
Marshal Plan, supporting Egypt in the Suez Crisis, attempting to curtail French and British colonial projects in Africa, embargoing Apartheid South Africa (though this took way longer than it should have), some of the so-called ‘color revolutions’ were good, supporting some of the Arab Spring revolutions. Rapidly reintegrating Asian states like, South Korea, Japan and former enemies like Vietnam while not enforcing Kuomintang rule in China to the level we could have.
We should have supported India in the 20th century, but now we are righting that historical wrong, even though it’s arguably not “better for the world” in a traditional sense. We also have a done a fuck ton of humanitarian projects, including being the number one provider of funds to nearly every function of the UN but people will still say that said projects were ‘bad’ The expansion of NATO into ex-Soviet republics prevented dozens of wars, remember that the only two former Soviet states…
Amazing lets go piece by piece: the US does not care about freeing countries from imperialism. The US simply wants to become to dominant imperial power in the world. The Arab Spring was completely fabricated by the US to help it take out the anti-Israel governments and to sponsor a bigger Israel. The Marshall Plan was only enacted because otherwise Europe would have become socialist. Name one good color revolution. Every single time a color revolution happened it replaced a democratically
elected government with a dictatorship. Look at Ukraine. They actively take down monuments to Soviet war hereos and replace them with literal Nazis. Why is Stephen Bandera the "hero" of Ukriane when he murdered tens of thousands of innocent civilians? Same in Georgia etc. There was no "ethnic cleansing" in Serbia. This is absolute BS. The US intervened to gain more NATO members and to prevent Russian influence from growing in the Balkans.
Again, Net good doesn’t take into account intentions. Very few states are altruistic because idealistic altruism was very unfortunately proven to be a weak form of foreign policy as 20th century India has shown. Most institutions will try to rectify their own morality and their interests into a single policy goal, which is exactly what caused many of these decisions to be undertaken in the way they were.