General on Sidechat | no still doesn’t make sense because for women it’s framed as allowing something shameful to be done to them. if it were framed that way for men they, according to you, would be trying “harder” to do something shameful which is even more embarrassing

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

General 5w

no still doesn’t make sense because for women it’s framed as allowing something shameful to be done to them. if it were framed that way for men they, according to you, would be trying “harder” to do something shameful which is even more embarrassing

This post is unavailable

Anonymous 5w

It is shameful, to let that many people literally use you, i don’t think you understand what it means to chase and to be chased

Anonymous

#1 5w

well there you go why is it letting them use you rather than her using them? why can’t she desire them just for sex?

Anonymous

OP 5w

Sure she can desire sex but she lets them enter through her gates vs a man literally going out and putting in effort to get that. The energy it takes to achieve the same result isnt the equivalent, that’s exactly why it’s different. It’s like trying to find gold vs wood. Wood is vastly abundant, whereas gold is not so to attain it is a hard task. One is worth more effort than the other but both still have their own inherent value but also while being unequal.

-1

Anonymous

#1 5w

I don’t think you understand that sex doesn’t have to be one sided. It isn’t automatically one party “using” the other for their pleasure. It SHOULDN’T be that.