Anonymous #1 8w

Satan bless

20

Anonymous #5 8w

Jesus is basicaly the easter bunny for adults and he doesn't even have free candy

10

Anonymous OP 8w

Any historian worth their salt acknowledges Jesus was a real person. Historians at the time like Tacitus acknowledge His miracles. So you are grossly underestimating who Jesus is

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

He was a real guy, but y’all are some fools if you believe in magic just because a 2000-year-old storybook says it’s real.

19

Anonymous #1 8w

There are literal historical accounts from non Christians acknowledging his works that are outside of the bible. Jesus is more well documented than Alexander the Great.

-1

Anonymous #5 8w

I acknowledge he’s a real person I just don’t believe he’s god

11

Anonymous #8 8w

Sure he’s documented as a man, but show me one piece of evidence that supports his supernatural abilities. You can’t

9

Anonymous #1 8w

You literally can just don’t be intellectually dishonest and do your research. If there’s an underlying moral issue than that’s another thing.

-3

Anonymous #1 8w

Not sure how you can be a fool one countless evidence supports Jesus being God. What evidence are you looking for?

-4

Anonymous #7 8w

Why not

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

Because respectfully, I don’t believe in the Bible because I don’t believe a god who claims to be loving could sentence people to burn for simply not believing but in the same breath would let Hitler into heaven if he confessed his sins, but also because in the Bible he orders them to kill children and babies I don’t believe a god who’s full of love would advocate for genocide, but as for Jesus there’s no written proof outside of the Bible that he did those things I respect religious freedom

15

Anonymous #7 8w

And you can worship who you want but I simply can’t

11

Anonymous #7 8w

Preach

6

Anonymous #7 8w

This screams you don’t understand the Bible. If this was the reality no one would follow. You didn’t even provide any scripture to back up your claims. So do that first

-3

Anonymous #5 8w

Samuel 15:3 mark 16:16 Both are verses that provide clear meanings to what I'm saying

9

Anonymous #7 8w

My dad was a pastor so I do understand what I’m saying.

11

Anonymous #7 8w

Appeal to authority isn’t going to work on me, it’s a logical fallacy. You’re assuming 1 Samuel 15 proves God is cruel and unworthy of worship. But if God is the Creator, has authority over life, waited centuries before judging Amalek, and acted in judgment rather than arbitrary violence, why is your interpretation more reasonable than understanding it as divine justice? Centuries is plenty of time to judge. Also, mark 16:16 doesn’t apply to what your claiming

-2

Anonymous #5 8w

But he ordered them to kill children which is exactly what he used as reasoning to say the cannanites were evil but also does the bible not say though shall not kill how could you say an infants life deserves to be snuffed out what sin could that child have done

10

Anonymous #7 8w

Other then exist in the culture of their parents which means god ordered a genocide against kids who’s only crime was existing

10

Anonymous #7 8w

My point is that if God is the Creator and perfectly just, then He has authority over life and death that humans do not. Your objection assumes that if God ends a child’s earthly life, He must be acting unjustly. But why? If God is the Creator, on what basis are you saying He has no authority over the length of a human life?

-1

Anonymous #5 8w

What I think you’re missing out is that when Adam and Eve rebelled against god, they introduced sin into the world viva satan (who rebelled against god in the heavens cause bro hated humans hence setting them/us up for failure tricking Adam and Eve) through that we all were born into a cursed world with a readiness to sin factor (murderers are a thing, natural disasters and diseases etc) so that’s why evil stuff happens. God does intervene and chooses to not intervene at times

0

Anonymous #8 8w

But we cannot assume gods purpose or intentions because that would be us claiming we know more than him that and/or we are more just or more moral than God. God being the just and the good, claiming we know better which is obviously not true.

0