Anonymous #1 24w

partying*

34

Anonymous #2 24w

That joke would hit better if she was a “political commentator” (debated uninformed college kids)

74

Anonymous #4 24w

What joke? I thought we were just talking about dead people we disagreed with politically?

-20

Anonymous #2 24w

Good’s last words were “I’m not mad at you”. Kirk’s last words were blaming gun violence on black and trans people. I think there’s a slight difference in terms of quality of character between these two

103

Anonymous #5 24w

Goods last actions were running over a federal officer. Kirk’s last actions were talking to college students. I too think there’s a slight difference in terms of quality of character.

-23

Anonymous #2 24w

Which body cam footage are you watching? Best is Charlie was taken out for demanding the Epstein files should be released , hmmm who wouldn’t want that to happen? 🍊 💩

41

Anonymous #2 24w

Kirk last Actions were taking one for his “Winning” team of LOSERS!

53

Anonymous #2 24w

Someone drank the koolaid

41

Anonymous #6 24w

Good took a whole lot more than one for those illegals that are still getting deported. Oh well.

-17

Anonymous #5 24w

Orange koolaid, the base is either, slow adults, racists or pedos. Fun fact most are at least two of them- Truth Social pole

28

Anonymous #2 24w

Safe borders, unsafe playgrounds, got it- you should be on a list

27

Anonymous #2 24w

That 1.776 Billion payout fund is only going to wind up being about 10 bucks for everyone that puts in a claim.

23

Anonymous #2 24w

Dumb azz the wheel was turned, believe whatever da big man says tho 🤷🏻‍♂️

22

Anonymous #7 24w

The orange Turdists believe whatever their manure spreading leader spews

31

Anonymous #5 24w

That is not what he said. Learn your sh?t!

-6

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #8 24w

cry about it

56

Anonymous #9 24w

it’s dark comedy lighten up

33

Only the turdists lose their minds, well they never actually had one to lose. 🍊💩

11

Anonymous #8 24w

We know we know, you love to worship pedos- need your address to send the cops over ✍️

11

Anonymous #8 24w

take a joke homie

17

Anonymous #3 24w

I mean it’s kind of normal to not make repetitive jabs at the deceased lol. I haven’t even seen a new joke, it’s just saying the same thing over and over like an insane person.

1

Anonymous #10 24w

So pointing out you’re cool with worshipping a pedo is insane. That’s no joke and it’s interesting that that’s how you justify it, his proven base is slow adults, racists and pedos, no joke which are you, Hint? Most are at least two of those- again not a joke - put yourself on a list

12

Anonymous #10 24w

I would call Hitler a genocidal dictator and evil but I shouldn’t criticize dead people? Right? 😭😭😭😭😭😭

11

Anonymous #2 24w

Good’s last action wasn’t running over a federal officer. If she ran over said officer, WHAT GOOD WOULD IT DO TO SHOOT HER? You fučķ1ng dolt.

10

Anonymous #8 24w

Cope

23

Anonymous #2 24w

Bro rlly thought this rage bait would work 😂😂

12

Anonymous #9 24w

Charlie Kirk justified the murder of Charlie Kirk. Get bent.

45

Anonymous #14 24w

Bros dickriding a dead guy

24

Anonymous #2 24w

You definitely support pedophiles and killing children

11

Anonymous #2 24w

Isn’t that the cunt that got blown away tryna block the road and attack the Feds? Sounds abt right

-5

Anonymous #14 24w

She wasn’t trying to attack them. Her last words were literally “I’m not mad at you”. You’re disgusting if you support armed government thugs killing innocent citizens. It should’ve been you.

14

Anonymous #19 24w

You’re not helping your cause trying to get someone else to die. Regardless of her intent, she made a poor decision in moving her vehicle and ICE reacted on the assumption of violence, really neither one’s fault.

-3

Anonymous #10 24w

So you’re saying that since she didn’t move her vehicle they had the right to take her life?

11

Anonymous #3 24w

bro what are you even talking about. Did you copy this from an AI? Personally, I don’t mouth out dead people. If their lifestyle or actions is topic, it will be discussed, but never really have any reason to use my energy towards pissing myself off.

-3

Anonymous #3 24w

This discussion was about Kirk, right?

