
Itās not. Youāre just more aware of the world around you and youāre seeing these things, really, for the first time. This is what early adulthood is like. Plus, you have media outlets who donāt actually report the news now, so all we ever see is the worst of the worst. Thereās a lot of good out there. You just have to look for it
I mean the black president thing doesnāt really matter given we watched these same people make dolls lynching him and continue to make bigoted jokes about him and his family during and after his presidency. Ntm the country has a tendency to swing in favor of whatever party has the most apparent power at that given point
But youāre also seeing a world that is tired of being played for fools by those in power. When the government tries to tell you what you can/canāt do, thereās a problem. Again, itās all about what youāre getting fed by the media. One US president isnāt going to set the world on fire when all the world has to do is ignore him bc heās a child. This is part of growing up (getting older). You actually understand the things you were taught as a child and can apply them to real world consequences
Oh heās fs great at stoking tensions and just going crazy with some really outlandish things sometimes (Trump), but globally, a lot of the issues are unhappy people and oppressive govts /: A lot of people donāt understand the oppression Spain has enacted on N. African enclaves Ceuta and Melilla in Morocco (asylum seekers, it got violent, Spain covered it up) just as an example. Itās not talked about & has no correlation to the US, but it goes to show that instability is largely defined by regn
In Iran, for example, ppl were unhappy with the former Ayatollah after he took power in ā79 Trump certainly has influenced the MidEast in both terms, but people are unhappy bc of poor economic conditions, lack of personal expression and freedom, lack of access to education for women⦠But thatās always been a volatile region out there. The EU is also dealing with mass immigration and people they canāt vet the identity of and citizens of those who deal with it are afraid of cultural changesā¦
#11 is correct. Tackling racism was something Obama attempted. It wasnāt revealed until nearly 6 years after he was out of office that social media sites were targeted to selectively promote and censure US citizens. Another government initiative that started noble, but by the end ⦠it wasnāt. It was a form of Jawboning (word of the day).
and again⦠thereās been 2 presidents and 3 terms since then⦠they couldāve changed it. and on another personal note, as a black woman, i saw and experienced way less racism when obama was in office. at the end of the day, america selected an openly racist president, not once but TWICE, which makes ppl think itās okay to be openly racist now
Exactly. I wasnāt saying Obama was the only president to use Jawboning, just that what 11 said was correct. These groups are as tight knit as they are now BECAUSE Obama accidentally pushed them together. If you canāt speak freely somewhere, most people go find somewhere else to talk, or band together to get rid of the restrictions. Humans are pack animals after all.
Another example of jawboning social media platforms was during the covid pandemic. The lab leak theory isnāt a theory anymore, it was confirmed as the source of the virus. But suggesting it was possible wasnāt allowed on social media at the time BECAUSE of jawboning. Its how you got that one clip of John Stewart going nuts
Itās because of how the data gets recorded. The standard is set by the Office of Management and Budget and the FBI follows that standard and thats where every study gets their data from. Arab gets classified as white so the Pulse nightclub shooting for example counts as a hate crime by a white person.