
As a bio student, heavily disagree. Its arguably more ethical considering the animal got to live a full, natural life before being taken, opposed to farm (and especially factory farmed) animals that are kept in small enclosures. Humans are omnivores, and even plant farming has casualties. Not all hunting is trophy hunting! In fact, it makes up an extremely small percentage of hunts (and even then, trophy hunts usually give the meat to local communities/tribes).
Humans also take up so much space that even if we arent actively killing natural predators, they dont have the numbers needed to keep prey populations in check in some areas. Lack of population control means things like human/deer accidents/deaths and worsening disease in prey populations (and potential overgrazing, which can cause mass starvation). Look up CWD (chronic wasting disease), its horrific when diseases are allowed to spread across dense, large populations.
So you eat meat, and youre still… anti meat? I dont even like veganism but this is a very weird stance. Humans eat meat, and were either gonna get it from farmed animals or hunted animals. Theres no such thing as a free lunch, lol, it comes with being a heterotroph. If we could eat rocks, itd be great, but unfortunately we have to eat living organisms to survive. And even eating fruits and veggies means taking land away from animals. Its always gonna be a give and take
We have hunting laws for a reason. Poaching an animal is stupid, but hunting laws are in place for that reason. The laws are (when done responsibly) for specific reasons and within specified limits. You need permits and tags to hunt, and may only take so many animals. Im not sure what you think hunting is
no i still think it’s you! but wow it looks like you can be observational! i did make a point about hunting seasons existing to prevent over hunting/population control! maybe if you’d analyze a little further you could connect the dots that the statement i made about that is in fact a point!!
Hunting has been a tradition passed on by men for thousands and thousands of years to provide for their family. It takes knowledge, skill, and patience. And if you couldn’t or wouldn’t do it (you), you would starve. I’m absolutely not backing down off the stance that it is one of the most masculine activities.
I’d attack your argument if you ever provided one. You still have yet to provide a better solution. It seems like you’re implying we shouldn’t hunt bc we have technology but then you also don’t like farm bred animals. Should we not read because we have computers now…? Genuinely what is your position other than a limp attempt to bash something you don’t understand?
I’m not going to keep repeating myself. If you decide you can read at some point you can go back and look at what I’ve already said. As far as being a dying breed, that’s laughable. Gen Z is shaping up to be significantly more conservative than their parents. Every day more people are learning hunting and homesteading and rejecting the androgynous dystopian hellscape future people like you have to offer. And I’m helping that every chance I get by teaching everyone I can how to shoot and hunt.
It’s not weird. Men have been hunters and providers and women have been gatherers and homemakers for thousands of years. Each sex complimented the other and made for an efficient family unit. Hunting has always been a masculine activity and it will continue to be one. The patriarchy has been around for so long because it worked. And honestly, with how fast society has declined with its attempted uprooting we really need it back in full force with strong male family influence and leadership.
You’re literally describing yourself lmao. Holy shit you’re actually one of the dumbest right wingers I’ve ever seen and it isn’t close. How much would it cost to get your ass out on the campaign trail for republicans leading up to the midterms? Name your price because I’ll pay it.
Ok so let me get this straight - advocating for strong male roll models in home, school, and leadership, wanting single a income to be viable for supporting a family, pushing for men to be supporters and protectors, and generally disagreeing with 3rd wave feminism makes me the same as a slave owner and/or a degenerate rapist? I think you might need to visit grippy sock jail. The loss of masculinity and patriarchal values has absolutely crushed the west.
Oh no, I know exactly what I’m advocating for, you just don’t like that I’m advocating for it. Feminism has been a complete and utter failure, and western nations have seen a steep decline because of it. Just today they released footage of the last assassination attempt where the female officers ran and male officers drew their weapons and advanced towards the gun fire. Roles were designated because those who came before learned what each sex was good at and had them do that.
Being a home maker and raising children isn’t oppression, it’s essential for a healthy society. I implore you to research mouse utopia. Advocating for the destruction of the patriarchy and everything else that comes with dismantling what you believe is oppression is truly what’s dangerous.
As for my comments being upvoted, it’s because I’m explaining something others find to be true, despite you two not being able to accept that. Society is at a point where it can go two directions, liberalism will destroy birth rates and affordability so much that there will eventually be no one to maintain the infrastructure men built, or we will right ourselves and return to the societal and family roles that we are hardwired for and that have always worked in order to continue western society.
Myself and many others have just gotten to the point where instead of trying to prove that we aren’t any of the idiotic diluted names you call us, we just agree and move on doing what we need to in order to secure the future of those we care about (by providing food from hunting). In a generation or two my horrible, disgusting way of thinking will have taken back the reigns of the west, and yours will have perished. Deus vult, princess.