Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Those of you who are against the Cornell 7, do you now support ICE detaining men who are sexual predators?
#poll
Yes
No
I'm not against the Cornell men
290 votes
upvote 13 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 13h

before ICE started in 2002, people were deported for crimes like that so it's still abolish ICE.

upvote 50 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13h

Only ~5% of people detained by ICE have been convicted of a violent crime. There’s no equivalence here

upvote 50 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10h

This is a loaded question bcs I don’t think ICE should exist, but since they already do, might as well. Realistically tho 4 of those dudes were white so ICE prob wouldn’t touch them anyway

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12h

She didn’t the victim in question literally sign a letter to police initially admitting the sex was consensual?

upvote -15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13h

~70-73% have no criminal convictions whatsoever

upvote 38 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 12h

19 year old incurring severe psychological trauma displaying fawn/trauma bonding behaviors as a coping mechanism after taking a potent dissociative drug You act like you’re brave for displaying “the facts” but you actually don’t know fuck all about anything

upvote 34 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12h

The facts are her entire story now is entirely different than what she originally told both the police and the college administration on the record. There are glaring undeniable inconsistencies in her story and it’s pretty interesting this is only occurring now that she’s looking for money and the lawyers got involved after the fact. This seems like a blatant me too witch hunt where feelings and vibes matter more than the actual facts or the lives of the innocent young men Involved.

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11h

Brother, you don’t know “the facts.” You weren’t there, you’re not a professional prosecutor, you’re not a judge. Stop pretending like you know anything about the situation, anything about psychological trauma after rape, anything about the relevant laws, anything about the standards of proof for these types of charges.

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11h

The facts are that she’s a 19 year old who took a potent dissociative drug and experienced severe trauma then made statements as she was actively recovering from using that drug. The fact that you think someone in that scenario would make clear and coherent statements is honestly insane. That’s the real witch hunt if anything

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4h

U can’t give consent doped

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2h

She was on ketamine bro, you can’t consent while under the influence of that drug

upvote 13 downvote