The world we live in is so backwards bc why do we argue whether or not female rape victims should be allowed to have an abortion or not instead of arguing whether or not the rapist gets to keep his balls??!?!?!? Istg I’m gonna go fucking crazy
Having a man’s balls chopped off for graping would be unconstitutional in the U.S… however, there should be exceptions for crimes of this nature so we can do this to scum.
15
Anonymous2d
Cruel and unusual punishment prevents this but there should be exceptions…
13
Anonymous1d
Cause we are all just cattle to the elite.
11
Anonymous1d
the victim should be allowed to squeeze them til they rupture IMO
10
Anonymous1d
Sitting ducks in the pond following the bread.
8
Anonymous#91d
exceptions for what??
1
Anonymous#21d
Exceptions for being against the law due to the constitution. R@pișts shouldn’t be included when it comes to cruel punishment
21
Anonymous#91d
i genuinely cannot tell what you’re going on about can you reword this
3
Anonymous#21d
Sorry didn’t reply but the message is below
5
Anonymous#91d
ohhh okay i understand now and i agree
4
Anonymous#91d
I think chemical castration is legal
34
Anonymous#121d
Bare in mind some of the sickos may enjoy that so idk if that’s a good call
8
Anonymous#91d
If the death sentence exists then I’m sure chopping off balls is just fine
8
Anonymous#31d
it should be up to the victim ofc!! but im sure there would be more women that enjoy it than men and even if the sicko does itll be the last time they enjoy anything :)
8
Anonymous#914h
I don’t know if this would count as cruel and unusual, it has historic precedence in other cultures so not unusual. we still use the band method on livestock today, and chemically it wouldn’t hurt, so I don’t think it could be counted as cruel either