Wishing death on people. Also wdym “hurt innocent people” what are you on?

155

Wouldn’t even matter. I’m a Republican who stopped supporting Trump. Regardless, even if I was a Democrat (I have many of their values, or at least old values), wishing death on anyone is wrong, and makes you worse than the person you’re wishing death on. Finally, I’m an Orthodox Christian (catechumen at the moment). My religion is more important than politics.

97

Anonymous #1 1w

So to be clear; you mean you stopped supporting Trump meaning you voted for him and now regret it?

-16

Anonymous OP 1w

Wasn’t old enough at the time unfortunately. But yes I would’ve voted for him over Kamala (I was too young to know the bias against Trump during the 2020 election and was rooting for Biden). Of course, while I support some of his actions (like the border and strength), I oppose his war, tariffs, and his relationship to Israel. Most of our government (not sure about Judicial but certainly the other two) are controlled by AIPAC.

38

Anonymous #1 1w

So the liability for sexual abuse didn’t deter you, as a christian, from wanting to support him? Or his lawsuit from when he was charged by the FBI for racial discrimination in his properties? That didn’t bother you either, as a christian you could dismiss grown men being accused of shoving their fingers into women’s vaginas without consent and barring black tenants from being on your property due to their race?

115

The FBI found evidence of racial discrimination, evidence he didn’t contest during the court case. The jury found him liable for sexual abuse because criminally the statute of limitations was exceeded. Is it moral as a christian to support a sexual abuser?

86

You didn’t wanna answer, how peculiar

57

Anonymous OP 1w

You literally JUST replied bruh 😭 No way you’re trying to play games. Obviously as Christians we don’t support sexual abuse. Of course we’ll pray for all of those involved, but they have to face accountability, whether through jail or paying back their victim through civil court.

-24

Anonymous #1 1w

It’s not wishing death on anyone. He’s dead. It’s okay and good to celebrate when fascist propagandists die. Everyone should be happy about Trumps top propagandist dying

49

Anonymous #1 1w

That isn’t what I asked. Him being found liable for sexual abuse and having evidence of racial discrimination didn’t deter you wanting to support him?

35

Anonymous OP 1w

Because many false rumors have been made about him while others (like Bill Clinton and more) aren’t even remotely talked about.

-17

Anonymous #2 1w

Wasn’t a fascist. Wishing death on someone just because of their freedom of speech is fascism.

-4

See the problem is that you don’t understand why is was a civil lawsuit lmfao. It’s not because he didn’t do it, it was because of the statute of limitations and how New York law classified “sexual abuse” and “rape” as different things at the time of the crime.

33

Anonymous #1 1w

A jury found him liable that is not just rumors. The FBI charged him and during the court case he did not contest the evidence the FBI found. Answer what I asked.

48

Anonymous OP 1w

Fuck him So it was just a joke I see

13

Anonymous #4 1w

Just offending the right with their own hypocrisy again

14

Anonymous #1 1w

Weirdo

43

Anonymous OP 1w

Yes. I said that. He absolutely should be called out for it. So why are you doing the same thing and thinking you’re on a moral pedestal for it this time around

41

Anonymous #1 1w

A jury of 9 found him liable of sexual abuse and the judge even stated that by how rape is defined today Trump did indeed rape Carroll

39

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m trying to offend MAGA lol. Civility only works if both sides are willing to do it

22

Anonymous OP 1w

I see… even then polarization has just been exhausting I feel like tons of people (that unironically do this sort of stuff) need a wake up call, that’s why I reacted the way I did

10

Anonymous #3 1w

The people who are doing this stuff unironically are MAGA and republicans.

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Dude there are people on the left doing it unironically too, I literally saw dozens of people celebrating Chuck Norris’s death yesterday because of his politics. This is why i’ve distanced away from political parties, it seems no one wants to hold their own people accountable.

14

Anonymous #3 1w

So to be clear; regardless of what you believe no matter how heinous it is it’s wrong to be happy that someone is dead?

8

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m sorry, where did I mention Trump anywhere? I supported Charlie and his non violent ways of debate, but I’m not a Trump supporter.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

I believe it is wrong to openly celebrate the death of someone who wasn’t an active threat to the physical safety and wellbeing of others (or sought to be one themselves).

