
What is that to say? That sort of whimsy. That âkind of whimsy.â The whimsy of that sort. The whimsy of what? The whimsy of a film? Thatâs an adjective. Youâre talking about the features of that film. Thatâs an adjective. The whimsy of that girl? The what? The kind of description of that girl. Adjective
Not trying to talk down to people, just observing the state of American English education. I donât mind people breaking the rules of academic English in general, but I think they should know them in the first place before they break them to ensure effective communication when required. This is a relatively minor example of an overall trend
This particular example is also not just a boy academic English, but every dialect of English Iâm aware of (which is certainly not all of them). âAinâtâ for example is perfectly grammatically correct in everything but academic English â whimsy being used as an adjective isnât in any dialect afaik.
Itâs not a trend. Education is not moving backwards, the economy is not shit, the world is not ending. Ever since the dawn of time, people have been saying that the world is on the brink. Itâs a mortal obsession. But you need to stop twisting things just to match that interpretation. People can speak and read just fine, and the people who are wrong here know how to use the word whimsy. They simply arenât categorizing the words correctly. Itâs completely useless knowledge unless youâre an English
American math and reading test scores have fallen in the last decade (aka a trend!). That is a fact, not an opinion. Teachers have been anecdotally noting a decline in reading and writing abilities of their students as well since about the pandemic. The state of our education is certainly better than it was a hundred years ago, but statistically worse than it was ten years ago. Look up Stanford Educational Opportunity Project for the stats.
Has there ever been a decade when teachers didnât claim reading and writing were declining? I recall an old note in a stone tablet a thousand years ago where a professor complains that students no longer know how to write on tablets because of this new âpaperâ shit. Old people always complain that the youth are getting dumber and young people always complain that old people are out of touch. And as for test scores, thatâs likely because of a temporary surge in long-distance learning
No it suggests that they donât understand the difference between a noun and an adjective. Thatâs not critical thinking, thatâs knowledge you get from hearing about nouns vs adjectives. Itâs not useful. The only reason youâre acting like it is is because you want to act like youâre smarter than everyone else. I got the answer correct right away. Iâm not being a dick about it. Learn something from that
Wdym itâs not useful itâs literally like. The building blocks of any language. It determines the order of words in a sentence to convey meaning. You may not actively think about it everyday but that doesnât mean it isnât important to be able to distinguish. You might not have to count to ten everyday but itâs important to know the order of numbers.
Bro ur literally on here crying about how everyone is dumber than you because they donât know about some piece of English semantics. Anyone could fail a question like that it doesnât make them stupid. Is that seriously the only form of validation you have in your life? The fact that you know answers to useless questions?
I GOT IT RIGHT. Go look at my earlier comments. You donât learn to speak in school you learn to speak from hearing others. Your brain knows the language pattern. This does not reflect on anyoneâs ability to read, write, or speak at a college level and you know it. Itâs completely useless information. Itâs just a category conceptualized centuries after modern English became widely spoken for dictation purposes
*speaking* is intuitive but this is the first thing you learn when learning to write. Like literally the first thing is subject and verb. It is how the conventions of written language were established. It is how we are able to be having this argument. And yes, language skills are vital to the development of critical thinking skills, itâs why peasants were kept largely illiterate. Itâs why it was illegal to teach enslaved black people to read in the pre civil war south.
No peasants were kept illiterate because schools cost money and resources. Reading is usefull, but every single person here can read and write at a college level despite not know that whimsy is a noun. Your brain knows how English works. This is a stupid fun fact that you are using to insult others. You should genuinely be embarrassed
I feel like folks are being way too extreme/ad hominem here (directed at everyone, not any one person in particular). I think it matters more than #6 does, and less than #5/10. But not knowing a singular fact doesnât make anybody stupid (perhaps uneducated, depending on the fact), and neither does whether or not you believe itâs important to know said fact. I feel like we should be able to talk about such things without dissolving into personal attacks.
I actually understand and agree to some extent of #6's point that it's possible to be successful without being able to identify parts of speech, but i also before that parts of speech is so core and foundational to the education system that not understanding it would signify you aren't paying attention and building an understanding in school; rather, you are going off of intuition, more akin to regurgitation.