up their crimes

upvote 54 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

Someone sounds desperate to jump to conspiracies and conclusions that dont align with evidence because it makes them feel like they’re playing detective

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

Your proof? 0

upvote -11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

They do align with evidence, and they also align with a pattern we’ve seen since the founding of the United States of America lmao And whoever downvoted you ate😍

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 10w

stay safe babes

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 10w

You are delusional

upvote -12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

The nolan wells case literally just happened and these kids were his friends. If you’re ready to call these random ppl murderers based on nothing then you’re nutty

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 10w

I’m sure you would’ve said the same thing to Wells😭

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 10w

you’d be the delusional one if you don’t see what’s going on in the world

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 10w

My friends also steal my phone and leave me on and island and would make no attempt to uncover the truth should I be found dead right after they were with me

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 10w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

Of course you’re one to believe the group of “friends.” And he also died. As one does.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

“I didn’t go to my friends birthday because they and everyone else has the same skin color as this group of people who may or may not murderer someone with my skin color” that is legit a brain dead take bro. Should I stop hanging out with black friends because of Irynia or? I’ll give you a hint. No, because I’m better than you. But go ahead and live your life in fear, go to the other side of the street when you see a white baby in a cradle LOL.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

You thinking that’s a valid comparison tells me the answer is a RESOUNDING yes. Your black friends aren’t safe around you

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Nah you’re just a psychotic racist who hides behind skin color and history to treat immeasurable groups of people like garbage because it’s easier to hate than to think.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

That’s a lot of words to say you think the world revolves around you lmao

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Didn’t know you were so afraid of babies

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

You’re not a baby, and neither are the murderers in the picture

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

You said white people, never said anything else so…

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

are you okay?…

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

I didn’t “say white people,” actually. Still acting like we’re talking about babies only goes to show you being desperate to distort an argument by being intentionally(?) stupid to reflexively defend your narcissistic wound that is activated when racism and violence against black people is addressed. Seek help

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Right. You are stepping in for someone else lol, okay 👌. The other person did not want to go to the party because they fear people with a particular skin color. Babies have skin color. I guarantee nothing will happen. You’re just fearmongering.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Oh and I’m sure you also think it’s fearmongering when a woman says she doesn’t feel safe going jogging at night alone or when a child says a Catholic priest makes them uncomfortable lmao

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

There isn’t even an argument to begin with. Just peddling racial wars

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

And women are peddling gender wars

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Women feel safer jogging alone in places where there is not a danger of people with particular behaviors. If you’re going off of immutable characteristics, you’ve already failed

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

I never said that lol. Look at you, accused me of doing the very thing you’re doing.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

“Where there is not a danger of particular behaviors” lol what? They know the place they’re in is safe enough to jog alone at night how exactly?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

If their area has a high risk then yeah. A suburban neighborhood is going to be safer than the creepy alleyway

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

As someone commenting in the true crime community, you should know murders do happen in suburbia…

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

I could care less about what the community is. Safer doesn’t mean 100% nothing happens, you know? And I can even add that some neighborhoods have lower crime rates than others, and some alleyways don’t see as much action either. Why is it that when someone says “safer” or “better” you think they mean 100%?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

So you know it’s never wise for a woman to go jogging alone at night because “safer” is never 100%, and it’s a situation she could be in danger in, which we know from historical and contemporary data. Likewise, being alone with a group of whites when you’re black is similarly unsafe, which we know from historical and contemporary data. Next

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Right, but if you live that way you are miserable. Your large scale data is effectively useless, also. You should only care about local areas, because that is what concerns your jog. Likewise, if your “white friends” have had no personal issues of aggression and hatred, there is no justification for your fear.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

The way everything you said is wrong is sending me: -people who live that way are fine -“large scale” (whatever tf that means) is comprised of anecdotal data, e.g. the jogs -very odd you say this given Wells’s friends swear up and down they had no personal issue or aggression, and yet here we are…

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

We’ll have to see how the ruling goes. In the meantime, people can lie, and the truth can be revealed through friends and such, or psychological examination, etc. 1) people who live that way think they are fine because they are out of touch in the same way I would think I live fine when you would say I am out of touch. 2) there is general situational hierarchy which is that the personal supersedes everything. Meaning, if there is some statistic for a demographic that says high crime or smth,

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

you can’t immediately justify a response to that if there is no indication in the person. For example, how someone behaves, acts, speaks, can reveal someone’s nature. You can believe in a statistic in hindsight, but if you know the person use that, and if you know the area use that and the indications.

upvote -2 downvote