17

Anonymous #3 1w

That’s not what I asked, yes or no come on you’re not an idiot you can read.

3

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

You have the IQ of a stop sign.

20

Anonymous #10 1w

Some of them actively do they’re just too dumb to realize it

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Because I support one and not the other? You can’t possibly be this dense.

2

Anonymous OP 1w

I told you exactly what I believe. You can do with that information what you will.

18

Anonymous #3 1w

I didn’t ask for a vague statement of what you believe. I asked a clear question. Regardless of the heinous beliefs someone has, being happy anyone is dead, is wrong?

5

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

No moron. Read my post, and then read the screenshot. Then think for 10 seconds so I don’t have to spend 15 explaining the reason I posted this.

15

Anonymous #11 1w

Idiotic

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Your iq is obviously room temp.

13

Anonymous OP 1w

explain what’s idiotic about my comment and the relevancy of urs

0

Anonymous OP 1w

I read it. Here’s the thing: this was a post about Charlie. Nowhere, and I mean nowhere, was Trump mentioned.

10

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

What do you think I was trying to do here, infer what you think my point was.

4

Anonymous #11 1w

The relevancy of the quote I gave in my post but replacing the name?

6

Anonymous OP 1w

That Trump is harming innocent people? Yes, I’m well aware. In fact, I agree with you, which is one of the reasons I am not a Trump supporter. I’m just curious as to why you believe Charlie does the same thing.

5

Anonymous OP 1w

sorry but that doesn’t make it relevant cuz what trump did is also wrong? two wrongs don’t make a right???? pls tell me the actual relevancy of showing a ss of trump saying something that’s wrong. read what i’m saying WHAT TRUMP DID WAS WRONG ok just so u see it again now what? is all ur saying that its right to be like trump cuz u seem to hate him but u rlly do love using him as an example, and do exactly what he did

0

Anonymous OP 1w

And I told you what I believed. All you’re trying to do is pin me in a corner by misrepresenting my viewpoint as a black-and-white response of your own.

15

Anonymous #3 1w

You’re not asking me in good faith. You denied people on one side were behaving in such a way and when I pointed out that, yes it was happening, you immediately tried to shift the goalposts.

21

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m 100% asking in good faith. I just dispute the logic you presented. Go ahead.

-2

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

No moron. It’s not my opinion, if you take issue with it you take issue with what Trump said.

-3

Anonymous OP 1w

I obviously do, I’m not a Trump supporter?

9

Anonymous #11 1w

The relevancy is that I didn’t say it. It’s not my words. All I did was change the name to prove that right wingers only get offended when it’s a left leaning person sayin it about a right wing figure and not the other way around. Christ you guys are not smart lol

5

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

I didn’t say you were you moron

-1

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

he believes that because we don’t support being happy about sum1 dying who just so happens to be a right winger that you support all right wingers trump included

8

Anonymous OP 1w

If you were asking in good faith then why do you want to know something other than exactly what I believe

16

Anonymous #11 1w

Absolutely. Buddy is in for a rude awakening when he realizes that Trump and Charlie aren’t the same person

9

Anonymous OP 1w

u could’ve said a left wing activist i would’ve said the same thing if u were trump i would say the same thing it doesn’t matter u said it even if it’s the exact same words YOU changed them so YOU said them it’s not a matter of who it’s a matter of the idea itself which btw i did speak out against trump and said the same things that it’s not right to be happy about someone’s death there are a minuscule amount of exceptions these are not one of them

3

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

just look at my thread with him i’ve shut him down and he’s stating things that just are pointless and not even true like it’s so sad that people are so blind to a divide that’s so obvious

3

Anonymous #11 1w

I didn’t say anything about Charlie Kirk’s death lol. I never actually stated my opinion.

1

Anonymous #11 1w

You’re crying about a divide while being offended by words I didn’t write lol

-1

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

You’re in for a rude awakening when you realize I never called you a Trump supporter

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

Yet you replied to my comment with a Trump quote. You assumed my beliefs and it came back to bite you.

