Neurodivergent on Sidechat | I think we are also not talking enough about how the Epstein eating babies conspiracy is just the Blood Libel. Like he was evil as were all of his associates we don’t need to peddle in antisemitism to prove that

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Neurodivergent 1w

I think we are also not talking enough about how the Epstein eating babies conspiracy is just the Blood Libel. Like he was evil as were all of his associates we don’t need to peddle in antisemitism to prove that

Neurodivergent 1w

you are actually helping to discredit victims when you say absurd unsubstantiated things like this. the actual crimes are more than evil enough, we don’t have to make stuff up here to add to it.

Anonymous 1w

What does this have to do with neurodivergence? /gen

Anonymous 1w

There was actual cannibalism in the files tho????

Anonymous 6d

Yeah this has nothing to do with blood Libel, they just had cannibalism in the files and nothing in the files has to do with his religion only his actions, what he did only relates to his wealth and network not his race or identity.

Anonymous

#2 6d

There was none in the correspondences and there’s a reason there are no credible sources promoting this either. It comes from a woman who was spreading Q-anon-related conspiracies during a psychiatric break. I have no problem believing Epstein and Co are monsters who abused and caused the death of children but this lacks credible evidence

Anonymous

#3 6d

As said above, it isn’t actually in his correspondences or anything. Jews eating babies is absolutely a blood libel thing, there’s a reason right wing conspiracists are repeating it so much.

Anonymous

OP 6d

If you can provide actual specific proof from the files I’m happy to change my mind, but there isn’t any. And frankly it’s an accusation that doesn’t really make sense on a lot of levels either beyond the Blood libel legacy and shock value. Again, he’s evil and did horrible things, but there’s no real evidence of this one

Anonymous

#1 6d

Honestly valid. I put it here bc I was replying to a chain of like 3 posts in this group

Anonymous

OP 6d

Fair enough!

Anonymous

OP 6d

https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00147661.pdf

Anonymous

#3 6d

I know it’s a witness account but why would they lie at this level? I’m much more tempted to believe victims until they’re disproven…

Anonymous

#3 6d

Genuinely I don’t even think this is a person lying per se, she was having a psychotic break. This is like bohemian grove/lizard people/qanon conspiracy stuff. This person was checked into residential care for a psychiatric outburst that also included unfounded conspiracies.

Anonymous

OP 6d

It also basically follows conspiracy and blood libel tropes to a T. It’s really clearly informed by online conspiracy culture and antisemitic rhetoric. Like the kind of rhetoric the Jan 6 people who were talking about “adrenochrome” harvesting were repeating. Applying critical thought to conspiracy rhetoric isn’t dismissing the fact that these people were monsters and lead to the deaths of many women and girls.

Anonymous

OP 6d

There’s a clear difference between calling a claim by a witness an anti-Semitic blood libel trope and applying critical thinking to it, I just think at this point until more evidence comes out you can’t claim either side is right but you definitely cannot throw it out.. also downvoting my link is crazy work ngl