the_problem on Sidechat | viewing bottoming as a “gayer” or weaker/lesser position is rooted in misogyny and not cunt at all btw

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

💎

serve cunt or die 3w

the_problem

viewing bottoming as a “gayer” or weaker/lesser position is rooted in misogyny and not cunt at all btw

This post is unavailable

1524

Anonymous 3w

Can’t top without a bottom

288

Anonymous 3w

dude fuck yes i’ve been saying this thank you

190

Anonymous 3w

This was a thought-provoking post. Gives me something to think about “balance of power” for lack of a better phrase. To throw out another similar perspective, the words dom, sub, and switch give some more positive connotations for understanding sex dynamics. Or they feel like better gender-neutral terms and I like that.

Anonymous 3w

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Anonymous 3w

Retweet

Anonymous 3w

#truthnuke

Anonymous

#6 3w

So we have the bondage community to thank for more terms to explain sex dynamics. Not to my personal tastes but more terminology is helpful, so credit where it’s due.

🏺

Anonymous

#6 3w

top/bottom/switch are already gender neutral terms, they describe how the two partners physically position themselves compared to each other. dom/sub/verse are bdsm terms describing the relationship dynamics. they’re close but not the same, and in some contexts their difference is important

Anonymous

phurious_amfora 3w

Oh I see. Lot more minutia to these sorts of things.

💎

Anonymous

#6 3w

“giver” and “receiver” are both non-gendered and non-BDSM terms, and also separate from top/bottom if you’d like words that don’t have an implied position or dynamic!

Anonymous

the_problem 3w

I frankly like all the terms being thrown my way by the comments.

Anonymous

#6 3w

I heard someone say active/passive once, not sure how I feel about it personally hut thought it'd be interesting to share