4

Anonymous #11 1w

Yes, I didn’t write that moron. Thanks for proving my point

1

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

Show me when I did! I showed you the screenshot to show you that it was never my opinion to begin with. Show me when I called you a Trump supporter! I’ll wait, moron

5

Anonymous _uncle_sams_horniest_ 1w

don’t argue with him look at what he said

9

Anonymous #3 1w

Because that’s the question I asked. If you were engaging in good faith why wouldn’t you answer the direct question?

-3

Anonymous OP 1w

ur actually dumb u wrote it u had to write and post it 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ cuz last i check trump said that abt rob and u said it abt charlie

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Yeah, show me one time where I actually state my opinion. I copy and pasted a quote to prove a point of hypocrisy from the right

2

Anonymous #11 1w

I didn’t actually, I copy pasted. I didn’t type a single word out. I typed that first portion but not the actual take that followed

1

Anonymous OP 1w

u said it this is ur post

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Didn’t do it. Try again moron

6

Anonymous OP 1w

ur post

6

Anonymous OP 1w

so this isn’t ur post? who made this post cuz i’m trump didn’t

0

Anonymous #11 1w

ik*

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Because the question you asked me is loaded. You’re trying to get me to admit something I don’t exactly believe so it’s easier for you to attack instead of talking to me in good faith. That’s called strawmanning.

16

Anonymous #11 1w

My post was to offend the right with their hypocrisy lol. You’re just mad that you can’t argue with me on my intent

1

Anonymous #11 1w

You being confused doesn’t surprise me

4

Anonymous #3 1w

It’s not loaded! It’s contesting your stance. You said it’s never okay, so regardless of their beliefs it’s NEVER okay?

-7

Anonymous OP 1w

if i drive drunk and i get into a car accident i didn’t intend to crash right? i’d still get blamed for crashing doesnt matter ur “intentions” u still said it doesn’t matter if u took someone else’s words to say it doesn’t make it right to say? doesn’t change the fact that u posted it? you changed it enough to make it the meaning and opinion of YOUR post just saying

1

Anonymous #11 1w

You’re trying to equate a post on YY to a DUI crash? That’s so idiotic lol. Try again, this time don’t rely on a false equivalency to make your idiotic point

1

Anonymous OP 1w

And I told you what my stance is. It’s not Kryptos, you can pretty easily see what I believe. I explicitly said it.

13

Anonymous OP 1w

i’m take a note from ur book and saying sum bs that isn’t relevant if u don’t like it don’t do it 😭🙏

5

Anonymous #11 1w

So you admit it wasn’t relevant lol. Great work moron lmaooo

1

Anonymous OP 1w

🤦‍♂️

0

Anonymous #3 1w

So you refuse to answer either questions that contest that stance slightly?

-6

Anonymous #11 1w

Yeah that’s how I feel having to explain simple concepts to you

2

Anonymous OP 1w

r ur feelings hurt? because u didn’t get enough attention from ur parents my bs is more relevant than ur ss of trump cuz i said it was bs not that it wasn’t relevant

10

Anonymous OP 1w

how long was ur bus? must’ve been tiny no?

0

Anonymous #11 1w

Is being mentally handicapped a bad thing? Do you really want to make fun of disabled people after crying about divisive rhetoric?

11

Anonymous #11 1w

You admitted what you just argued wasn’t relevant lmao. Try again hurry up lol

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m not answering a question that misrepresents what I say so you can feel like you won an internet argument.

16

Anonymous OP 1w

i mean u obviously don’t care about the division if u did u wouldn’t make posts like this it widens the divide so pretty reasonable that ur comprehension skills are sub par

0

Anonymous OP 1w

would that not mean urs isn’t relevant cuz i’m just copying u its either “relevant” like ur ss or their both irrelevant

8

Anonymous #11 1w

Would you typing about a car crash mean me quoting someone in my post and then showing the quote is irrelevant?

1

Anonymous #3 1w

That’s a strawman lol

-7

Anonymous #11 1w

Didn’t answer. Try again.

8

Anonymous OP 1w

i mean they both have around the same relevance so you tell me

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Didn’t answer. Try again, yes or no

1

Anonymous OP 1w

first the fact u believe i was talking abt the mentally handicapped shows ur stand on it and there’s nothing wrong with it unless its u ur the person being made “fun” of

3

Anonymous OP 1w

didn’t answer either bud like i said u tell me wether or not they’re both relevant or not?