-2

Anonymous #16 24w

Never said criticize at all in the entire comment that I made lol

-3

Anonymous #19 24w

When you’re in a position where you pose the highest chance of threat to agents by moving your vehicle, and when such agents’ assumptions will be, typically, threat, they act. I think it was too in the moment to consider that, which is why I said it kind of isn’t on her, nor would it be on agents whose assumption is necessary

-3

Anonymous #10 24w

She didn’t pose a threat? She was calm and said she wasn’t mad? And that makes it okay for them to murder her in cold blood, then angrily call her a bitch? People who defend ice are disgusting.

14

Anonymous #19 24w

Doesn’t matter whether or not she *actually* posed a threat. What mattered was that an agent was in front of the vehicle, and moving that vehicle forward prompted action, because when you’re in that field, you don’t assume that someone’s *not* going to do the thing.

-4

Anonymous #10 24w

Coward Cops

15

Anonymous #10 24w

1. They told her to leave the area. That’s what she did. 2. Let’s think about this logically. If YOU are standing in front of a vehicle coming directly towards you, what EXACTLY do you think will happen if you shoot and kill the driver?

15

Anonymous #10 24w

It doesn’t matter if she posed a threat or not? What the hell are you on about? You were literally just saying they had the right to shoot her because she posed a threat to them. So you’re saying it doesn’t matter whether she posed a threat or not, it was justified of them to murder her either way? What is wrong with you? You’re saying an innocent woman’s murder is justified even if she didn’t pose a threat. You’re either a bootlicker or you’re just plain stupid. You need some serious help.

16

Anonymous #1 24w

Yeah if he was good at parrying, he’d still be here

23

Anonymous #23 24w

Crazy how the president will lower the flags to half mast for him, but won’t do a thing for literal soldiers who died under his watch.

18

Anonymous #19 24w

You need to work on reading comprehension. Even if she wasn’t “actually” a threat, she posed a threat. If you look at the video, her tire spin before moving was the extremely throttled. If it weren’t for the ice, she would’ve hit ICE. The agent did suffer injury, so there was damage, and I wouldn’t blame them for reacting to that.

1

Anonymous #10 24w

The agent SHOULDN’T HAVE BEEN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET TO BEGIN WITH. They told her to go home. That’s what she was trying to do. Again, I pose the question: if YOU are standing in front of a moving vehicle, what EXACTLY do you think is going to happen if you shoot the driver?

8

Anonymous #17 24w

So funny how you can say that the agent shouldn’t have been in the street conducting his work, but you can’t say Good shouldn’t have been there interfering, provoking, and trying to run ICE over. There’s nothing between your ears.

-5

Anonymous #20 24w

I take it you didn’t pay attention to the latest election in Kentucky, did you?

0

Anonymous #2 24w

He’s won the primary not the seat queen, the orange turd wave isn’t going anywhere but down. Safe borders / unsafe playgrounds and proms isn’t a great campaign strategy

5

Anonymous #2 24w

She wasn’t interfering. She was trying to go home. Do you REALLY think she was trying to run them over? She literally stopped to tell them “I’m not mad at you” before pulling away (as directed by ICE mind you) to GO HOME. I don’t know if you have driven a car before, but if she REALLY wanted to run ICE over, it would have been easy as they were all lined up in the middle of a street for some stupid reason.

8

Anonymous #8 24w

Remember, they’ll say cope about Charlie Kirk and that “he was just a podcaster,” like that changes the morality of murder, but when someone says something about Renee Good or George Floyd, suddenly the tables turn and you’re the bad one. I say joking about anyone’s death is bad, but that’s a very unpopular opinion among both political sides.

-8

Anonymous #20 24w

Don’t the police oftentimes have to shoot school shooters to save the lives of other school students? Does that gun not save lives?

-6

Anonymous #26 24w

Only one side endorses it legitimately. The president, the choice for the republicans and conservatives has mocked the deaths of people. He’s mocked brutal attacks. Republican congressmen, senators. governors always endorse violence. The moral equivalent the left has is random anon users on twitter and YY. The right is okay with murder as long as it’s against people they don’t like. They still to this day support trying ti get Chauvin out for the murder of Floyd

18

Anonymous #26 24w

So you’re ignoring the guy with the gun who killed dozens who brought the cops to the scene? Did that school shooters gun save lives?

18

Anonymous #12 24w

Okay then, so why is the left commonly celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk and making jokes about it? Why was the left-leaning media stations endorsing the rioting and destruction of cities during the George Floyd riots? Seems like one endorses more violence to me.

