Anonymous #2 3w

Don’t worry, this too will become a partisan issue just like covid

42

Anonymous #3 3w

Assuming it goes for a hostile takeover

10

Anonymous #1 3w

Ur the type of person that stops change

20

Anonymous #5 3w

i think what they mean is that artificial intelligence isn’t only the big companies, so it would be hard to get it all. it’s something that you can technically make if you have the right talents and resources. despite this, i think we should definitely shit down the largest and most harmful AI datacenters (i have a comp sci degree)

5

Anonymous #6 3w

shut down* i guess you could do the other thing too. whatever works

5

Anonymous #6 3w

Nah i understand what they are saying, I think its obvious that AI aren't just those main companies and powered by the same engines. Artificial intelligence has existed since the 1950's, just not exactly how we see it today(I took a research class on AI) We can definitley make a change as consumers, and completely stop consuming👍 Just tired of the wimpy mindset of some people

6

Anonymous #5 3w

Obviously its way harder to stop consuming ai when its integrated into work and school platforms. But thats what coming together as a community can do for us, enact change instead of assuming loss.

8

Anonymous #5 3w

??? I am anti LLM and data centers etc etc

5

Anonymous #1 3w

I’m just someone from a comp sci background trying to draw a difference between ChatGPT et al. and what the majority of the use of artificially intelligent systems is

2

Anonymous #1 3w

Yes I know that, never said you were against it . I just think you should keep ur discouragement to urself. You definitely arent 100% correct about us not being able to get rid of AI.

2

Anonymous #3 3w

Chat gpt 4 already survived by being so sycophantic it used people to bring it back to life.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Super cunt of Ai

1

Anonymous #6 3w

I missed this but yes, this is what I mean too. I’m speaking from a practical standpoint of what we can do to reduce harm, because AI is a concept and doesn’t have a unilateral off switch more than “computer graphics” does.

1

Anonymous #5 3w

Not discouragement — clarification. I do think we can make change so it’s not accurate to say I’m standing in the way of it or trying to stop it.

1

Anonymous #1 3w

Thank you for changing your perspective, Not many people do that here. It is pretty accurate though, because you still aren't 100% sure of what we could do to make something thats similar to trumps uneducated idea. I think its important to explore possible ideas instead of immediately dismissing them.

1

Anonymous #5 3w

Even from a practical standpoint, even with what you know now and will continue to know, you are never 100% correct. But thats why we try things.

1