11

Anonymous #11 1w

Didn’t answer. Try again. Hurry. I’m waiting

1

Anonymous OP 1w

still didn’t answer i’m waiting

5

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s what you’re trying to do. People do this all the time in speech and debate and even in politics and law.

17

Anonymous #11 1w

So let’s get this straight, you were questioning if I was mentally disabled and you tried to make fun of that fact? Even though there’s nothing wrong with anyone who’s unfortunate enough to be in that position. Gross for you to be okay with mocking an entire group of already vulnerable people. I fully support them and their struggles, you bringing them up because I offended you says a lot about your interest in not being divisive lol

6

Anonymous #3 1w

It’s quite literally not lol

-7

Anonymous #11 1w

Yea this is my post. You’re answering first.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

when did i bring the mentally handicapped tho? i just asked if ur bus was short no?

0

Anonymous OP 1w

So then why are you trying to make me admit I believe something other than why I already told you

21

Anonymous OP 1w

so ur trying to impose urself on to people i wonder how else u do that very wrong of u

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Me commenting is offending you now? lmao

1

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m trying to get you to answer a question.

4

Anonymous OP 1w

when did u offend me?

7

Anonymous #11 1w

Not an answer. Try again. Hurry up. I’ll wait since you thinking mocking the disabled is funny

6

Anonymous #11 1w

When I caught you mocking the disabled I imagine. That or when I caught you admitting that you brought up something you didn’t think was relevant

5

Anonymous OP 1w

when did i mock them?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

And I told you what I believe.

14

Anonymous #11 1w

Not an answer. Try again! You can pretend to be dumb but it won’t work

7

Anonymous #3 1w

Great, now I’m asking a clarification question.

4

Anonymous OP 1w

oh so ur trump ss is irrelevant?

5

Anonymous #11 1w

“you brought something up you didn’t think was relevant” you is a key term there. Not something I brought up.

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Thanks for not denying you mocked the disabled that proves my point easily lmao

1

Anonymous OP 1w

oh i hadn’t replied to that yet lol i just wanted to say that you admit that ur ss is irrelevant but when did i mention the disabled?

4

Anonymous OP 1w

like i said before i said something equivalent to ur ss

5

Anonymous #11 1w

So you think your own argument was irrelevant? lmao

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Go ahead! I’m waiting

5

Anonymous OP 1w

i said that it’s equal to ur ss so if u think ur ss is irrelevant ig my argument is as well but only if urs is since they are equal

3

Anonymous OP 1w

like i asked when did i mock them i never brought them up i think u did?

2

Anonymous #11 1w

And I’ll answer once you do! You chose to mock them and bring up the disabled as a gotcha now you’re being faced with the reality of what you chose to say hurry

9

Anonymous #11 1w

So again, you typed an entire paragraph that you personally (and incorrectly) think was equally as irrelevant as something else.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

so ur saying the ss is irrelevant?

4

Anonymous OP 1w

i never brought up the disabled u did

2

Anonymous #11 1w

No. Are you intentionally being dense or are you just like this?

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Okay! I’ll play into this game! Explain the short bus comment then. I’ll wait!

6

Anonymous OP 1w

so then what i said isn’t irrelevant

5

Anonymous OP 1w

i was just wondering the size of ur bus can i not do that? what does the bus size have to do with mentally handicapped?

0

Anonymous #11 1w

What’s the relevancy of bus sizes?

4

Anonymous #11 1w

Not an answer. Try again.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

curiosity?

0

Anonymous #11 1w

You saying the word curiosity doesn’t actually substantiate how it’s relevant to a conversation about quoting someone. Try again. How is it relevant?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

Wait a second are you that bot again? I remember you said to me “Go ahead! I’m waiting.”

7

Anonymous OP 1w

i did answer? i said curiosity

0

Anonymous #11 1w

Go ahead. Easy question. I’ll even be nice and explain why you’re wrong after you answer. I’ll give you that privilege

4

Anonymous #11 1w

Explain how you being curious about bus sizes has anything to do with Charlie Kirk or Donald Trump.