-4

Anonymous #12 24w

How will banning guns prevent that from happening? Drugs are illegal, how’s that been going? How did prohibition go? People will always find ways around things. Just saying “don’t do that” will not work, especially when the only goal is to hurt someone.

-6

Anonymous #26 24w

Let’s play this game. Find me a single leftist politician who has said they’re glad their political opponent is dead. Cause if you’re right it should be easy to show me that it’s everyone on the left including the people the left elects. Not just randoms on twitter. I’ll wait.

26

Anonymous #26 24w

Yes or no did the gun that shot up a school save lives?

8

Anonymous #12 24w

No, but if we ban guns what should the police do? Just try and talk to the guy and ask him not to shoot them too? What about if someone breaks into my house, which has happened to me, and wants to steal my valuables? Should I just kindly ask him not to take them and not shoot me and my family? Do you really think that’s going to work, it won’t. If we ban guns, they will still be manufactured or imported illegally. It happens with drugs today, and happened with prohibition years ago.

-7

Anonymous #26 24w

Did the gun that shot up any parade or crowded mall save lives?

10

Anonymous #12 24w

Okay so we sign a paper and guns in America are banned. Now those shootings are suddenly gone because the government said guns are banned, right?

-7

Anonymous #26 24w

Did the gun that shoot up any mall or crowded area, save lives? Simple question.

11

Anonymous #12 24w

I know ignoring questions is a good tactic of when I got proven wrong, No, it doesn’t, but doesn’t a gun stop them from shooting people up, too? Who walks in that mall with what? It isn’t social workers with clipboards, it’s cops with guns. Is banning them going to save lives? “It’s simple question.” Because you can’t seem to answer.

-6

Anonymous #26 24w

You’re ignoring questions lol. You’re ignoring the other thing too. I’m not arguing banning guns moron. Show me a screenshot when I said we should ban them. I’ll wait.

10

Anonymous #12 24w

No the shooters don’t save lives. But having a gun to deal with those wack jobs should be allowed before they kill more. If banning them isn’t your solution, then what is?

-7

Anonymous #26 24w

Hold on. You didn’t do it. Show me when I said I wanted to ban them. You’re crying that I’m not answering. Now look at you avoiding showing me ever arguing for it.

12

Anonymous #12 24w

Okay then, show me where I said that guns used by mall shooters n’at are saving lives. I answered no very early on, but your narrow mind forgot to read that part.

-6

Anonymous #26 24w

Not a screenshot. You were asking me over and over about gun bans, so you either just made something up to argue against. Or you saw me say it. Which is it? I also never claimed you said school shooters save lives moron. Try again. Show the screenshot.

9

Anonymous #26 24w

I think banning guns would save lives. Of course you say “What about drugs? Drugs are illegal!” Tell me something Copernicus, do you think more or less people would die if all of a sudden every drug was legalized?

18

Anonymous #12 24w

Okay then, I’m so wrong for just “assuming” that you went with the route of gun ban like any democrat that has never owned or knows anything about guns I have ever met. Does that just make you so proud now? Do you want a cookie? You still have no solution to the gun issue, so what is it, “simple question?”

-6

Anonymous #26 24w

It makes it more difficult which dissuades a good number of people, plus gun control laws are more about preventing deadly domestic disputes or suicide attempts than mass shootings

12

Anonymous #26 24w

See that wasn’t so hard. Maybe don’t cry about things nobody said and you won’t get treated like a Trump supporter (that’s not positive by the way I know you’re dumb enough to potentially think it’s good to support pedophile criminals) What gun issue?

8

Anonymous #16 24w

Will it, though? How’s that been going with drugs? Aren’t we the most drug-addicted country in the world? How about prohibition? How’d that one go?

8

Anonymous #12 24w

Oh, there’s no gun issue now? What about the mall shooters and the school shooters you were just talking about? You make no sense at all.

-5

Anonymous #26 24w

I’m asking you to be specific moron. Try again, this time answer.

13

Anonymous #12 24w

I’ll talk when you can learn to read. I said it already.

