Anonymous #2 5w

all of it needs investigated, but don't pretend that internet narratives replace evidence. the standard of guilt doesn’t change because someone is unpopular.

1

Anonymous #2 5w

Amazing false dichotomy to act like the only valid way to come to a conclusion is through a court of law.

1

Anonymous OP 5w

i never said courts are the only way to form conclusions. i said i won’t call someone a pedophile without real evidence. suspicion isn’t proof. investigation is appropriate, public conviction without evidence is not. you're confusing 'people can have opinions’ with ‘people can make criminal accusations without proof.’ those are not the same thing.

1

Anonymous #2 5w

Do you believe there’s any reason for a child to lie about being sexually assaulted by an adult she doesn’t have a longstanding relationship to?

1

Anonymous OP 5w

ofc children can be victims, and every allegation of abuse should be taken seriously & fully investigated. that doesn’t mean every accusation is automatically proof of guilt. there are documented cases of false or mistaken accusations, sometimes due to coaching, confusion, trauma, misunderstanding, or third-party influence (have witnessed this working in law & its more frequent than you'd think). acknowledging that reality does not minimize real victims; it protects the integrity of justice.

1

Anonymous OP 5w

taking an allegation seriously means investigating it thoroughly. it does not mean declaring someone guilty in public without evidence. those are two different things.

1

Anonymous #2 5w

When did I do anything but express the hypocrisy of MAGA?

1