8

Anonymous OP 1w

what’s the relavancy of it being relevant

5

Anonymous OP 1w

so r u saying ur always right? no matter what hmmmmmm narcissism to the max

5

Anonymous #11 1w

That’s not an answer. Try again moron

4

Anonymous #11 1w

So there was no relevancy. What does a bus size tell you about me or my beliefs?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

all u can say is try again keep begging

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Great I’ll answer for you. You’re just like this. You’ve lost any actual argument lol

4

Anonymous OP 1w

What is there to clarify, I told you what I believe

7

Anonymous OP 1w

so i’ve won since u keep saying everyone else lost and u just decide other people lost no wonder u have a god complex huh no wonder ur happy charlie died crazy

4

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m asking for further explanation, and the question pushes for further. You refusing is so bad faith it’s funny to me you tried to claim I was engaging in bad faith

5

Anonymous #11 1w

I’m saying you’re wrong. And I was happy to explain why but you chose not to answer lol

5

Anonymous #11 1w

Nothing to say?

9

Anonymous OP 1w

is it not bad faith to be happy charlie died in my opinion that’s inhumane you probably enjoyed when u found out abt his death and are using trump as an excuse to post this

2

Anonymous OP 1w

you believe im wrong and i guess ur beliefs are the truth since you have a god complex

2

Anonymous #11 1w

You are objectively incorrect about the assertion of my position. And I was happy to explain why but you gave up because I was refusing to let you avoid a question lol

4

Anonymous #11 1w

What does bus size tell you about me or my beliefs in this conversation?

2

Anonymous OP 1w

what question? and what am i incorrect about you said ur happy that charlie is dead u being happy about his death just shows ur god complex

6

Anonymous #1 1w

Based off the multiple rewrites of the Bible, God didn’t care about even innocent people dying. If you eat animals, I don’t see why you’d have an issue with people dying given the fact that people can be utter monsters, they can and do commit acts against others that are so vile it’d traumatize a normal person just seeing or reading about it. Kirk didn’t deserve a platform, I found his beliefs disgusting and inhumane, I wouldn’t necessarily say he deserved to be shot, but I def do think some ppl

17

Anonymous OP 1w

can one not be curious about the man with the god complex’s bus size do u want me to bow down to u since u think ur a god?

1

Anonymous #11 1w

What does the size of the bus I got on, tell you about me or my beliefs? Shouldn’t be a hard question to answer if you weren’t trying to imply something

2

Anonymous OP 1w

like i stated before it was a question to satiate my curiosity no?

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Are you being intentionally dense about my position or are you just genuinely under this ridiculous belief? That was my question. If you want to answer I’ll happily explain why you’re *objectively* incorrect.

6

Anonymous #11 1w

And what was the purpose of being curious? What does my answer on the bus size tell you about me or my beliefs?

-3

Anonymous OP 1w

your position is that you are happy about charlies death like u said in ur post

4

Anonymous #1 1w

-some ppl are so vile that they should not be around. Like child predators, rpists (against animals or humans), ppl who trafficked others, ppl who abuse animals or humans, etc. There is way too many abhorrent acts ppl commit that certainly don’t deserve mercy/humanity.

13

Anonymous OP 1w

can 1 not be curios? does u the “god” believe curiosity is bad?

1

Anonymous #11 1w

That’s not an answer. I’m asking are you 1. Being dense on purpose or 2. Truly under this belief Which one is it?

3

Anonymous #11 1w

That’s not an answer. I didn’t ask if you believed I didn’t allow curiosity. I’m asking what does my answer tell you; about my beliefs? Go ahead.

7

Anonymous #1 1w

During 2016 elections, I was 12. I was a child and still knew he was bad. I didn’t like Trump based off the disgusting and predatory comments he made towards women/children . Which were public and televised. His qualities are terrible and always have been. Lies, Idiocy, predatory, racist, sexist, the list goes on. He was never a respectable candidate.

10

Anonymous OP 1w

r u being rude to the disabled? what is ur definition of dense is this why u keep bring up the disabled because u hate us?

3

Anonymous OP 1w

You don’t even know what bad faith means. You’re just using words you heard me say. I told you what I believe.

