Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Survivor icon
Survivor 21h
Jonathan wasn’t robbed and he’s throwing temper tantrums in his exit press xoxoxo
comment

4
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 20h

Anyone who says he was robbed doesn’t understand that jury management is the biggest part of a winning game and it’s not something you can just look past. The jury IS the game.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 14h

The thing is I do get him being upset bc I’d sure as hell be sad about being so close and losing $2M but the way he’s bashing ppl on the jury and blaming others is soooo annoying to me and what I don’t like. Joe on the other hand has been nothing but graceful & only blaming himself so I respect it

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 20h

Also I have a running theory that Survivor hates female winners, and almost every single time a woman wins, the show gives the winner a half-assed edit while giving a man who makes it to the end a complete edit to make it seem like the man should’ve won over the woman. If you’ve ever watched a season and felt like some important parts of the story aren’t being told, that’s usually why.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 20h

They’ve done this almost every single time a woman wins, unless no men make it near the end (like Micronesia or One World)— then the winner gets a good edit. Some examples are Tina and Colby, Jenna and Rob C, Amber and Boston Rob, Natalie and Russell, Sophie and Coach, Erika and Xander, Maryanne and Mike, Kenzie and Charlie, and now Aubry and Jonathan. The list goes on. But they almost never do this to male winners. The show WANTS us to look down on female winners

upvote 6 downvote