Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

Show me some actual proof then.

11

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

just because you pretend there’s a guy in the sky doesn’t make it real, let people live leave us alone

4

Anonymous #2 2d

And just because you don't belive in him, doesn't make him false. God being real can't be definetively disproven nor can it be truly proven. So respectfully, What is your source. That is to the both of yall, depending on who's less lazy

14

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

Thats not the proof I asked for.

0

Anonymous OP 2d

And that's not the proof I asked for. I never claimed that God is 100% real, but that doesn't mean I can't wholeheartey belive in him. Anyone on this planet can believe in whatever tf they want. How do you think cults exist.

12

Anonymous OP 2d

It's only a problem when people are trying to force their beliefs on others. And I'm not doing that. Because a real Christian would jsut tell you about god, not passively threatened or URGEE you into beliveing in god

16

Anonymous OP 2d

Like there's a reason why the U.S allows peopek to pray to whoever they want, since yk, Scientology exists. But what you can't do, or at least shouldn't if you wanted to stay morally just, is go out of your way to disprove someone's belief without...

7

Anonymous OP 2d

having definitive proof about why their belief is false. And even then, that person can choose to not listen to you, because people also have Free Will, and it would pretty evil for you to force that person to bend to your own beliefs.

10

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

But ttyl, God hasn't been 100% proven fake nor 100% proven real. So you shouldn't hate on people that do choose to belief in God. But nothing wrong with disliking someone that goes out of their way to force their beliefs on you

5

Anonymous OP 2d

And where’s your proof? Like damn, some of us wanna believe that the intricacies of this world might be attributed to a beautiful creator. Sorry youre too miserable to just want everything in your boring life explained for, and two, to try and spread your misery as if we asked.

17

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

There’s no proof he exists; that’s the basis of my claim. What’s your proof he does?

-1

Anonymous #3 2d

What’s your proof he exists?

-1

Anonymous #2 2d

The fact that you can't disprove it, and lastly, SINCE YOU DIDN'T READ I never stated that God has been proven to be 100% real, it's just a fact that science cannot completely disprove it. And that's just the scientifical state of the world.

6

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

So you believe in something because you can’t prove it exists? lmao. Great logic.

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Aight, prove God doesn't exist for me, instead of baseless claims.

6

Anonymous 5n34ky801 2d

You already admitted you believe in something because there’s NO proof lol. You don’t even know for sure if your god is real, and now you want me to re-explain my argument?

-1

Anonymous #2 2d

Because you have no conclusive evidence to completely refute the other’s claims? Yes. Spew your bullshit again so we can make fun of you pls.

9

Anonymous #3 2d

So you also believe in something because you can’t prove it exists?

0

Anonymous #3 1d

Whew, I'm glad someone said it. I don't want to yap even more on a repetive pt hoping #2 would understand what I was saying

6

Anonymous 5n34ky801 1d

You asked me a question and you didn’t want to talk to me? Not surprised the christian can’t think critically

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

Well, I sure you never read my rant, but close to the end, I said that it was towards the OP and "#2". But I'm sure you were to stubborn to read get that far

1

Anonymous 5n34ky801 1d

So you can read but can’t answer, sure.

0

Anonymous #2 1d

you can’t prove that there aren’t supernatural forces so I’m not sure why you’re acting like you’re any more correct than them. you’re just proving you’re equally uncertain lol

6

Anonymous #6 1d

No, because I’m not the one claiming it to be factually correct lol. I’m saying there’s no proof for those claims, and therefore it’s not unreasonable to assert that they don’t exist. As new evidence arises my stance will shift. Theirs is, there’s no proof it’s real, but I’ll continue to believe it is

0

Anonymous #2 1d

absence of proof is not proof of absence. it is, in fact, unreasonable.

13

Anonymous #6 1d

Well said #6, well said

5

Anonymous #6 1d

1 is a lot less reasonable than the other. Even with the concession that I can’t 100% disprove it, they’ve given no legitimate evidence as to why their beliefs are in any way substantiated

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

having no proof is the basis of all religions, including atheism lol. and atheism is just another form of faith. you’re blatantly misunderstanding the concept of belief. the only “correct” one is agnosticism, which is literally saying that you’re not sure what’s out there. no one knows for sure 😭 and any particular religion (including atheism) just embraces one potential reality and works with it. there’s nothing particularly “reasonable” about atheism lol

8

Anonymous #6 1d

I’m an agnostic atheist lol. Which is a form of atheism. Is it reasonable to assume something exists, with no proof it does, yes or no?

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

it is not reasonable to assume something does or doesn’t exist without proof, as I’ve said.

5

Anonymous #6 1d

Simple yes or no will do just for the sake of this little thing.

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

it’s disgusting that you want such a black and white answer to a nuanced topic. it reveals you don’t care about truth. you only care about being right.

8

Anonymous #2 1d

faith isn’t about reason btw. it’s believing something you aren’t sure about. I’m sorry that you fundamentally misunderstand your own faith, but you are. you’re just as bad as the Christians you criticize with such certainty. you’re proudly ignorant of your own faith, and I beg you to actually learn about it instead of proselytizing.

7

Anonymous #6 1d

You can qualify it as much as you’d like but it’s not that hard of a question. Is it yes or no?

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

and what is my faith again?

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

no, it is not unreasonable to assume something exists without proof. that’s what a hypothesis is; a working assumption. all religions are hypotheses in the absence of proof, including atheism. and I feel genuinely sorry for you. you’ve gone full circle and became proudly ignorant while wishing to fight the proudly ignorant. shame on you. I don’t have time for bigots, and I don’t have time for you, either.