5

Anonymous #3 1w

Alright if you refuse to clarify then I will just have to go off of my assumption. I have you ample opportunity

0

Anonymous #11 1w

Not an answer. 1 or 2 which is it?

3

Anonymous OP 1w

gave*

8

Anonymous #11 1w

Oh you’re disabled. I’ll accommodate how I talk to you from now on!

5

Anonymous OP 1w

so u believe the mentally handicapped are less than u

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Thank you! What does my bus size tell you about me or my beliefs? Still going to avoid answering?

-2

Anonymous #11 1w

No of course not! You do. I just don’t give respect to implied rap*ists like you lol

4

Anonymous OP 1w

like i said curiosity i don’t have to explain my curiosity do i?

0

Anonymous OP 1w

rap*ist? now explain that to me?

3

Anonymous #11 1w

Sure! Once you answer the last few questions honestly and directly I will!

3

Anonymous #11 1w

So you can’t answer because you were trying to mock the disabled. Got it!

0

Anonymous OP 1w

no please how am i an implied r

2

Anonymous OP 1w

last i checked ur the one who believes the disabled are less than u

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Just go off of what I told you to believe. I don’t think it’s morally okay to openly celebrate the death of someone that didn’t harm the physical safety and wellbeing of people, or didn’t seek to do so.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Correction, -what I told you I* believe-, not -what I told you to believe-.

4

Anonymous #11 1w

You answering my question directly would prove me wrong but you can’t do it lol

-1

Anonymous #11 1w

I’ll tell you. Once you answer. Go ahead diddler

3

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m asking for clarification on what you believe in reference to this specific thing. That’s the point of the question. You’re saying you don’t want to answer because of perceived strawmanning or bad faith. When I’ve been very clear how it’s not just because you claim it to be. I’m confused on your stance, if you’d like to clarify please do so! For example, if a neo nazi who believes all minorities should be burned alive dies, it’s immoral for me to be happy at his death?

6

Anonymous OP 1w

hey just because i like miners doesn’t make me a diddler 😤😤😤

2

Anonymous #11 1w

Oh okay so you’re into children too lmao. Got it! Go ahead and answer so I can tell you what you’d like to know. We’re waiting on you

4

Anonymous OP 1w

no i like miners not minors yk very different from ur type i like the ones that mine things u like the ones in elementary

2

Anonymous OP 1w

HOLD UP TOO YOU LIKE KIDS

5

Anonymous #11 1w

You admitted you liked kids lol. That’s not what I expected, thanks for outing yourself kid diddler lol

5

Anonymous OP 1w

ur the kid diddler

3

Anonymous #11 1w

you admitted you liked kids lmao I didn’t even have to bring that out of you; you just said it cause you wanted to

4

Anonymous OP 1w

i said i like miners not minors and ur words are oh so you’re into children too stating ur into children

4

Anonymous #11 1w

You said you liked children kid diddler. Anything else you want to admit?

2

Anonymous OP 1w

since when were miners kids?

2

Anonymous #11 1w

You said you liked r*ping kids lmao. What else do you have to say about them? I worry for the kids in your local area

1

Anonymous OP 1w

u like r*ping mentally disabled kids that’s mad weird u should go seek professional help

2

Anonymous #11 1w

You like r*ping mentally disabled kids? Holy shit that’s disgusting

1

You think it’s funny that people get r*ped. No wonder you said you liked r*ping kids

3

Anonymous #12 1w

Holy shit, you’re an asshole 😭

5

Anonymous #17 1w

Not sure if you meant that at 12

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Thats a comment from trump, not charlie kirk, did you really think you just did sum

6

Anonymous #21 1w

I’m not sad he died at all except for maybe his kids but im also not going to espouse rhetoric that boils down to “yeah we need more of this, as long as it’s directed to my political enemies”

0

Anonymous #23 1w

1. I’m not wishing death on anyone. He’s already dead 2. cope

1

Anonymous #19 1w

What does the comment from Trump say? Quote it

0

Anonymous #1 1w

So wishing death on Hitler would’ve made you worse than Hitler?

17

Anonymous OP 1w

Shit you right, lowkey didn’t look and thought it was one of your comments. You can see the resemblance tho

1

Anonymous #17 1w

I’m definitely not nice, I just didn’t want 12 to catch a stray

3

Anonymous #24 1w

That’s what 3 argued too

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I don’t even like trump. I fear you’re rage baiting.

