Anonymous #1 4w

It’s objectively true that the Bible has verses where God endorsed chattel slavery in reference to child slaves

-1

Anonymous OP 4w

No. That’s your opinion since you lack context and original translations.

13

Anonymous #1 4w

No. It’s actually not my opinion lol. Without looking it up, which verse mentions the selling of children?

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m sorry are you asking me or yourself that, since you’re the one saying what you are saying?

6

Anonymous #1 4w

It doesn’t surprise me you didn’t understand. Go ahead, answer! I’m waiting!

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

Your question is literally an ad hominem. You think because I can’t say the verse LETTER BY LETTER then that makes me unknowledgeable on the topic. Additionally I asked a clarifying question, to which you still haven’t answered.

11

Anonymous #1 4w

Not an answer! Try again! I asked first and you now know it’s for you! So hurry up! If you’re too uneducated on the bible that’s fine, I can do it without looking it up. You just have to answer by telling me the verse or saying you don’t know!

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

Who gave you the authority to determine what can be an answer or not? I already said I don’t know the verse letter by letter. Nevertheless that doesn’t change the fact that all of the “slavery” verses you pull up, including or excluding children, are taken out of context. Probably because they are VERSES (phrases) instead of the entire chapter.

2

Anonymous #1 4w

So no you don’t know! Got it! That’s all you had to say! Do you agree that chattel slavery is being owned as property in a dynamic you do not consent to?

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

Most “slavery” in the Bible that you are saying was indentured servitude, not chattel.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

I’m aware of those differences. There’s a point to what I’m asking, you didn’t answer!

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m not answering to your liking because I know you keep playing games. You don’t want to actually learn, thus your series of ‘loaded questions’.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

Asking you if you agree with the way I’m defining chattel slavery, is loaded?

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

No. Asking series of trick questions where either pre-meditated answer would obviously discredit a person, like forcing moves in Chess, are loaded questions. In addition, you are looking for the answers from me that you already memorized in the shower for this very argument, to which I won’t do. Either you want to learn or you don’t.

7

Anonymous #1 4w

It’s a trick question to ask you where in the bible I’m even referring to? Great excuse lol Define chattel slavery! Go ahead. I’m waiting

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

What is the relevance of asking the definition of chattel slavery?

12

Anonymous #1 4w

Oh man; I wonder what the relevance would be in asking.

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

I wonder too, since God never condoned chattel slavery, meaning it has no place in this argument.

10

Anonymous #1 4w

I’m arguing that he did! So yes it 100% has a place in this discussion. Go ahead. Define it. I’ll wait.

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

Not trying to be irrelevant here, but why do you keep repeating those last 3 sentences? It almost seems like a bot.

5

Anonymous #1 4w

Didn’t do it, try again. Seems peculiar you can’t define the thing you’re arguing against.

-2

Anonymous #2 4w

Gods constantly contradicting himself

-1

Anonymous OP 4w

God did not write the Bible

5

Anonymous #2 4w

So the inconsistencies are supposed to be ignored?

0

Anonymous OP 4w

I promise you that whatever contradiction you think you found has not been ignored by The Church. My point was that I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.

5

Anonymous #2 4w

1. It’s not some new revelation that the bible is inconsistent. So it’s weirdly disingenuous to imply I found them 2. My point is that there’s explicit verses where God endorsed chattel slavery which is factually correct

-1

Anonymous #3 3w

Sure, Exodus 21:4. Do you agree that chattel slavery is the owning of person as property without that persons consent?

1