
None of it's really objective and the lines definitely are blurred. It would be nice if everyone agreed that sex and gender are separate and that male/female is sex and man/woman is gender, but the reality is there are many different perspectives out there on that. I say let people call themselves whatever they see fit. I'm not gonna be the one to tell them they're something else when I can't see into their head.
I don’t think you’re understanding what I’m saying. You can describe me as a human, a female, an adult (definition: a fully grown, mature human [or organism]) or more specifically as a woman (adult human female). The only reason to describe me as a woman (adult human female) is if you want to identify my sex and age. Otherwise you could use adult, human, or person. None of which identify sex. Feelings don’t change facts or definitions. Woman literally means female. Not male.
If it was about human identity then we would just use “person” or “human”. You can substitute human or person for woman without changing the meaning of a sentence. You CANNOT change woman into man and maintain the same meaning. Why? Because each word describes a human of a different sex.
I feel like you admitting that I’m right makes you feel like you’re homophobic or transphobic or something but it’s not either of those things. Definitions are definitions and words have meaning. If you feel like there’s not a word to describe gender without using sex then make up a new word. Don’t be upset that others point out that you’re incorrect.
You’re the one being unobjective and biased. You’re literally arguing against the definition and meaning of a word. Definitions are important. They’re how we communicate. That way if I say “do you see that giant tree?” You know what to look for. Not the small tree or average size trees, but the clearly larger than average one. Tbh this entire debate is ridiculous. If words have no meaning then go tell a random woman on the street that she’s “a fat ugly slag”. Oh wait, you wouldn’t. Why?🧐😂
I do use male and female interchangeably though. Tbh a lot less since a certain group in the feminist community has said that it’s sexist to refer to a woman as a female, but I do use them interchangeably. “Being the only female in a room full of males does make me a little uncomfortable” is something I’ve said & it is vernacularly interchangeable with using men or women in that same sentence.
Or if it’s a child, you’d say “the girl won the award”. Girl/boy are used to describe child males and females, the same way women/men are used to describe adult males and females. “If you feel like there’s not a word to describe gender without using sex then make up a new word”~ #5 I couldn’t have said it better myself
"The girl won the award" is different from "The female won the award" because "girl/woman" implies a social aspect and are inherently inseparable from it. You can separate the social aspect from "female" though. So deductively, woman is used as an emphasis on the social experience of a human female. If I gave you a pink notebook with flowers and fairies on it, you would call it a girl's notebook, not a female's notebook.
You’re enforcing 1950s stereotypes that were forced upon males and females. It’s 2026, boys can and do have pink notebooks with flowers for crying out loud. That’s absolute nonsense. My experience as a woman isn’t made up of flowers and pink. It’s made up of being xx and growing up to be an adult. And no experience of a woman is the same. We’re all different and to be categorizing shit like that STILL in this day and age is unprogressive
Acknowledging gender roles and the role they play in our society is not equivalent to forcing people to "do" gender. Woman is a term used to express the "woman" gender and the norms associated with it (pink, Barbies, nurturing, softness, etc.). Gender is a rigidly defined set of norms within a culture. Whether those norms need to be followed is an entirely different topic.
A woman who dislikes all of those things is still a woman. My aunt is gay and doesn’t wear dresses, hates pink, is tough, etc. she’s still a woman and calls herself as such. Why? Because she’s an adult human female, not because she fits your sexist stereotypes. But OK I’m I’ll be quiet again ✌️🤐🤣
I never said she wasnt a woman? "My" sexist stereotypes...I didnt make those stereotypes and i dont think people should have to follow them, you're calling them my stereotypes because you dont want to engage with understanding my argument. Your aunt is a gender non-conforming woman, and to be gender non-conforming you need a gender, a set of social norms to not conform to. Your aunt affirms her gender via doing what makes HER feel like a woman, not what society says she has to do to be a woman
Well yes, society creates things that cater to women that aren't necessarily biologically based, so we have to designate it as "women's [blank]" and not "female's [blank]. Like women's perfume, women's hobbies, girly drinks, women's hats, women's glasses, women's phone cases, women's workshops, etc. What constitutes as a "woman's" thing is inconsistent across cultures, so "woman" is a flexible term whereas "female" is not.