-5

Anonymous #26 24w

It will. Some individuals will undoubtedly violate a law. Should we not outlaw murder because some people will still murder? States with the weakest gun laws in 2016 had an aggregate level of gun violence more than 3 times higher than the states with the strongest gun laws per CAP States that require background checks for all handgun sales have significantly lower rates of intimate partner gun homicides of women and police officers and gun-related suicides

15

Anonymous #26 24w

You, the same guy who made up a gun ban argument is saying that others can’t read lol. Do you not like guns all of a sudden? What specific thing about guns are an issue? The rate of death, the production, 3-D printed guns? Gun deaths happen yeah. So what?

11

Anonymous #12 24w

Deaths are bad? We should do what we can to protect the citizens of our country? You know, the purpose of government?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

I do have a solution by the way. I’m just waiting until you can comprehend the things I’m saying

6

Anonymous #16 24w

Obviously deaths are bad. The right loves murdering though so tell them that

6

Anonymous #16 24w

Okay, but gangsters are not getting their guns legally. What do I do when one enters my home to steal my valuables, which is very possible as I have mentioned my house has been broken into before? Should I kindly ask him not to steal them and to not shoot my family? I’d rather have a gun to protect myself from that. You don’t really know until it actually happens to you.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

We could reduce gun deaths right now if the right could act like adults and stop committing and endorsing so much crime

10

Anonymous #26 24w

For example, a few years ago there was a shooting at my local amusement park. It was a kid around 17 I believe he was and the gun was stolen out of a vehicle somewhere in Ohio, I believe it was Columbus. When the police went into the park to find him, they had their guns drawn to shoot to protect themselves and others. How would outlawing guns have prevented that shooting from happening? What would the police have to protect themselves?

-3

Anonymous #26 24w

Having a gun in your home makes you twice as likely to die by homicide and 3 times as likely to die by suicide Unintentional shootings are 4 times more common than legitimate defensive uses Victims who defend themselves with a gun are more likely to lose property (13%) than those who defend themselves through other non-lethal means (10%)

6

Anonymous #26 24w

Law enforcement officials can have guns lol, that’s the point, they’re there to deal with dangerous individuals You can’t prevent all shootings, but you can drastically reduce the amount that happen in total

10

Anonymous #16 24w

The right will cry about guns being banned as if they don’t do everything in their power to make sure people die from guns

10

Anonymous #16 24w

Murder is a poor analogy. That is an action, not a neutral object. Murder can be done in a variety of ways, but there is a subset involving firearms. Also, this seems very disingenuous when you consider that brandishing a weapon is considered gun violence which would be no surprise, among many other non-lethal, sometimes even undirected at people that are still considered “gun violence”. Do you have sources for those specific sections?

1

Anonymous #16 24w

I didn’t have one at the time of the break in, and thank God we were not home. My dogs were the only one here and I praise God they are still with us. Suicide is a mental health issue, not a gun issue. Having a gun does not affect whether or not you’re suicidal. No gun owners that I know, I know many, have ever done any “unintentional shooting.” They hunt or to protect family. If I lose property to save my family, then I don’t care. Their lives matter more than anything else I have.

-3

Anonymous #26 24w

Oh my god. Can you stop crying about the things that happened, nobody cares. Your entire political stance is based off of your feelings and not the actual world around you.

9

Anonymous #16 24w

Okay only law enforcement can have guns. So someone breaks in, now how should I protect myself during the 5-10 minute police response time, that being that I was able to dial 911?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

Suicide is a mental health issue. Firearms, though, are by far the most lethal, but common method of suicide, far more deadly than a bladed weapon or pills. Limiting access to firearms for suicidal people will save so many lives. Like I said, states with weaker gun laws have higher suicide rates. Your personal experience doesn’t trump statistics. Statistics 101. Defending yourself with a firearm is more dangerous for your family bc it can escalate the situation from a burglary to a shootout

8

Anonymous #26 24w

Never said only law enforcement can have guns lmfao, plus there are other ways to defend yourself than a firearm: martial arts, blunt object, blade, etc. Gun control isn’t about nobody having access to guns, it’s about limiting the access of guns to those who are a danger to themselves or others After that, it’s a personal choice, one I oppose because it puts you in a lot more danger, but if you’re not actively a danger to yourself or others you can own a firearm (unless you’re under 21 imo)

9

Anonymous #16 24w

Okay, statistics still does not answer my question of what I should do when someone breaks into my home with a gun and my gun was taken away because we outlawed firearms. Should I let them kill me and my family to “save lives” until the police (that were hopefully called) get there? You never really know how it is until you’re actually in that situation.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

I noticed you started ignoring me when I said I had a solution and was pressing you to be specific lol. What was that thing you said? Ignoring me proves me right since you can’t answer?

