Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Watching the Odyssey as Homer intended
711 upvotes, 16 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in Movies. "Watching the Odyssey as Homer intended"
upvote 711 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Im not one of those everything is woke propaganda people, but I gave the movie a chance I fell asleep around the 30 minute mark I’m sorry it was just boring to me lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

It's just a damned shame that "honoring the artist's intended medium" NEVER applies to reading the book...

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

It wasn’t a book, it was an epic written to be performed on stage over multiple acts

upvote 35 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Have you read the book? It’s not even meant to be read it reads like a stage production. Oh you probably got the shitty translations that changes the format of it completely against “honoring the artists intended medium”

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Not true by the way. The Odyssey and Iliad are poems meant to be sung aloud by bards at feasts (like Travis Scott in the movie). They were developed orally over centuries before being written down, as the Greeks had lost their writing system and didnt have one until the archaic period.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

It does not read like a stage production. Its a poem. Maybe go read it.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 8w

I thought it had many, many issues, none of which were the casting or historical accuracy. 6/10

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8w

That’s completely fine!!

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 8w

I have. I read it in high school, then reread it when they announced the movie. It reads like both. Because it was poems that were performed. I’m agreeing with you babes why are you such a snob?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

Its wasn’t performed tho. At no point were actors performing it. Perhaps a bard gave a dramatic oration, but at no point were multiple actors saying lines or anything of that nature.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8w

Yeah. Either it was just rly bland OR Nolan (or someone else) thinks more movies will be made on classics, so they purposely made a decently accurate but boring first take so that the masses are introduced to the story, but future movie makers can take more liberties.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 8w

The masses were already aware of the story. It’s probably the most well known story in the history of the world second only to the bible. I think this was just a standalone attempt at trying to make an epic and it fell flat

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8w

Yeah I agree that most people would know the stories… I’m just grasping at ideas for how in the world such a nothing-burger movie was made at the expense of so much money, time, and hype. - the dialogue was cliche and inconsistent in which era it represented - the were motifs repetitive, shallow, and borderline cringey like the bow pluck sound - somebody messed up the logic in some scenes (Circe tells the men to go back from pigs into their human disguises; yet Odysseus kills a deer that then..

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 8w

turned into a man when dead (implying a change from disguise to true self). So which is it? The animals are the true selves or the men? Btw, Circe doesn’t say the “back to your disguises” thing in the original. - and finally, there were only maaaybe 3 moments that communicated something real beyond the battles and basics.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 8w

I didn’t say it was acted out, I said performed which yes, in this case means sung/chanted by a lone performer, often with someone else keeping the beat with a staff for them. I took 2 semesters(at my cc) on homers Iliad and odyssey respectively. That’s why I said epic and not play

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 8w

A performance means many things, including singing, not just acting

upvote 5 downvote