0

Anonymous #23 1w

I didn’t say you did 🤯🤯

4

Anonymous OP 1w

I feel like trump is a different case and i do actually hope he dies because he’s an actual abuser and rapist and is in a position to hurt tons of people. Kirk was a grifting weasel with no morals, but as far as we know was not an abuser or had convictions or allegations. Kirk is someone we just don’t like, and when you start wishing death on people you simply don’t like then you’ve lost the plot. And thats where the majority of people are rn and its part of why everything is so fucked up

0

Anonymous #25 1w

He argued that no matter the age or cause (rape even) women should never have an abortion. He even said this applied to his own underage daughter if it were to ever happen. People unfortunately listened to him and this could impact a child’s future. An abortion does not stop someone from having PLANNED kids down the line, or saves women’s lives and prevents kids from being born into a home that doesn’t want them.

1

Anonymous #25 1w

The irony that people pick on is that since he got shot and killed there’s not much sympathy because he was against gun control and would tell people it was worth human deaths in order to own a gun. He literally didn’t care about others lives why should people who didn’t know him care about his?

6

Anonymous #29 1w

Quote this first and I will

1

Anonymous #29 1w

So he is the founder of turning point USA which provides financial support to conservative candidates running in government. Most conservative candidates are against abortion. Ever heard of an ectopic pregnancy? Look it up, it kills. These financial decisions by turning point are also illegal as 501(c)(3) prohibits organizations/charities from political aid in campaigns.

6

Anonymous #21 1w

1. I’m not wishing death on anyone. He’s already dead. 2.

-1

Anonymous #3 1w

people deserve polarization for supporting pedophilia. OP isn’t pushing the belief that we SHOULD MURDER people that don’t agree with our viewpoints (at this point it’s more of a morality standpoint though) but that doesn’t mean that because we see the President of the United States saying that he’s happy someone is dead, that you can take the same approach in the opposite direction. If anything, Dump was more worried about his big beautiful ballroom than his main dick-rider dying.

5

Anonymous OP 1w

Seriously what kind of self righteous fuckass logic is that lmao

11

Anonymous OP 1w

That has nothing to do with Charlie. So are you going to substantiate your claim or not

1

Anonymous #28 1w

Epic red herring and non sequitur. You are assuming tpusa policies caused specific harm. And you still aren’t substantiating the “illegal” funds claim. You aren’t even provided a money trail. I’d be more inclined to believe you if there was any evidence given, yet it’s null and void. And better yet, if they were guilty of the last part you listed, that’s such a pathetic way to be glad someone is dead. Regardless, you should substantiate or not provide discourse you don’t know about

1

Anonymous #29 1w

Yes I will, once you quote the screenshot I sent in response to your first comment. We’re waiting on you here.

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

What trump said the other day has nothing to do with what you said on your post

1

Anonymous #29 1w

I tell you to give your opinion on the screenshot. I told you to quote it. Hurry up so we can move on.

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m not engaging in your red herring it’s up to you to substantiate your claim

1

Anonymous #29 1w

You calling it a red herring doesn’t actually make it one. Try again. Once you quote it, we can continue with the actual conversation. You being stubborn isn’t good faith lol. Hurry up now.

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m acting in good faith by not engaging in a red herring. I’ll explain how it’s a red herring. You claim your happy Charlie kirk is dead. What’s relevant is what Charlie kirk did. You’re introducing trump being glad someone is dead. Trump is irrelevant to Charlie kirk in this content

1

Anonymous #29 1w

You calling it one doesn’t logically make it one. This is the only condition of engaging with me so I’m aware you’re willing to acknowledge and accept the evidence I’ve provided. If you’re not willing to do that, that’s on you. As soon as you do that, we can continue. Truly I don’t know why you intend on acting in bad faith when you’re clearly able to see what a good faith debate can be

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m sure gatekeeping qualifies as bad faith this is insane🤣🤣🤣

1

Anonymous #29 1w

All you have to do in order for us to continue is quote what the picture lol. If that’s too hard or too complicated for you then I can understand why you’re trying so hard to avoid it

-1