8

Anonymous #12 24w

Your solution was only law enforcement has guns?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

I’m not 16 moron. Read.

9

Anonymous #12 24w

I hit reply. I’m sorry it hit the wrong one. Does that boost your fragile ego? Do you want a cookie?

-3

Anonymous #26 24w

Never said we should outlaw firearms, can you read? Like, how many books have you read this year? Have you even read one?

8

Anonymous #26 24w

No one ever said only law enforcement should have guns dumbass

7

Anonymous #26 24w

You hit reply and you can’t distinguish the numbers 16 and 12? Anyways. I have a solution. What’s yours first?

8

Anonymous #16 24w

Someone said to outlaw. I’ve read multiple, thank you for asking, but the amount of books I’ve read does not affect this conversation.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

What is your solution?

6

Anonymous #12 24w

Few changes to current-Allow people to legally own firearms to protect themselves and their families. If we encourage that and encourage people to go to malls with one on them and have law enforcement in buildings with large amounts of people, such as malls or schools. Seeing a physical gun capable of taking care of the problem immediately should deters them from wanting to do anything way more than just saying “it’s outlawed” because they know they will immediately be shot right then and there.

-2

Anonymous #10 24w

https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/10/AmericaUnderFireSummary-report.pdf https://everytownresearch.org/report/update-background-check-laws/

7

Anonymous #26 24w

So your solution is more guns. Got it. I’m sure that’s smart considering how many right wingers have short tempers and strong urges to murder anyone that offends them.

7

Anonymous #26 24w

Yeah, neither of us said that. It’s the strawman argument you entered the conversation with.

6

Anonymous #26 24w

I would also have a federal requirement of a training in some sort of gun safety and things like that, just so it is prevented. I’d also enforce schools, malls, etc. to hire armed police officers (amount depending on building/crowd size) that are trained in dealing with an issue in those specific buildings. This worked well at my high school

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

So your solution is give more people guns, when the right is constantly screaming about wanting to be violent. Got it

6

Anonymous #12 24w

I know many gun owners that have never murdered anyone over something that offended them. The small, red town my college is in has never had that happen. But the blue city I live outside of, it sure happens a lot with stolen/illegally made guns.

-2

Anonymous #12 24w

You mean like all the wild leftists shooting anyone they disagree with politically? The trans weirdo opening fire at the White House the other day is really continuing that narrative for you.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

This would make public places less safe, states with concealed carry laws experienced a 15% increase in violent crime after their implementation And even if guns don’t cause more crime, their presence makes already-existing robberies and assault significantly more deadly. Defensive gun use is rare, occurring in less than 1% of crimes. Plus, armed civilians can complicate law enforcement responses. Look into the story of Gabby Giffords, rest her poor soul

6

Anonymous #2 24w

No I mean all the right wingers who try to be violent. Just because facts offend you, doesn’t make them go away.

5

Anonymous #16 24w

Okay so a shooting happens. No guns allowed in the building, other than the shooter that got his/hers illegally. Wait until more people die in the 5-10 minutes police response time, which still doesn’t immediately save lives? Or should have a few people there with a gun on them, including a cop, to hopefully deter that from happening at all, or to take care of the situation before the police get there to save more lives?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

People ALREADY are allowed to carry. Alex Pretti was legally carrying a gun, and he was murdered because of it, even though the gun was removed from him BEFORE he was shot.

13

Anonymous #2 24w

Right-wing extremists are responsible for 75-80% of domestic terrorism fatalities since 2001 but it’s the leftists that shoot anyone they disagree with politically

5

Anonymous #26 24w

Oh so since you know some people that must mean all people are like that, right?

7

Anonymous #2 24w

I don’t know. The city I live outside of, which is heavily blue, has have shootings almost daily over gang related issues with illegal guns. The red town I go to school in never has these issues. At least for my region, redder the town, the less the issues.

