Anonymous #1 11w

Being angered by the unhinged parasocial fan club around this trial does not make me one of them

18

Anonymous OP 11w

It does, though.

-10

Anonymous #2 11w

He was looked at as a suspect tf? They literally have evidence that he wasn’t even home because she sent him away. Oh and she admitted to doing it. Also she could not have gotten more support. Multiple doctors and prescriptions, a husband that worked from home, and a NANNY! That’s a hell of a lot more than most people and if that wasn’t enough then I don’t know what is. Some people are simply evil just because she’s a woman doesn’t change that. She should never see the light of day again

7

Anonymous #2 11w

Not tried ≠ not investigated

11

Anonymous #3 11w

She couldnt talk when the paramedics got there, who did she talk to and say she did it? Ohh her husband. Her husband who worked from home also took week long trips to go see his mistress all the time and moved on so soon after. Youre actually braindead if youre supporting that man. He was clearly planning on her dying too after he killed those poor kids. And they dont clearly have evidence he wasnt home if the murders happened earlier than HE reported.

-6

Anonymous #2 11w

Jesus Christ get off of TikTok. Your fan fic is nothing more than that

11

Anonymous #3 11w

Youre literally doing the first thing i said. Just itching to blame a woman. You get literally nothing out of being die hard for Patrick Clancy. If you cant accept that maybe theres some nuance with it and a lot of weird stuff thats going on i literally cant help you i can just tell you to get a life.

-8

Anonymous #2 9w

What the fuck is wrong with you. Okay sure let’s agree her husband is an asshole and was avoidant. In what universe does that make it okay for her to kill her kids. Because she didn’t get help?? Why is it up to her husband to get her help?

5

Anonymous #2 9w

im almost always on the feminist side of these debates but girl she 100% did it. i do think she was in psychosis though. and i think her husband and maybe even psychiatrist are slightly to blame (emotionally, not legally) for being fully capable of recognizing the signs and not really helping

9

Anonymous #7 9w

Her psychiatrist needs to lose their license

7

Anonymous #5 9w

Hey so i literally didnt say it was okay. I said she deserves time if she did do it but theres clearly deep underlying issues, its not like she just killed her kids to do it. And yes it is up to her HUSBAND the man she MARRIED to get her help if shes struggling mentally after having HIS kids. So heres a new concept, if you marry someone you are literally legally agreeing to help them through everything and as YOU said he didnt and if she did kill those kids it was a product of his neglect.

4

Anonymous #4 9w

She literally could not have done it

3

Anonymous #8 9w

According to who?

9

Anonymous #8 9w

You are a delusional fool. There is literally no question as to if she did it. That isn’t even what is in question.

10

Anonymous #4 9w

Have you watch the trial? Nothing makes sense.

-3

Anonymous #1 9w

Well clearly the jury seems to be just as “delusional” as me. Just wait until she is cleared.

4

Anonymous #8 9w

Yes I have. There is no other possible person who could have committed the crimes other than the woman who was at home with the 3 children who ended up dead. And even she admits it. That’s why she’s trying to sue her doctors

12

Anonymous OP 9w

Well clearly he wasn’t investigated well enough. They had her in cuffs less than 48 hours later, she had no memory of anything other than what Patrick Clancy told her that she did.

5

Anonymous #4 9w

Patrick

0

Anonymous #8 9w

You mean the man who was proven to be outside of the house based on CCTV footage? Right

12

Anonymous #8 9w

They aren’t deliberating on whether or not she ended their lives. They’re debating on whether or not she is criminally responsible, dumbass. Her attorneys even acknowledge that she did it. In court. On the record.

9

Anonymous #4 9w

He was outside of the house. After he killed them and threw her out the window. It’s actually funny you mention the CC tv footage because there’s a moment where he’s clearly handing someone else Lindsay’s Apple Watch while in the CVS.

0

Anonymous #8 9w

You might be the dumbest person on the entire internet.

16

Anonymous #8 9w

You’re actually dumb if you believe made up facts over real evidence. I’m not arguing with stupid

7

Anonymous #4 9w

Her. Own. Attorneys. Said. She. Strangled. Them. To. Death.

4

Anonymous #1 9w

Yeah I agree we’re on the same side here

3

Anonymous #8 9w

No wonder “nothing makes sense” to you. 😂

2

Anonymous #1 9w

He has never directly stated that, and in his closing he said that there wasn’t an adequate investigation

-2

Anonymous #1 9w

And if the prosecution has shown that she committed the murders beyond reasonable doubt

-1

Anonymous #8 9w

So if Patrick apparently did it before leaving the house, how’d he get her to answer the phone while he was at rite aid? Did he leave the phone with her and tell her to pick up to cover his tracks? Do you see how ridiculous the notion sounds? Also her Apple Watch data proved the watch to be at the house the entire day. But you must’ve missed that day of trial and came up with your own storyline

1

Anonymous #4 9w

the theory is that he wasnt the one at one of the locations, that he had his friend (who looks like him) go there to backup his story

2

Anonymous #7 9w

So that’s more believable than CCTV footage, phone data, Apple Watch data, and her own confessions? 🫩

9

Anonymous #4 9w

lemme first say that i think she did it but… i did just look into what data they have. apparently they never presented any information in court about patricks phone or apple watch locations. ALL they have is that he called her for 14 seconds, and the CCTV footage. they never tracked his phone or watch, only hers.

6

Anonymous #4 9w

but what i was saying before is that the theory is that one of the guys in tbe CCTV footage was patricks best friend. which would mean there is absolutely no exonerating evidence (at least among what was brought to court)

4