Anonymous #5 6d

Difference is he didn’t have a similar impact at all.

58

Anonymous #3 6d

0/10 bait. Go do something better with your time

54

Anonymous #7 6d

That’s not for you to decide. Once again, his funeral was larger than MLKs.

-21

Anonymous #5 6d

martin changed literally the entire country whether they wanted it to happen or not, charlie held debates. his funeral being larger doesn’t mean anything except that his family used his passing for profit🤣

62

Anonymous #8 6d

I could easily argue he did the same, but once again if seems you don’t care. As usual, making jokes about the man’s death or the outpouring of support is disgusting and you should be ashamed. I remember a good few who did the same over MLK, must be nice to be apart of that club huh?

-14

Anonymous #5 6d

Ya so was Sadam Hussein’s. His was bigger than Kirk’s funeral as well as MLKs and yet no one on earth would say Sadam influenced peoples opinions on social issues more than MLK did. And also I didn’t decide it, historians and researchers did.

44

Anonymous #7 6d

Yo, that has no comparison to what we’re talking about. Both Kirk and MLK were influential leaders of their time, and had a MASSIVE impact. I literally said TO START that I don’t think he had a bigger impact than MLK, but using that as an excuse to belittle or nullify his impact is WRONG .

2

Anonymous #5 6d

liberation is not comparable to anything charlie did, point blank period. i feel no shame or guilt making fun of the people blindly supporting this man because i know the difference between me and an anti mlk person😜

9

Anonymous #5 6d

Comparing Kirk to MLK in any way is far more disrespectful and wrong than saying MLK had a much greater impact than Kirk. Especially since Kirk stood against everything MLK stood for (Kirk wanted to repeal the civil rights act). If you want to compare Kirk’s impact compare it to another conservative because all comparing him to MLK does is make it seem like Kirk has triumphed over MLK and that MLK’s ideas were wrong (because again Kirk stood against everything MLK stood for).

35

Anonymous #7 6d

And there we go, you admit you know nothing about the man by spitting out the same out of context garbage that you’re told. Comparing ANYONE to MLK is a compliment above anything else (as it should be), and you cosplaying some “virtuous hero” who’s defending his honor because others see him as the gold standard to compare to is just childish.

-6

Anonymous #7 6d

And you’re right! He did stand against communism and cheating on / beating your wife! Just because you’re a good speaker doesn’t make you a good person! (But Charlie was!)

-6

Anonymous #5 6d

a compliment to charlie and a spit to the face of mlk and what he’s done, try again

13

Anonymous #1 6d

Not even, MLK was assassinated by the fbi bc they knew that his stance on issues past race would actually bring down the system

88

Anonymous #6 6d

absolutely insane

54

Anonymous #5 6d

MLK was a socialist who believed in racial equity. Charlie Kirk was a billionaire funded conman spewing racial agitation propaganda to cause the working class to fight against one another. You’re just a gullible idiot who got conned. Comparing MLK to his oppressors is psychotic and pathetic.

30

Anonymous #9 6d

They both got shot in public is the similarity I’m referring to

45

Anonymous #5 6d

“Comparing MLK is compliment above anything else” but Charlie Kirk wouldn’t have even wanted to be compared to him and would’ve considered it an insult 😐

19

Anonymous #3 6d

I’d literally never heard of him before he got shot (not being facetious) but MLK has an entire day. MLK gave a speech at the Lincoln Memorial to an estimated 250k+ people in attendance plus the millions of people watching him live on their TVs. Kirk went to college campuses and had debates with random students and posts compilations of him Owning The Libs. Come on now.

18

Anonymous #12 6d

That’s honestly all I’m really pointing out here. People are just spiteful because it’s Charlie Kirk, and want to be hateful. I GET the idea of seeing it as demeaning to compare him to MLK if u don’t like him, but it’s not at all being used in that context so they’re just mad

-3

Anonymous #10 6d

Bro you are insanely delusionally bluepilled so far that nobody can save you. Please seek help or a trusted source of sanity at your nearest convenience

-4

Anonymous #5 6d

That doesn't mean anything whatsoever if anything it shows how bad our society is getting

6

Anonymous #9 6d

There’s a lot of stuff pointing to Charlie Kirk being assassinated. I don’t like the man at all, but to be shot from that distance? It takes a professional, plus there’s other stuff

18

Anonymous #13 6d

That’s true, also the gun they “found” would have made his head blow up like JFK, not a little neck wound

2

Anonymous #5 6d

lol what a pathetic response. you should learn to admit you’re wrong otherwise you just make a fool of yourself

9

Anonymous #5 6d

please explain how any of that was wrong at all. we both know you can’t. or, you would’ve. it’s harder to convince someone they’ve been conned then it is to con them

6

Anonymous #10 6d

The confidence with which you spew this stupidity is astonishing. Saying something so delusional there’s not even a basis of reality to argue on is not a “gotcha”. That’s like pulling out “it must be the Jews!” Any time somebody said something conspiratory. Please seek help

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Right, snd spewing conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk being some government plant billionaire class warfare pawn is is so much more coherent and competent

-2

Anonymous #5 6d

you guys are so obvious in how you argue. you can’t make a counter argument. cause you’re wrong. but, you’re too immature to admit that, so, instead, you use so much hyperbole and bullshit rhetoric to describe my argument as if that makes you look less dumb.

8

Anonymous #5 6d

“Roughly half of the group’s $40 million in income in 2020 came from 10 anonymous donors” “But in 2017, Kirk admitted that some of the group’s anonymous donors “are in the fossil fuel space”” “Bernie Marcus (The Marcus Foundation) – $2,500,000 in 2023 to TPUSA “Bradley family network (Bradley Impact Fund) – about $23.6 million total, 2014–2023, including “over $8.1 million in 2023.””

6

Anonymous #10 6d

Doug & Darwin Deason (Deason Foundation) – about $1.8 million, 2016–2023 in total; examples include $250,000 in 2022 and $250,000 in 2023 to TPUSA. the funniest one is the $10,000 seed round from foster friess that literally started tpusa

7

Anonymous #5 6d

got anymore snarky and delusional replies? you are embarrassing yourself with the way you’re replying like a child throwing a tantrum so please do continue

4

Anonymous #13 6d

Assassination means the motivation has to be political. Like a private attack to kill someone with political motivation (it also might count for someone high ranking in an organization like the pope or something, especially if the country is a theocracy)

6

Anonymous mother_russia 6d

Neither MLK nor Charlie Kirk brought us to Communism….yet

-9

Anonymous #6 6d

both were radicals and lowk insane

-15

Anonymous #7 5d

lol

1