
Anecdotal evidence means nothing to a stranger on the internet. Let’s take the third term for example. A study done by Scoop showed that out of a select number of republican voters, 53% supported a third term. Same with taking greenland, among his base once he said it, over 40 million advocated for the same thing.
Just bc they support a third term doesn’t mean they think it’s gonna actually happen. They aren’t gonna storm congress and demand a 3rd term from an 80 yr old. I support cutting cancer research IF there is proof of not using money correctly. Throwing money at something doesn’t make it right. We’re throwing money at the department of education, but kids are stupid. the vast vast majority of republicans support releasing the Epstein files. I know ONE person that doesn’t. You can say “anecdotal
I don’t defend it. I think him doing that and calling everybody stupid like that when that was one of the things he ran off of was stupid. Also, the one time republicans do something like that when democrats do shit like riots all the time. Democrats are wayyyy more violent than republicans.
So they support an unconstitutional proposal because he’s publicly played with running for a third term. Thats what I mean. With no regard for the law or conditional support they would support him in this decision, because they idolize HIM. Can you prove that there was fraud or misused funds for the cancer research? Because people supported that with, what evidence exactly? I didn’t bring up Epstein for a reason.
He doesn’t actually think he’s gonna get a third term. The dude is 80. He’s fucking around. Yall don’t know how to take a joke. No I can’t, but I know logically that just bc something has a lot of funding doesn’t mean it’s being put to good use. Can’t just throw money at something. No, factually, democrats are more violent. Multiple riots, billions of dollars worth of damages, stolen items from small businesses, bricks being thrown at cars, getting in the face of federal officers just trying to
You’re moving the goalpost. It’s not about logistically working. It’s about the fact people support it just because he said it. Logically according to what? You don’t even know what was cut and you’re defending it. No, factually speaking right wingers are more violent. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-data-shows
Lmao. I forgot about this, my b my b. One of your articles is literally just identity politics and fear mongering, and it mentions Jan. 6. Which we can all agree was bad, but it fails to mention instances like the blm riots, the recent immigration riots, the Charlie Kirk assassination, and more. It mentions how people on the right are making death threats to election officials, which I can probably imagine a few idiots doing that, but don’t say that democrats never make death threats to the
President. Which is, you know, a crime of political violence. Which is by definition, terrorism. Don’t even mention how many people said that Charlie Kirk dying was good, and that he deserved it, and how many memes and jokes are made about it. Which is fine, jokes can be made about it, but don’t make jokes about that, but cry when a gaming log made by kids is wrong. Democrats call people on the right nazis, fascists, racist all the damn time. When none of it has actual basis. It’s just used
To invoke fear and use people’s emotions against them so they can be used against republicans. Democrats don’t actually care about fascism. They want to be the fascists. Democrats don’t care about the police, they want to be the police. Democrats don’t care about anything, they just want power. They are way more violent than republicans, and if you can’t see that then I can’t help you.
So let’s just recap your points 1. No actual rebuttal on the claims of “one side does MORE violence objectively” Just you complaining about how it’s somehow identifying policies with no actual proof. 2. Then you cherry pick instances where the left was violent like that matters when the point is the right does it more OVERALL. Which you didn’t contest with actual proof, just feelings 3. Then you cry about jokes about a dead podcaster.
You didn’t even address all of the studies. You don’t care about facts. You’re happy to let yours delusions and overly emotional brain guide your life. Because I’ve said nothing but literal facts and instead of acknowledging or addressing them like an adult. You move the goalpost or cry about something unrelated.
to add my 2 cents, Marjorie Taylor Green had the left DESPISE her for many many years but never felt truly unsafe. trump turned on her and within 3 days she had to hire security to keep people from harming her. then she quit congress entirely because trumps entire tactic of bullying people to follow him didn’t work. so you can believe whatever nonsense fox news feeds you, or we can look at what’s really happening in the world