1

Anonymous #26 24w

This is such an idiotic take. “I haven’t seen it personally so that’s how I’m going to approach national issues!” My conservative small town saw a ton of murders. I guess that means 90% of all small town conservatives are murders

7

Anonymous #12 24w

Then why is it republican politicians being targeted for these shootings? If right-wing people were so bad, why wasn’t there any assassination attempts on Biden’s or Obama’s life?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

A law enforcement official being present inside public places makes sense, other people shouldn’t have guns though, it hurts almost as often as it helps

3

Anonymous #26 24w

Assuming we’re talking about a place where firearms are strictly prohibited

8

Anonymous #2 24w

He wasn’t transgender you bigoted piece of shit.

9

Anonymous #12 24w

https://youtu.be/Hbe2V5LryTE?si=zbrbfh3OSCvzhkHx Here’s a compilation of leftists celebrating the assassination of their political opponents. Mueller died of natural causes, not being shot because someone disagreed with his opinions.

-5

Anonymous #12 24w

Not all, but I’ve never met one that was insane. You don’t know the life until you live it. I used to be more pro-gun control until my house got broken into. Then it hit home. I ALMOST was there that night, if it wasn’t for a funeral I had to be at.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

You forget about this?

9

Anonymous #26 24w

Or this

7

Anonymous #16 24w

So wait until a handful get killed until that cop, who is the only one allowed a gun, runs from one side of the mall to the other, that being that he heard the shot.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

Red states actually have significantly higher overall gun deaths rates than blue states. The states with the highest per-capita gin deaths rates are predominantly red, while the states with the lowest rates are almost exclusively blue.

9

Anonymous #26 24w

Just republicans huh?

8

Anonymous #26 24w

Well, I would say there should be more law enforcement officials than just one covering a large mall 😂

6

Anonymous #26 24w

A democrat being targeted for an execution? That’s weird! That’s not what you said was happening!

11

Anonymous #16 24w

Okay, but where in those states are those shootings? The cities, right? I don’t remember there being any gangs in small town America shooting at each other. It’s the cities. Cities always lean blue

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

Also there were attempts on both Obama’s and Biden’s lives, they were just foiled sooner

8

Anonymous #12 24w

Can you screenshot where I said “Just republicans”

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

Cities located within red states fave higher gun homicide rates than cities located within blue states because of weaker state-level gun laws and interstate gun trafficking

10

Anonymous #16 24w

Why aren’t they as common as Republican ones then?

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

There were plenty of attempts at both Obama and Biden, but the plans were thwarted well in advance because they didn’t have idiots running security or people thinking they didn’t need a ballroom that cost the same amount as Allegiant Stadium to keep safe.

14

Anonymous #17 24w

Three assassination attempts on trump, all leftists. Recent White House shooter, trans. Kirk’s assassin, leftist gayboi. Seethe, mald, and then accept you are the party of political violence.

-3

Anonymous #26 24w

Oh I see. So you can dismiss violence when it’s on the right but you only want to focus on the less violence the left does. What does the bottom left of the screenshot say? What is the group in blue? Is it left or right wing?

11

Anonymous #2 24w

Try again. Registered republican. Someone who took the time to register as a republican. You guys can’t fathom that some republicans dislike Trump

6

Anonymous #16 24w

Right, Compton, Chicago, and Detroit knowing that that piece of paper says gun control is better there.

-4

Anonymous #12 24w

Okay both of them are bad and have bad people, didn’t say that. But I’m saying that saying no guns isn’t helping anything. You can tell the toddler not to touch the stove, doesn’t mean they aren’t going do it.

-3

Anonymous #26 24w

Trump is more polarizing, he was the only one of the 3 to call for hanging political opponents, the only one of the 3 to call an election “rigged” when it wasn’t, the only one of the 3 to encourage an armed insurrection at the Capitol, etc. etc. Like Bush didn’t have this many attempts on his life, neither did Reagan. This isn’t a left-wing violence thing, this is a Trump thing

8

Anonymous #26 24w

Not an answer to the question I asked. Hurry up.

5

Anonymous #2 24w

Except the statistics say otherwise, 75-80% of domestic terrorism fatalities in this country since 2001 have been related to right-wing extremism

8

Anonymous #16 24w

I don’t care for Trump much, only reason I vote him is because I agree with more of his policies than Democrat polices.

-2

Anonymous #26 24w

In the graph I showed. Is it left or right wing extremism that accounts for more violence?

6

Anonymous #2 24w

THE RECENT WHITE HOUSE SHOOTER WASN’T TRANSGENDER YOU INANE BIGOT.

