Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

this means there is higher probability that the balls experiences deflation beyond natural circumstances than not

-1

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

we can finally agree on smthing

0

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

Permeation of air through a ball also has nothing to do with the ideal gas law

6

Anonymous OP 2w

A temp difference doesn’t do that much either

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

permeation itself is a diffusion/materials process, not the Ideal Gas Law once air leaks out, the Ideal Gas Law does determine how the ball’s pressure drops, since losing gas (n) directly lowers pressure (P). bro skipped chem

0

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

Well the temp lowering would cause the oxygen to shrink essentially dropping the PSI it’s not air leaking out

1

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

My guy, I’m a ChemEng major. Fair, that reducing amount of gas reduces pressure, I figured that was basic enough to not bring up, I was talking about temperature change

6

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

You’re phrasing is a little wrong but I largely agree.

5

Anonymous OP 2w

read the report gang they did the simulations and any engineering student knows atleast that in any experiment when u control for all errors you can deduce a probability of a measurement or a statistic being true over repeated trials and the Wells report says that the pressure difference is beyond normal temperature caused differences

0

Anonymous OP 2w

My fluids prof was god awful so from what I understand is when it gets colder the molecules of air in stuff slow down bouncing around far less than they normally do therefore creating less pressure

6

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

Yeah, that’s very much right

1

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

I have read the report. It showed the possibility of no interference. Especially with the gauge-use uncertainty and relative unfamiliarity with the locker room/ball conditions.

3

Anonymous OP 2w

Something I am an expert in is cold being from a place that gets 200+ inches of snow a year and unless there’s a 20+ degree change the ball firmness doesnt change much and know Kraft and belichick im more inclined to believe they’re cheating

0

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

There was a more than 20 degree change my guy. It was foxborough in January

5

Anonymous OP 2w

even after the gauge uncertainties there is a higher probability of stuff not explained by weather and normal fluctuation

0

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

That’s not an acceptable burden of proof. The weakest burden of proof that would apply here is “by a preponderance of the evidence” which I would say this doesn’t meet.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

the burden of evidence is on the patriots organization to explain the discrepancy beyond natural events pls use ur brain

-1

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

That’s… not how anything works? The onus is always on the accuser. Cmon man, take a civics class

4

Anonymous OP 2w

Those stadiums never get that warm from the place it was pumped up to the outside it more than likely wasn’t a 20+ degree difference

0

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

Yeah I mean hard disagree, but that’s ok

5

Anonymous OP 2w

the report says more probable than not so you are deadass arguing with math

0

Anonymous qbhatetrain 2w

“More probable than not” is not a normal standard of evidence and that combined with statements like “Brady was probably at least generally aware” in the Wells Report make it gobbledygook with no firm substance. It literally sounds like people trying to avoid questions at a press conference by putting a million qualifiers on statements they know to be false.

1

Anonymous .mouse.. 2w

It was in the 30s on the field and the balls were filled in an interior equipment room that had to have at least been in the 60s. They don’t fill balls in the breezeway or something bro.

1