Anonymous #1 13w

i think there would be a lot more that got done, might ‘take longer’ but things would get done instead of having to settle and weigh the pros and cons of the many different items within it and in turn stretching out the process

44

Anonymous OP 13w

That’s a good point, I agree

6

Anonymous #2 13w

a lot less arguments, and i’d even argue, less polarization of politics, at least at the congress level

10

Anonymous #3 13w

smooches babez

6

Anonymous #4 13w

without problems, they have no job. without division, they have no popularity, status, and fall right in light with everyone else

6

Anonymous #1 13w

There also wouldn’t be as many government shutdowns with some politicians holding something like Veterans Affairs pay hostage next to funding for a new bridge in their state.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

They usually make the larger bills so that people don’t read it. Then they can slip in things they know would never pass.

7

Anonymous #5 13w

agreed.

5

Anonymous #1 13w

There would be more to get done but things would get done faster. There would only be negotiations over one thing 30 times rather than 30 things one time yk

3

Anonymous #6 13w

maybe i should be a congressman cuz shawty broke asf

3