
A junior psych major was assigned a psych article on the way bullying and gender identity impact mental health. She handed in a 650 wd essay that doesn’t reference the article at all and had no citations, in which she states her own opinions that 1) a little bit of “teasing” is ok to reinforce “natural” gender roles and 2) believing that there are more than two genders is “demonic”. I’m not directly quoting but those are the words she used. She references the Bible but made no actual citations.
The TA who was teaching the course (who is trans) gave the paper a 0/25 with a very clear explanation as to why - she stated that the student could express her opinions but that she needed to actually reference the article and provide better evidence to make an informed, academic opinion. The faculty professor supported the TA’s decision, and then the student went to TPUSA to make it public. IMO, it was an intentional set up to gain publicity. She’s a junior, she should know better.
She does not cite the article she’s meant to be responding to once, there’s no evidence that she even read the article. I used page count as an estimation of word count because I’ve been in a writing heavy field for years. She makes very vague references, no quotes, no citations, no evidence aside from “the Bible says [her belief]”. As a junior in psychology she displays a stunning lack of understanding for the sources and evidence required for this assignment. ChatGPT would’ve done a better job
Dude did you report the correct fucking link? lol anyway. To anyone wondering where it went I’d responded with a link that actually worked to the same article hosted through yahoo news, it was taken down maybe for having her name included but there was no actual guard rail given as to why it was removed
Yeah, she references things but does not cite them. References the bible, “In Genesis, it says-“ but does not actually cite where in Genesis in fact, what she said about Genesis is not actually really in there. Barely referenced, and not properly cited. Points off. This reaction paper (meant to be primarily opinions based) does roughly what was needed to be done minus the fact that she did not cite sources (which, I said) and also wrote it very poorly.
I’m citing the instagram account that posted the entire paper, with notes from her professor who graded it and the other professor for the course who agreed with the grade, and the requirements she was meant to follow. Which, just so happens to have a biased caption (which i do not agree with), that is free to view, and also, easier to look up. ;)
Tbh, probably not a zero in oklahoma, with it being ranked 48th or less in education among the US lol. Anywho, the professor who graded it did not say she was getting a zero due to lack of citations therefore plagiarism. She at least partially answered the question, she could have gotten some points. She was not off topic and a flat zero is petty.
Omg yess finally someone with a brain. I feel like no one has been logical about this like, a bad grade, YES! It's a bad paper, but a 0 means something more. I'm a total lefty and I disagree with just about everything she said but it didn't deserve a zero. A 50% is a little high maybe but anything that is an F but not a zero makes more sense.
Real. Either this prof was biased or an extremely harsh grader, either way I don’t like it lol. I mean, NO points? For completing the assignment? That follows the word count? That has opinions in it? That at least partly completes the assignment? Who do you think you are!! #powertrip