Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

themunchler

Any republicans/conservatives/right wingers interested in making discussion content rather than debate content?
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

Yall killed the discussion content guy.

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

This comment is unproductive, you’re acting as though you’re aware of anything I participate in

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themunchler 17h

Stop purposefully acting dense.

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

I’m not acting anyway at all, you told me “ya’ll did xyz” and that’s not productive. You have no clue what I do, you’re just associating me with whatever nonsense upset you most recently.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themunchler 17h

Democrats killed Charlie Kirk. He was the one that advocated for discussion. Democrats, and their ideology, killed him. Yall went so far to the left there is no room for discussion anymore

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Are you saying that only charlie kirk believes in discussing politics? That’s just silly. Moreover I’m not a democrat, so if your criticism is party based you’ve picked the wrong one.

upvote 7 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Also I would argue that it was his own ideology that killed him, he literally stated that there have to be gun deaths for gun rights to be guaranteed; can you explain which part of my ideology (of which you have 0 familiarity) led to his death?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themunchler 16h

You’re being dumb on purpose. It isn’t party based, but it is a democrat that did it. Is that not true tho? It isn’t pretty obviously, but the people need the right to bear arms.

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

What does the killer being a democrat have to do with me? I just said that whatever criticisms you might make of democrats aren’t applicable to me 😭

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themunchler 16h

It has to do with you claiming republicans, the whole party, can’t have discussions. I’d argue that’s the only side for discussion. I never said anything about you. Again, you’re being purposefully dumb. I assumed you were a democrat bc you’re talking about the other side. Why would a republican say this about other republicans.

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

I actually never made that claim? I just said that kirk was NOT the “conversation guy.” He was a racist who used the shapiro method to popularize dishonest at best & prejudiced at worst takes. He didn’t even debate well, he was just good at using emotional bait tactics.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themunchler 14h

How was he racist?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 14h
post
upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 14h

He said that if he saw a black pilot he would “hope he’s qualified” (also implying piloting is a male profession) in response to an effort to encourage black female students to become pilots implying that they need to lower standards to have black pilots.

upvote 8 downvote