
All the “advantages” are ultimately neutral traits. Hyperfixations, getting shit done during hypomania, special interests, anxiety protecting you, all of these things also come with downsides. They’re still disabilities at the end of the day, and for some they would still be disabled even in a perfect society geared toward our diverse experiences. It’s important to acknowledge that.
"My adhd has caused me so much suffering" okay and my audhd has caused me much worse suffering and trauma than the average person and I still found an empirical silver lining. This narrative that there is nothing good at all about neurodivergence belongs to ableist ideals embedded deeply in our systems.
God I hate talking to people who are still in the larval stage of understanding their neurodivergence especially when they latch onto that facet of their identity and then think they know everything and then talk down to people with more years of active insight when all they're trying to do is keep the facts straight. That shit is like babysitting someone else's neglected child
It's like most people don't realize how superficial and stereotyped mainstream coverage of neurodivergence is and so when they get their diagnosis, suddenly it's their whole identity and they internalize all the bad/misguided mentalities surrounding neurodivergence. It's especially frustrating to witness having been diagnosed 18 years ago at the age of 4, since I never had a phase like that because I learned my neurodivergence very early on through the medical lens thanks to my physician mother.
I think you’ve internalized the idea that disability is wrong tbh. I have multiple neurodivergent diagnoses (remember, neurodivergent includes every kind of mental disorder, not just adhd & autism) and consider most of them disabling without many true upsides. For example, my OCD would still disable me even if i was perfectly accommodated for it. It would still fuck me over and I’ve yet to find an upside.
No, I very firmly believe there is no way for neurodivergence to be wrong. It's natural. I believe this so firmly that I don't like the word disability as a label for the condition. My issue is with the linguistic and structural context of the word "disability" because I think it mischaracterizes a lot of what neurodivergence is.
I've always had obsessive-compulsive tendencies and obviously that comes with overworking myself excruciatingly on tiny details but when I channel it this becomes my greatest strength as a multidisciplinary artist. I am immensely detail oriented and that's how I manage to consistently reach the depth I do. I would not be able to create work at the level of quality I create if it were not for my OCD
You do not understand how able I have to be in order to move these mountains I've been moving. You do not understand how much will it takes to know what I'm up against in life and still stay true to myself. You do not understand how much strength it takes to sustainably subvert what's normal and do it with full and authentic integrity.
You do not know what it's like to feel society's immune response arising from within you and being told you're broken for it. I'm not less abled, I'm differently abled. My neurodivergent shortcomings come along with near inconceivable strengths that would not be refined and powerful the way they are if it had not been for my neurodivergence.
Its cool you have the kind of OCD with benefits, but in order to qualify to have the disorder it means you struggle. I’m sorry but mental illness is not like other oppressed groups. The main qualification is the fact you struggle. I have OCD that doesn’t make me a perfectionist but rather obsessive over how I’m viewed. It has never improved anything and only made the way I’m viewed worse. And no societal change would erase that problem. Sure, societal change could help. But there is no upside to
Nope, you still don't get it. I have never said there's anything wrong with struggling in fact I'd argue struggling is so important for growth that medication should be saved as a last resort. Do you not understand what I mean when I say channeled? I used to struggle immensely and still do from time to time, and worrying about how I'm viewed is HUGE part of it but you know what I did? I took on makeup and fashion design as a hobby to CHANNEL what's natural within me towards healthy outlets.
You have an allergy to the word that describes the struggle. Disability simply means you struggle. There is no “less than” in that word. Only struggle. Some disabilities can be overcome or managed. You seem to have succeeded at managing and overcoming your disabilities, due to your struggling->succeeding journey. Congratulations, I’m happy for you.
It also makes me sad because I can see my peers squandering their own potential when I know they have more within them. Where the mind goes the feet follow. A closed mind builds its own cage, an open mind unlocks its own sky. Whether you say you can or cannot, you are right. And I see people saying with their words that they are less able to which I have learned to say different but never less. Is that really so hard to understand?
Disability is an umbrella term. There is less able (but still able) at whatever the disability is. And there is completely unable at whatever the disability is (such as paralyzed people being unable to move their paralyzed parts). I agree most mental disabilities are simply less able (you can overcome, accommodate, manage, etc) and there are a lot of nd folks who are doomers and think they’re completely incapable when they’re not.
but you shouldn’t HAVE to exert that much effort just to achieve what’s normal for everyone else. and it’s okay to believe that you’re differently abled instead of disabled but when these different abilities make you need to put this much effort forth just to achieve what’s easy for others, then that’s a disability. and your difference definitely doesn’t make you lesser in any way or deficient in a way that’s a moral failing, but you need to acknowledge that it’s a very real disadvantage
i for sure agree with the first part, but what makes it a disability is that society is set up in a way where people like us have to do 5x as much work for half the result. there are a lot of things that in a vacuum wouldn’t necessarily be a huge disability, but they are because of the context surrounding them and the world we live in
Okay, so I mostly agree with you. But the people who are not only functionally disabled are worthy too. I know you probably didn’t mean they’re not, but it’s still important to acknowledge that. I wish we lived in a world where people communicated directly all the time, in both sign and spoken language, meds didn’t cost money, and productivity wasn’t your main measure of worth, but since we don’t live in that society some people struggle more than they would otherwise.
When I say functionally disabled, I mean anyone who has an impairment that causes struggling with everyday life. You even said the struggle is part of the definition. If we were living in a society that centers life and creation rather than centering hierarchy and power, we could easily accommodate all needs practically and technologically just by changing how we think about and structure the distribution of and access to resources, and prevent excess struggling in the first place.
Just by a change of mentality and social structure can make it so nobody is truly disabled in practice. That reality is completely possible. That's why I don't like to accept the word disability as a defining trait of the individual. It's definition also comes from its context, as we've established
And right now I'm seeing a context where power is extremely unbalanced and vulnerable people are left to suffer with half baked treatments like medication with no integrative practice or support and industrialized culture surrounding mental wellbeing almost completely devoid of self connection. Our systems are largely optimized for profits and deconstructing hierarchal structures into web like structures is the opposite of profitable. Thanks capitalism!