oh fuck you. the picture of the groupchat of men saying “free pussy” and “you can just walk in and whip it out” isn’t enough??

12

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #1 23h

dawgs you can’t just downvote mv bc i want a source for things in the internet jfc yall are cooked

5

even if she did “consent” you can not give valid consent while drunk. thats RAPE. she was obviously very traumatized and did not speak to a professional in interviewing people in situations like hers. she was also hungover from the drinks and ket hello??? obviously the original story is going to be fuzzy ong we need to drag people like you behind cars 🙏

12

Comment Deleted

0

lmao im sorry this hurt your feelings so much rape supporter. i think its insanely funny in a very pathetic way that you’re so confident about being wrong. you can change your statement at any time and it makes sense that she would not initially remember the events of the night correctly. this does in fact hold in court

3

and can i see your credentials since you know the process so well? 😇

4

Comment Deleted

0

as soon as you can lift your atrophied flabby arms off your keyboard lol

1

Comment Deleted

0

take a few deep breaths in before you burst something

4

Comment Deleted

0

i think people who support rape should be harmed, it’s not like that is an insane viewpoint to have.

1

Anonymous #1 19h

yall genuinely suck

11

Anonymous #6 18h

i think its a little reductive to see this as political pawning, i see it more as a wake-up call. this tragedy is the result of an institutional failure, and our institutions have been looking at the wrong things. this post is making an illustration of that.

6

Anonymous #1 18h

Cry. Cry harder.

-8

Anonymous #7 17h

As if “there’s more white men” wasn’t reductive?

-1

Anonymous #6 17h

that wasn’t reductive, that was on the nose. of all groups of people, who reaps the most benefits from said institutional failures? additionally, who would reap the most benefits from the maintenance of them?

3

Anonymous OP 16h

homie you’re the one downvoting someone ON YOUR SIDE because they asked for a source, something we all should support being the standard. ain’t my fault yall are cooked. marx is rolling in his grave at this working class

5

Anonymous #1 16h

marx probably wouldve said “damn a nigga dont got google or sumn?”

10

Anonymous #8 16h

One group raped a woman for an entire work day another group might throw a ball harder

7

Anonymous #7 16h

i’m glad you asked! i tried! google it and lmk bc it doesn’t exist.

1

Anonymous #1 15h

i didnt ask you silly, i said marx prlly wouldve. there is indeed no exact statistic, nor could their rlly be bc for a plethora of safety concerns. however, while i dont know a single soul who can name 7 trans athletes, i lost count of how many know or have been victimized by a perpetrator of SA. that’s the point of the post, and i feel like you understood that so thats why im joshing ya

7

Anonymous #7 15h

I understand the point like I made clear in my original comment. But given the wording of the OP I was simply curious about any actual source for the “fact.” Even though yes, the fact is probably true.

0

Anonymous #1 15h

aint no harm in asking for a source🤷‍♀️ tho the insistence on a question you already knew the answer to came off as waiting for a gotcha moment from an outsider perspective tbh, and the defeatist “yall are cooked” kinda reinforced that. your intentions couldve been cleared by a simple question tho n i dont think its fair for you to be as antagonized as you’ve been

7

Anonymous #7 12h

I didn’t keep insisting on any question, and I did not know the answer! That’s is why I asked :) If you interpreted me saying that I agree with the point as me being an outsider that is on you. Me being annoyed that fellow leftists are pissy about me asking a source, and you interpreting it that way is also on you. I’ll be antagonized as I want to when people who should be my allies get mad at me for wanting a source thank you very much. In short- making assumptions makes an ass out of u

0

Anonymous #1 10h

the first links on google regarding trans NCAA athletes is a journal post that mentioned the “less than 10 trans people in sports” as well as the factcheck that refutes it. if u searched it then u definitely must’ve seen it, which is where the presumption came from. considering you mentioned already searching it, that conclusion doesnt seem that out there (tho i dont agree w it)

1

Anonymous #1 10h

with that said, ur last comment is absolutely valid. everyone presumes the worst of eachother these days and all of us have some work to do in regards to that. i also didnt intend to make an unnecessary enemy out of you if that’s how you perceive my comments, i just found how you were getting downvoted with nobody starting conversation around it absurd (and the switchup is also crazy).

1

Anonymous #7 10h

10>7. which is why i asked. and yes, the downvote with no one starting conversation about it was ridiculous. i have no idea what switch up you mean.

0

Anonymous #1 10h

i was referring to the switch in votes once our conversation actually started, ur original comments were initially in the negatives when i first replied even tho u explicitly said u agreed😭

1

Anonymous #1 10h

but to actually give u an answer: this post is based off of the frequency of people encountering these two issues*. with trans people being less than 1% of the population (let alone athletes) and 1 in 14 men being offenders (NSVRC), which would u be more likely to encounter on a campus?

1

Anonymous #7 9h

like i said. i’m aware of the POINT behind the fact but the fact isn’t truly a verifiable fact

0

Anonymous #1 9h

the post is rhetorical which we've already concluded, and if your frustration is with the loose use of the word "fact" then alright, but i just illustrated how the math necessary to verify the fact that ur more likely to encounter one vs the other... that wasnt a hypothetical, you'd statistically be more likely to encounter an offender on a single campus than a t-college athlete period. thats the base.

1

Anonymous #7 9h

yes i already said i understood that from the get go you didn’t “illustrate anything” i was curious as to if OP had a source. they did not. the end.

0

Anonymous #1 8h

well, now i must ask after all this yapping, what do you take away from not having what you consider to be a source? was your strife with the use of the word “fact?” your initial question was “what’s is this based off of,” to which i used the NSVRC, NCAA and the 2025 census to answer. the t-athlete stat cant be verified to the degree you seek, but do u find the extent to which it can insufficient?

1