5

Anonymous #6 1d

So just to be clear, you’re asserting it is reasonable to assume something exists without proof? That’s what you’re trying to argue in the face of my question

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

educate yourself on your religion. you’re embarrassing yourself.

7

Anonymous 5n34ky801 1d

Shocker! #6 gave up after saying it’s not reasonable to assume something exists without proof, and then immediately changing his mind and saying it’s actually not UNREASONABLE to assume something exists without proof. That’s doesn’t make too much sense huh!

0

yes! they’re the atheist equivalent of a “Christian” who has never read the Bible nor goes to church yet uses their religion to discriminate against queer people.

10

That would make sense if they didn’t contradict themselves ! Is it reasonable or not I wonder

0

Anonymous #2 1d

Def - someone who does not believe in any gods (atheist) but also believes that the existence of a god is unknown or inherently unknowable (agnostic). They do not possess a belief in gods, but they also "do not claim to know for certain that no gods exist"

6

Anonymous #2 1d

Yet you also agree with the OP that no gods exist. So respectfully shut TF up unless your ready to apologize for your blatant hypocrisy and stubbornness to not value others freedom of choice to belive in a God.

7

Anonymous 5n34ky801 1d

you’re*** I don’t have to value anything I don’t want to. That’s my freedom of choice to believe what I want. Which is it; does 6 know? Is it reasonable or not because he said both! You’re not dumb enough to believe that both can’t be true….right?

0

OP pathetic too. Instead of addressing the bigotry perpetuated by many practitioners, they’d rather be a bigot themself. Genuinely disgusting.

6

Anonymous #8 1d

Awe, a cultist got upset. Good.

1

I’m responding to something I disagree with. You weren’t even being spoken to and you had to put your two cents in. I guess it’s only desperation when it’s someone else responding last

0

Anonymous #8 1d

I know, it’s so funny lmao

3

7 got his comments removed LMAOOO

1

Anonymous #2 1d

I’m giggling over here. Like I said, it’s pissing off all the right people. 😂

6

Anonymous #8 1d

“don’t say things that contradict my feelings!!!!”

4

Anonymous #2 1d

“But my imaginary friend doesn’t like that! :(“

6

Anonymous #8 1d

LMAO that’s literally what it is

2

Anonymous #2 1d

Enjoy your 48 hours #7🥰🥰

6

Anonymous #2 1d

I’ll be sure to tell that to the giant, invisible, pool-table eating dragon in my bathroom. You can’t talk to him, though, he’s shy. And invisible. But he’s very real and loves me specifically!

5

Anonymous #8 1d

Make sure you say 10 pool marys before bed or he won’t let gay people get married

3

Anonymous #2 1d

He doesn’t like flip flops with socks and will punish everyone wearing them with eternal gnashing. But he’s cool with arson even if it’s dangerous. He loves the smell of burnt offerings.

4

Anonymous #8 1d

I think you are not a nice person

0

Anonymous #9 1d

Far better than some imaginary friend some people have.

3

Anonymous #8 1d

You think so? I’m not sure I agree. I don’t pretend to know why this topic elicits such a strong reaction from you, but for many others it’s a source of comfort. You seem to take pleasure in removing that source of comfort, which I find disturbing.

0

Anonymous #9 1d

Because it’s manipulation and lies. What’s better? For something to be comforting, or something to be true? Because religion isn’t true, and it fails to provide comfort when you look past the surface.

2

Anonymous #9 1d

Some people find a source of comfort in segregation. Finding comfort in something doesn’t mean it can’t be criticized

4

Anonymous #2 1d

That’s very true, but I don’t think I really claimed otherwise. My original comment was that I don’t think #8 is a nice person. I didn’t say that because they were criticizing religion. I said it because they’ve been writing nasty things about, from what I can tell, anyone who believes in a god. I think a nice person would have found a more productive way to criticize something they feel strongly about rather than acting sort of childishly in an anonymous forum. Do you feel otherwise?

0

Anonymous #8 1d

I’m getting the impression that you think I’m making some sort of argument for religion. I’m not, I just said I don’t think you’re a nice person. When you read the things you’re writing about people you have never met, when you’re saying how happy it makes you that you’ve made them angry, do you really disagree with that? I’m not sure how else to read what you’ve written.

0

Anonymous #9 1d

You’re just pissed because I hate religious indoctrination and abuse. If the shoe fits, by all means, lace it up and run.

4

Anonymous #9 23h

Yeah kinda, would you find a productive way to talk about something you so desperately loathe? I don’t take nazism seriously for example. If a nazi speaks to me I don’t care about honest dialogue. I care about saying what I want because they’ve already decided to have those believes

0

Anonymous #2 23h

beliefs*

0

Anonymous #2 22h

You absolutely should take it seriously because nazi rhetoric gets people killed and you not shutting it down and preferring “honest dialogue” doesn’t accomplish shit.

1

Anonymous #9 21h

You’re too rational for this conversation to be productive I’m afraid 💔.. #8 lowkey just rage baiting religious folk, and not trying to actually dive into a meaningful criticism or discussion of religious practices. Either that or the literacy rates are just low around here

-1

Anonymous #10 21h

Low literacy is exactly how Christianity spread. The road to atheism is paved with bibles read front-to-back. You should give it a go and think critically for a change. Truth will always be more important than a false sense of comfort.

1