in the original post

-4

Yeah motherfucker, this was originally a yards per game ranking, and then you changed it. The seahawks have a better ppg.

16

Anonymous #1 1w

My point was ypg is a stupid metric when we are interested in what team is better at scoring points

-4

Anonymous qbhatetrain 1w

You never once said that. So it was your point in the same way Trump declassified this documents.

10

Anonymous #2 1w

The Seahawks averaged 34.0 PPG vs common opponents while the Patriots averaged 27.3 PPG — a difference of about 6.7 points per game.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Additionally combined with Seahawks also facing harder opponents across other teams this suggests they are the better offensive team and the New England fraudsters are abt to receive a belt

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

I changed the argument with the points differential then another dude said pats are better than Seahawks in terms of point in responding to that I do not give a fuck abt ypg im not talking abt that

-3

Anonymous qbhatetrain 1w

Ok. But you joined a ypg conversation.

8

Anonymous #1 1w

yeah but I hijacked it to make my point bc I think my ppg argument is better

-3

Anonymous qbhatetrain 1w

See my above statement about “your point”

7

Anonymous #1 1w

ok thanks for agreeing with the fact??

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Yeah ypg was the same as ppg is the second post about whole team offensive stats. Seattle is 3 ppg and ne is 2. Ne is better than Seattle in ypg offense. The point stands no matter how you look at it so why does it matter what it becomes later on in the argument?

1