Anonymous #2 10w

You the one who posted that ai video?

5

Anonymous #1 10w

"AI video" you mean video about AI?

-2

Anonymous #1 10w

You realize "AI" is not a monolith right? You're describing a very specific instance of AI like it represents the entire class of technology. That's misinformation.

-3

Anonymous #1 10w

Or i guess not you but rather the person you're defending

0

Anonymous #2 10w

You’re being necessarily pedantic

6

Anonymous #1 10w

Downvote and slander but no substance... classic

-4

Anonymous #1 10w

There's a huge difference between sora slop and drug discovery. This is not pedantic you need to be SPECIFIC when you're talking about AI. The least you could do is say corporate LLMs when you're talking about chatgpt. The specifics are so fucking important

-3

Anonymous #1 10w

If you wanna look at the statistics you'll realize that streaming video including short form social media uses WAYYYY more energy than LLMs. And if you wanna look at resource consumption, gasoline and red meat are much bigger problems than any datacenter. The capitalist overlords want you arguing a brick wall position they know you can't win so they aren't threatened by actual accountability. They need you scared and angry at scapegoats so they can keep doing their thing. Please wake up

-1

Anonymous #2 10w

Everyone knows what we mean by AI. It is an unnecessary discrepancies

5

Anonymous #1 10w

Banning AI is an impossible goal. Regulating centralized corporate compute aka datacenters is a MUCH more realistic goal. We need to be strategic, not loose cannons.

0

Anonymous #1 10w

It's really not... this is literally where the entire bread and butter of AI ethics are and want to write the whole thing off as pedantic. Be brave and think about the things that scare you.

-2

Anonymous #1 10w

Are you even hearing what I'm saying?

-2

Anonymous #1 10w

Don't be afraid to ask questions. Confusion is not a reason to be upset and downvoting. What's not clicking? You say "everyone knows what we mean by AI" but semantically that's impossible because "AI" fundamentally doesn't mean one thing. Using the term as a monolith is fundamentally discrepant. That's just a fact, because again, generative drug discovery using lab grade neural networks is very different from generative slop made with d-tier consumer grade infrastructure, despite both being "AI"

-1

Anonymous #1 10w

I've been studying this for longer than consumer grade AI ever existed btw. If something is not adding up, I promise you it's because you're not fully understanding what I'm getting at. You don't even seem to understand what you mean when you say "AI" so how can everyone know? That's not how human knowledge works.

0

Anonymous #1 10w

Dude was being so incredibly annoying had to block them. Like they’re just talking to hear themselves talk at this point 😭😭😭

5

Anonymous #1 10w

Also the most annoying part is this is directly referencing a post where a ChatGPT group is circled in the picture like we are obviously referring to ChatGPT type of AI. Like talking about nuance maybe we look at the obvious context lol sorry you had to deal with that bs

3

Anonymous OP 10w

Just let him talk it’s whatever lmao

3