Anonymous #10 16w

He didn’t do jack shit to be respected. He was a stochastic terrorist.

25

Anonymous #2 16w

how so? elaborate

-5

Anonymous #10 16w

Repeatedly called trans people pedophiles while saying pedophiles deserve the death penalty (ironic considering current circumstances). Blamed gun violence on black and trans people TILL HIS DYING BREATH. He was also one of the leading voices against gun regulations, making him almost directly responsible for children being shot up in their classrooms. Sorry you can’t handle some dark humor, liberal but it’s not my problem.

32

Anonymous monkey_d_yikyak 16w

Lmao you can’t be serious, wouldn’t you rather honestly hate someone than dishonestly hate them? And if ur gonna hate someone at least be better than the character you prop them up to be

-7

Anonymous #9 16w

lol you can be better while acknowledging their wrong doings?? All the things ol kirky (rip🕊️) has said are online all you have to do is look

-1

Anonymous monkey_d_yikyak 16w

Just because you’re too weak to hear what needs to be said doesn’t mean his points weren’t valid. Maybe one day you’ll understand that criminals (ie school shooters) don’t follow gun laws, and having an area where no one can carry to defend themselves puts a huge target on everyone there. I know somewhere in that weird little MLP pea brain you’ve got, there are two cells you can rub together to comprehend the reasons his positions were such.

2

Anonymous #13 16w

My point was how is celebrating the death of someone you disagree with different than them saying trans should get the death penalty lmao how dense can you be, I’m against death PERIOD, and that’s easy for me to say. Btw PLEASE link me to where he said that I would LOVE to know, except he never said it so you can’t

-8

Anonymous #1 16w

“Doesnt mean his points weren’t valid” but he was just slandering black people, trans people, and other groups for no reason. I’m so tired boss 🫩

22

Anonymous #9 16w

Maybe you’re better than me oh holy one but I’m not against death. Does it suck? Sure. I wouldn’t wish death upon anyone seriously but I can sleep happy at night knowing people that hate me for doing nothing to them are dead and can’t hurt me and lie awake knowing those that do are still alive. I disagreed with Charlie Kirk but I didn’t hate him like he hated so many others.

6

Anonymous #13 16w

Maybe we should just put all this stuff behind us and go on a date

-2

Anonymous #11 16w

You keep saying “no reason” but it’s clear that you never watched him in full context where he gives all the reasons backed by data.

0

Anonymous #1 16w

There are three kinds of lies. Lies, damn lies, and statistics. -Mark Twain

1

Anonymous #17 16w

Nah, we aren’t like him and his ilk.

16

Anonymous #2 16w

Hopefully you’ll know how to answer for the things you say one day

-6

Anonymous #17 16w

I won’t have to. I don’t promote harming others.

17

Anonymous #17 16w

Hypocrisy

15

Anonymous #18 16w

He was always fucking awful.

18

Anonymous #18 16w

Bro, he literally was racist He said the voting rights act of 1964 was a “huge mistake”. If you agree with him on that, I can give you historical examples of why it was needed.

13

Anonymous #19 16w

First, you’re talking about the wrong law. The Voting Rights Act was 1965. The quote was about the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Second, criticizing a law doesn’t automatically make someone racist. The actual debate is whether his criticism was about racial equality itself or about federal government authority. You can disagree with his reasoning, but those aren’t the same thing.

-1

Anonymous #18 16w

You’re right I did give the two names of the laws confused in my head. But when someone says “made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.” That’s pretty fucking racist. You do realize without federal intervention Black people could not vote in the American south.

4

Anonymous #19 16w

Charlie Kirk also pushed the great replacement theory especially when he has a podcast episode called “ the great replacement theory is real, and here’s proof”

2

Anonymous #19 16w

I agree federal intervention was necessary. My point is that criticizing the Civil Rights Act doesn’t automatically make someone racist. People have opposed parts of it for constitutional or federal power reasons without opposing racial equality. If you think Charlie Kirk is racist, point to something he’s said that shows he supports racial discrimination or racial superiority, not just that he criticized a law.

-2

Anonymous #18 16w

I did I pointed out. He is a proponent for the great replacement theory. Which is both racist and antisemitic

7

Anonymous #19 16w

Ok can you tell me what he said about it? I’ve heard many people use “Great Replacement Theory” to mean different things, so I’d rather look his actual quote or quotes on it than just go off of headlines.

-2

Anonymous #18 16w

“They love it when America becomes less white... it is about bringing in voters that they like and, honestly, diminishing and decreasing white demographics in America.”

6

Anonymous #19 16w

I can see why people would view that quote as evidence of Great Replacement Theory. I’d want to see the full context before deciding whether he’s talking about a racial replacement conspiracy or making an argument about immigration and voting demographics. I think illegal immigration is bad, and the reason that it was such a shitshow during bidens term is because he basically purposely let them in so they could vote for him. I think this is what Charlie was saying, just based on this quote.

-1

Anonymous #19 16w

It’s also worth mentioning I don’t agree with everything he says. That’s not saying I’m saying he’s wrong here, I’m just saying that people expect me to die on the hill of everything he said which I don’t, I die on the hill that says he is not racist or homophobic. You have still yet to give me evidence that he said one race is superior, or that he said one race shouldn’t be here or something

-1

Anonymous #18 16w

He said Black women don’t have the mental capacity to be in high positions and had to rely on DEI to get in. Said the Civil Rights act was a mistake. Questioned the skills of Black pilots and professionals. He was a POS and so are you for defending that. 🙄

8

Anonymous #18 16w

Saying you will die on the hill literally means you are so stubborn NO evidence could possibly convince you to change your position. Which makes talking to you absolutely useless

6

Anonymous #10 15w

he high key got what was coming, got off easy tbh

7

Anonymous #20 15w

Death for disagreeing with your dumbass politics. Sounds fascist bro

1

Anonymous #4 15w

keep sucking the boot you dumb bitch

0

Anonymous #4 15w

You can’t say that, it makes too much sense bro. They will just shoot you and then gaslight everyone into thinking it was your fault for disagreeing.

0

Anonymous #21 14w

What's nicer than celebrating someone turning away from their intolerance?

0

Anonymous #5 14w

Opinions are fine until they don’t match yours huh.

5

Anonymous #21 14w

Dude, someone being intolerant of race, gender, and sexual orientation is not the same as someone being intolerant of such intolerant people... how fucking stupid are you?

5

Anonymous #5 14w

Lmao celebrating death of someone who disagreed with you is different then disagreeing with people who disagree w u

0

Anonymous #5 14w

Ur justifying celebrating his death?

0

Anonymous #9 14w

So it was wrong for America to celebrate the death of Bin Laden? It was wrong to celebrate the death of Hitler?

2

Anonymous #5 14w

Are you actually that delusional that you think we killed bin Laden because he “disagreed” with us, or that Kirk was on the same level as Hitler, that’s actually the funniest thing ever you gotta be rage baiting

1

Anonymous #5 14w

You might be helpless, deadass.

1

Anonymous #19 14w

Leftists are bragging about replacement now

1