9

Anonymous #26 24w

Gun control exists in airports. Are you afraid to fly?

9

Anonymous #26 24w

Not relevant to this conversation tho, my point is that right-wing extremists are statistically much deadlier than left-wing extremists

7

Anonymous #2 24w

Also, there are PLENTY of instances where people on the right exhibited political violence. Plot to kidnap Michigan governor, kill Louisville’s mayor, burn down the Pennsylvania governor house, Pelosi’s husband attacked, thwarted attacks against Obama and Biden…

10

Anonymous #26 24w

“I don't care for Trump much, only reason I vote him is because I agree with more of his policies than Democrat polices.” Which policies? Are you talking about no new wars? Stopping inflation and lowering prices on day one? How about tariffs which raised prices for products for Americans?

9

Anonymous #2 24w

And even if the person was transgender, THAT’S NOT A BAD THING! An overwhelmingly amount of mass shootings are white males, but no one says a thing about that. But the second it MIGHT be a transgender person, you waste no time saying it is, even if it’s not, as if being transgender is why there was a mass shooting. I suppose you’ll continue questioning why next month is Pride month as well. 🙄🤦‍♂️

8

Anonymous #17 24w

On a per capita basis trans shooters are way ahead of white males.

13

Anonymous #20 24w

It is. Just like it’s legal to burn an American flag.

8

Anonymous #17 24w

F off commie

8

Anonymous #9 24w

He was a turd in the Trump punch bowl, they had him offed

11

Anonymous #3 24w

Bro sounds like an Israel sympathizer

1

Anonymous #2 24w

You can hate both Charlie Kirk and Israel 😭😭😭😭

3

Anonymous #26 24w

Fun drinking game: take a shot every time someone mistakes democrats and liberals for “left wing”.

11

Anonymous #2 24w

Cause of death doesnt matter, the sentiment is exactly the same

9

Anonymous #2 24w

How bout a compilation of all the dumb classless things the orange turd has said? Lies alone will be a Netflix 6 part series. Justify protecting a pedo, his base is slow adults, racists and pedos, which 2 are you?

16

Anonymous #26 24w

In Uvalde heavily armed officers waited 77 minutes in the school hallway before finally breaching the classroom to confront and neutralize the gunman.

5

Anonymous #26 24w

Gun violence 4,400 American kids every year.

6

Anonymous #26 24w

Every year 17,000 kids are shot.

5

Anonymous #26 24w

One out of three dead 15-17 year olds in America died by bullet wound.

6

Anonymous #9 24w

Trans/nonbinary people account for less than 1% of mass shooting attackers. Roughly 1% of the U.S. population identifies as transgender, so it’s proportionate.

4

Anonymous #17 24w

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

4

Anonymous #9 24w

This is actually false and reversed, the vast majority of shootings are perpetrated by white cisgender men, while transgender shooters account for less than 1% if such incidents

5

Anonymous #28 24w

Why should someone forfeit the right to own a gun if they have a medical marijuana card?

8

Anonymous #2 24w

Can you read? I said politicians. Try again.

7

Anonymous #16 24w

Not saying I agree with it, saying it as an example

-2

Anonymous #28 24w

Yeah, that’s what most gun control advocates advocate for too

5

Anonymous #10 24w

So that gives armed goons the right to murder an innocent woman?

7

Anonymous #2 24w

So you’re justifying murder?

4

Anonymous #2 24w

She was a legal observer, she was doing her job, she was supposed to watch what they were doing, ask them to obey constitutional statutes and laws, etc., she also clearly did not even come close to hitting the ICE agent at all

8

Anonymous #19 24w

This entire post is just liberals justifying the assassination of Kirk.

-3

Anonymous #16 24w

Legally observing isn’t the same as obstructing and assaulting. If you opened your fucking eyes and watched the different angles you’d see she clearly hit the agent… and the fact that the agent had injuries from being hit from the car.

-2

Anonymous #2 24w

You don’t mind when the right justifies the murder of Floyd though, right? Where’s all your comments crying about that? It’s almost like you don’t actually care about murder. You just care that people are acting like how you morons act about everything else.

6

Anonymous #2 24w

I’ve watched the angles, he was never seemingly hit, DHS lies regularly on social media so I wouldn’t trust what they say immediately

8

Anonymous #12 24w

Find one single comment I’ve made about Floyd. Go on.

