Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
I think that people nudity doesn’t have to be considered sexual but there’s a reason that flashing someone without consent is wrong. The nuance here is that while some ppl uphold the social contract about clothing bc of purity, others just don’t want that
Hot take: this shouldn’t be considered crazy at all. The idea of nudity being inherently sexual and of sexuality being dirty is a judeo-christian value that has been applied unequally to women as a way of body policing. Nudity is normal in many cultures.
upvote 48 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

This is not how social structures work diva

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

Everyone is subject to the same conditioning. Just because you don't like to see nudity doesn't mean your culture is supreme. Supremacy is a very American evil.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

The United States is based on implicit consent. If you want a nation with explicit consent, consider disowning the US and working towards its abolishment. Complaining about citizen noncompliance in a system that never truly offered consent is so fucking tone deaf.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

And not to mention nudity and flashing are not even the same fucking thing lmao log off.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Nudity in a space where not everyone consented to it being okay is flashing. Nudity in a space where it’s expected like a nude beach or nude sauna is different.

upvote 1 downvote