Should being too-tall count as a disability so that passengers over 6-ft 3-in, or with a back-to-knee length exceeding 28-inch get a free upgrade to premium or exit-row seats, instead of encroaching on other passengers’ space?
I don’t think it should be considered a disability😭 but it should definitely be a free accommodation
56
Anonymous1d
I think we should just make the seating in airplanes roomier and god forbid if they can’t pack as many people on
31
Anonymous1d
As someone who’s 6’8 flying sucks lol. But I’m no different than other people so I feel like I should sit with everyone else although it would be nice to get that privilege. I just pray I always get the emergency exit seat and I’ve gotten it a few times.
12
Anonymous1d
Not disability but free accommodation.
7
Anonymous23h
Is 6’3 even in the 98th percentile?
4
Anonymous1h
Wait am I trippin? I’ve never measured but I’m short as hell and I feel like my back to knee is def longer than 28”
1
🥦
Anonymous1d
As unfortunate as it is, that free upgrade to a seat with more room would just be used by severely overweight people. I’d support it for tall people and tall people only.
-4
Anonymous#321h
“people who adhere to the dominant culture’s beauty norms deserve more rights”
1
Anonymous#720h
I don’t think people who are severely overweight are thinking of the societal “repercussions” of their actions lol
Most people who are severely overweight just have an ED of some kind outside of some extreme cases
0
Anonymous#820h
To clarify I disagree with #3 because that claim of theirs is rather dumb
0
🥦
Anonymous#716h
Just say you’re overweight.
0
Anonymous#37h
i’m unfortunately underweight but trying to get better. not that it’s any of your business :)
1
Anonymous#91h
Some people can have longer torso’s and some people can have longer legs. Another reason why being over 6’3 shouldn’t be considered a disability for accommodation bc this is a problem anyone can have depending on their anatomy