Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
is having no pronouns in bio a red flag?
#poll
RED FLAG ❌
NO 🤷
idk depends
568 votes
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

i personally say no bc idgaf

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Green flag

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

No bc your pronouns should be pretty obvious from your posts

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

pls explain ur answers! why is it a red flag?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Chat did #3 just get banned 😭 I promise I didn’t report you fam get well soon

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

It's a nothing flag either way imo. People can express their gender identity in whatever way they want and I'd rather not to make any deeper judgments about them as a person for it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 15w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

No. I don’t understand why ppl care so much abt them. Whether someone has them in their bio or not. Mind you, most people did not gaf until a few years ago

post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

I voted red flag cuz I meant it’s a red flag to have pronouns in your bio

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 15w

lmfao my feelings tbh

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Ehhhh I agree with OP that it isn’t a red flag to not have them, but it definitely doesn’t make it a green flag to not have them. The argument for saying your pronouns is, as you said, to be inclusive of trans people, and remove assumption from gender identities. You don’t need to be virtue signaling to genuinely want that. Even if I personally don’t care too much.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 15w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Well, as I said I don’t mind either way, but again the argument is that you’re NORMALIZING the use of introducing yourself with pronouns. This can be done out of straight up kindness, not just virtue signaling. Also, I understand your point abt trans people being a small portion of the population, but in a way, don’t you think it’s a bit discriminating? Do a bit of thinking on your own there, and you can get back to me. But again to clarify I literally don’t gaf about pronouns in bio

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

The overall argument is that introducing yourself with pronouns is more inclusive to everyone. Gender and sex aren’t the same, so making assumptions off one’s appearance can be poor practice. Especially when feminine-passing men and masculine-passing women exist outside of transgenderism

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 15w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 15w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

I did a little bit of thinking, and I don’t agree. You listed a ton of physical, visible, and pretty much set in stone characteristics. Gender is not that—gender is fluid. Gender and sex are not the same thing, so making an assumption of someone’s gender off of their sex is argued to be “poor practice”. Do you have an argument against that?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

Also, I think you’re ignoring my main point. The point of including pronouns in bio is to create an environment where people don’t just assume everyone’s gender. If only transgender people did it, then it wouldn’t become a societal topic, and it wouldn’t ever matter. It’s the same way that we as a society now put “gay” or “straight” or “bisexual” or whatever on dating profiles. I don’t see how it’s any different than that.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

#3, i agree. pronouns in bio is pointless most of the time

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

Oh and by the way, I’m only making this argument because you in your original post reductively dismissed most people to have their pronouns in bio as “virtue signaling”. I don’t think something as simple as pronouns in bio can be a red flag universally for non trans people

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

OP #3’s argument isn’t that they’re useless, it’s that they’re a RED FLAG most of the time. My stance is that they’re neutral-positive societally. Just so you know.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

But I’ll respond to your last point: Fam I’m seeing your point, but you’re missing MY point 😭 pretty please read carefully and try to level with me here: My point is that, by normalizing having pronouns in bio, we help create a more inclusive society. Like how forms allow homosexuality as an option as opposed to just heterosexuality and “other” The idea is to not have a group feel marginalized in every social interaction because our current society isn’t built to handle them well

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 15w

This argument has been used all throughout history. Lemme show you this argument in its worst case: Replace “pronouns in bio” with “black people given rights”, and this statement looks way more discriminatory, right? I’m not equating these two, I’m just showing a “worst case” of this train of thought based on history

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

Like my point is people used this argument in the civil rights era

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15w

Dude, all I said was I don’t have an issue with them. You’re talking abt a whole lotta nothing. I’m not reading all of that

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 15w

even bringing up civil rights is actually making me cry with laughter

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 15w

No you said “mind you, most people did not gaf until a few years ago” You can apply this argument to the civil rights era. That’s all I’M claiming.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

Fam I specifically said I’m not equating the two ideas. They both just follow a similar line of logic. I dunno about you, but as a black person, I’m not one to argue which minority struggles the most

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

No literally because what are they talking about???😭😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

I don’t like being called a cis person call me normal …. Tf I’m just a person, woman, daughter take cis out tf I’m a WOMAN

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 15w

agreed

upvote 1 downvote