-3

Anonymous #2 24w

That’s the point moron. Murder only offends you when it’s against a right winger. Otherwise you don’t bring up when the right constantly defends and mocks the murder of people. Why is that?

5

Anonymous #2 24w

I just don’t get how people are justifying the murder of an innocent mother. It doesn’t make any sense. Didn’t know the boot tasted that good.

11

Anonymous #2 24w

So you care about Charlie Kirk’s murder but you think Renee Good’s murder was justified? Are you fucking dumb or just amoral? Both were murdered by the government.

1

Anonymous #19 24w

I’m not celebrating her death. That’s the thing you can’t wrap your head around. I don’t think Good should’ve been shot, she should’ve stayed tf home instead of aggressing on agents. Instead, she decided to try and run over an agent and her own actions caused a repercussion. Kirk was talking to college students. Tell me how tf how that deserves a bullet?

3

Anonymous #2 24w

RENEE GOOD WAS GOING HOME AFTER DROPPING OFF HER KIDS! Holy crap. AGAIN, if she REALLY wanted to run over an agent, she would have.

4

Anonymous #2 24w

Neither of them deserved to die. Good didn’t aggress on ice. Her last words were literally “I’m not mad at you”. And what do you mean she should’ve stayed home? Are people not free to leave their homes now? Good did nothing wrong, she was murdered in cold blood by an “agent” who separates families and sends children to concentration camps. I truly don’t understand how anyone can defend ICE.

7

Anonymous #26 24w

What Trump policies do you agree with more than democrat policies?

5

Anonymous #26 24w

Then how do you explain this?

6

Anonymous #26 24w

Or this?

5

Anonymous #26 24w

Defensive gun use is incredibly rare, occurring in fewer than 1% of all reported personal and property crimes.

4

Anonymous #26 24w

On November 11, 2011, a man named Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez fired multiple shots from an assault rifle at the White House from Constitution Avenue. Several bullets struck the residential living area, though the family was not home. He was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison. Three men were arrested during the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver after plotting to assassinate then-candidate Obama using high-powered rifles.

3

Anonymous #26 24w

Two white supremacists were arrested in October 2008 for planning a national murder spree that was to end with an attempt to kill Obama. A Mississippi man, James Everett Dutschke, sent letters laced with the poison ricin to President Obama and other officials.

2

Anonymous #26 24w

An Alabama man named Adam Benjamin Hall was charged with interstate stalking after driving to the CNN presidential debate site in Atlanta on June 27, 2024, with the intent to kill then-President Biden. He was unable to find the correct building and was arrested. In August 2023, FBI agents attempting to serve a warrant on a Utah man named Craig Deleeuw Robertson—who had made repeated armed threats against Biden ahead of a presidential visit—shot and killed him after he brandished a firearm.

6

Anonymous #26 24w

Federal authorities uncovered a plot in October 2020 by an armed 19-year-old who traveled to within four miles of Biden’s Delaware home with guns, cash, and bomb-making materials.

5

Anonymous #26 24w

If more guns made us more safe wouldn’t we be safe by now?

5

Anonymous #20 24w

It doesn’t have to be all or nothing. Gun Registry Gun License Stamped bullets Universal Background checks Red flag laws Banning bump stocks

4

Anonymous #20 24w

Banning assault weapons Waiting periods Secure storage laws No more than 10 rounds

6

Anonymous #26 24w

Suicide is a mental health issue and a gun issue. Women attempt suicide 4x more than men. Men die by suicide 4x more than women. Men are 8x more likely to attempt suicide with a firearm than women.

6

He is.

0

Anonymous #20 24w

Nah we all know he faked it

3

Anonymous #8 24w

It’s just dark humor.

5

Anonymous #23 24w

Ngl I’ve had more dreams about him than most people I knows

-2

Anonymous #23 24w

Crazy how yall continue to defend a racist, sexist, homophobic loser that had no competency in public speech or debate

5

Anonymous #26 24w

Do you want to decriminalize all drugs? (I do, I’m just curious if your comparison holds.)

4

Anonymous #2 24w

No I didn’t.

0

Anonymous #20 24w

Most of these policies are also popular. The NRA just has congress hostage.

6

Anonymous #20 24w

Hostage makes them sound unwilling, more like on their payroll.

3

Anonymous #26 23w

Nothing to say?

0