I wouldn’t say I refuse to watch Charlie Chaplin movies, but I’m really not interested in seeing them. I feel like since the filmmaking is so outdated the movies won’t be very worthwhile.
It’s so strange that his movies have like a 4.3 on Letterboxd just because they’re classics and Chaplin’s an icon and all, but y’all should just be honest about movies you like and don’t like
1
Anonymous10w
buster keaton is much more entertaining imo. sherlock jr genuinely holds up. i’m still fascinated by how he managed to do some of it
1
Anonymous10w
Watch the kid chaplin, its only an hour long and although you might think you wont enjoy him that can help you determine really
1
AnonymousOP10w
Are you shocked to learn people like different things than you
1
AnonymousOP10w
the people that watch them tend to be into that stuff, and people that wouldnt never watch it
4
Anonymous#210w
Yeah but that’s probably only compelling because it’s old. I don’t wanna watch something because it’s old. I wanna watch something because it’s good.
1
AnonymousOP10w
it being old adds something to the fascination, but it’s not just that, at least for me. he’s genuinely just so creative. and sherlock jr is 49 min and fast paced.