Anonymous #1 2w

Horrible bait

26

Anonymous #2 2w

If you gotta ask for proof in 2026 you’realready too far gone

14

Anonymous #1 2w

Factual

5

Anonymous OP 2w

I asked for proof I’m uninformed so show me proof

6

Anonymous #2 2w

Google it buddy and tell me what you find

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Everyone here knows you’re uninformed. Put in the work and correct yourself if you already know you are.

4

Anonymous OP 2w

Y’all are clones you ALL fail to give proof EVERYONE OF YOU😭

0

Anonymous #2 2w

With climate change we’ve noticed that the jet stream is becoming wavier. We’re not 100% sure why this is happening, but scientists have suggested it’s because the arctic is warming much faster than the rest of the world (something we’ve observed) and the imbalances in temperature are making the jet stream wavier

5

Anonymous #2 2w

A wavier jet stream brings very warm air farther north and also brings very cold air farther south, which is why the US is having a huge ice storm rn

1

Anonymous #2 2w

It won’t let me reply to your comment with a picture, but if you look at the picture in my other comment hopefully it helps make more sense

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Also another note, this is partly why they change the name from “global warming” to “climate change”

2

Anonymous #4 2w

There are things we don’t know and won’t know about how things operate. I work with audio and to me that looks similar to a sine wave, when you have two sine waves one with reversed polarity and the other normal, you get no playback. So are they not equaling each other out? Also it’s the same graph that someone drew lines over…if this were true the “weather marks” would be in different areas. Don’t let the government spread fear. God is in control. And if you don’t believe it that’s okay.

0

Anonymous #2 2w

The author of the paper drew lines over it to show how the jet stream changes with warming in the arctic. The “sine wave” you’re talking about is an air current. First: just because it looks like a sine wave on paper does not mean it is a sine wave and behaves like a sine wave. Second: air currents do not cancel each other out like sine waves. Third: the jet stream waves shown in the picture are not happening at the same time, so they would not “cancel each other out” if that was even possible.

3

Anonymous #2 2w

If you read the figure caption, you’ll see that the two pictures are showing the configuration of the jet stream under different conditions. The jet stream configuration is always changing and those two configurations would not be happening at the same time because the jet stream is one thing. You should read the paper and maybe that will help you understand

4

Anonymous #2 2w

Dog it’s pretty simple argument procedure that if you have an inferior, competing idea the burden of providing proof is on you. 99% of scientists agree on human caused climate and the evidence is slammed in your face every day. If you have some sort of magical information that contracts all that, provide it. Cause that’s a hell of a lot harder to find

5

Anonymous #4 2w

Not really why the name was changed to climate change but ok

0

Anonymous #3 2w

-IQ

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Asking for proof of climate change in 2026 is like asking for proof the earth isn’t flat. People aren’t gonna waste their time trying to bring someone’s head out of their ass when it’s clearly in there by choice.

5

Anonymous #4 2w

I never said it IS a sine wave because above isn’t sound…but it works the same way like tree roots, veins, branches, those all look the same and carry life it’s the same way the sine wave works like the photo, if the air moves opposite of what it did then the other air goes to where it didn’t before therefore equalizing.

0

Anonymous OP 2w

There are multiple reasons which is why I specified “partly”. The term climate change was adopted because there are many changes happening to the climate, not just warming. Can you explain to me why you think the name was changed?

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Do you know what a jet stream is

1

Anonymous #2 2w

You’re claiming that if air is moving in the opposite direction, it would cancel out. In the figure, both air currents are moving from west to east and they do not coexist at the same time, so it is impossible for them to cancel each other out. There is no air moving in the opposite direction because the figure is showing the same jet stream and how it changes under different conditions. Just because things look alike, does not mean the behave in the same way.

1

Anonymous #4 2w

You’re not understanding what I’m saying and that’s okay

1

Anonymous #2 2w

You don’t understand how air currents work and that’s okay

1

Anonymous #4 2w

Yup what goes around the earth comes around the earth. Simple. No need to be rude.

1

Anonymous #2 2w

I just said what you said

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Still believing in the climate change hoax pushed for the past 30 years is like still believing in Santa clause. The rest of us figured it out when we turned 8-10yo.

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Bro you actually gotta be trolling because there’s no way you just compared climate change to Santa clause. Actually the stupidest thing I’ve ever read on here and that’s saying something

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Your post is the dumbest thing I’ve seen on here. You can admit you still suck your thumb little baby climate change boy.

-2

Anonymous #3 2w

Thank you for proving my point you have a -IQ👍🏻

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Ironically your meme game is as bad as mine was when I still believed in Santa clause

0

Anonymous OP 2w

They never compared climate change to Santa clause directly wowww😭

3