
I’m all for questioning and being skeptical, especially with things nowadays, but I don’t get it. We wouldn’t be able to post things rn if it wasn’t for our satellites. How can we have such technological advancements if the moon landing was faked. Faking something like that seems more complicated than going to the moon
like my dad’s always been a conspiracy nut (moon landing faked, 9/11 inside job, the works) and he flirted with flat-earth shit for a while, and I think he dropped it because there was no “why” to it. Every other major conspiracy theory has a motive for the supposed conspirators. Faking the moon landing to bankrupt the Soviets, doing 9/11 as a false flag to justify war in the Middle East, these things have motives for the conspirators. Flat eartherism just kinda doesn’t lmao
My take is that the moon landing was real, and 9/11 was committed by Al Qaeda, but the US government knew about it and could’ve stopped it, and chose not to because they wanted to go to war over there anyways. I have no doubt that the US government would *let* it happen for their own gain, but all the evidence of an inside job is flimsy as hell.
I mean, Al-Qaeda being born out of the Mujihadeen, who the USA backed in their Holy War against the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, is an objective reality. I think the CIA knew Al-Qaeda was gonna do it, and they didn’t stop it because war in the Middle East was gonna serve US interests.