Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
People will talk day and night about how Rose was the real Titanic villain while completely giving this mass murdering piece of SHIT a pass
15 upvotes, 16 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in Movies. "People will talk day and night about how Rose was the real Titanic villain while completely giving this mass murdering piece of SHIT a pass"
upvote 15 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

Edward Smith did next to nothing by wrong, and his depiction in the movie was almost as slanderous as Lieutenant William Murdoch’s.

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

The iceberg was the real villain

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Murdoch did nothing wrong but Smith really did cancel lifeboat drills and then drive the ship full speed through a known ice field, killing over 1,500 people.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

According to Lookout Archie Jewell, the lifeboat drills were cancelled owing to inclement weather and the fact that they had already done drills in Southhampton. As for driving the ship at high speed, that was because that was standard practice for Ocean Liners at the time, and was moreso a fault of the Liner industry as a whole rather than this specific Captain.

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

The weather was fine. Smith just wanted to murder people. Bandwagon fallacy on the speed. Stanley Lord was 10 miles away with the Californian. Did he sail his ship at full speed through the same ice field? No, he stopped it because he isn’t fucking Hitler like Smith was.

post
upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Again, the weather was not fine, per Archie Jewell’s testimony. British Wreck Commissioner’s Inquiry Day 2 questions 273-280. https://www.titanicinquiry.org/BOTInq/BOTInq02Jewell02.php In addition, SS Amerika travelled at 18 knots, Carpathia at 17, RMS Baltic at 18, and SS Noodham at its full speed. Californian is the exception, not the rule, which only proves my point further. Also, comparing Smith to Hitler? Jesus Christ talk about a disingenuous comparison.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

You’re literally citing an accomplice to murder. In any case, several days into a voyage is far too late to begin drilling to use lifeboats (the land drills were obviously worthless considering how unprepared the crew was). And you’re STILL using the bandwagon fallacy. You should have grown out of thinking popular things are automatically correct if you’re old enough to be on this app. And there is literally nothing disingenuous about comparing one mass murdering piece of human garbage to

post
upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

another.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

An accomplice to murder? At this point I’m genuinely questioning whether this is ragebait or not, no, the 23 year old lookout who wasn’t even on duty at the time they struck the iceberg wasn’t an ‘accomplice to murder’. It’s not bandwagoning because again, this was standard practice. Literally every Captain (save for Shackleton) questioned as part of the inquiry said they would have done the same thing as Smith. It is absurd to claim he’s comparable to a man who willfully exterminated millions.

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

“It’s not bandwagoning because it’s the [literal definition of bandwagon fallacy].” Bro what the fuck are you even doing? Just because lots of captains were okay with committing mass murder doesn’t make it right. Not everything that is popular is valid. I’m considering reporting you because there is almost no way this actually news to anyone aged 18 or older. Either that or you’re just parroting what you read on wikipedia without giving any critical thought to it.

post
upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Smith willingly murdered 1500 people. Are you seriously quibbling with exactly how many people he mass murdered? Is ONE murder not enough to make someone a piece of shit? How many people would he have to wipe out before it’s enough for you?

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Hey, so posting that image over and over again isn’t going to make you right. To phrase it another way, you seem to be making the argument that either he was willfully trying to murder as many people as possible (for which there is literally no evidence) or that he was negligent/reckless. Except he wasn’t negligent because negligence requires one to act in a way contrary to how a reasonable person would. Since every other Liner Captain interviewed said they would do the same, it cannot be

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Described as negligent. Also yeah, please, feel free to report me for breaking literally zero rules I guess lmao.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Smith ‘willingly’ did literally nothing. At ABSOLUTE MOST you argue involuntary manslaughter. There is absolutely no evidence to demonstrate any form of predication in the Titanic unless you’re a total crackpot conspiracy theorist, though that wouldn’t surprise me very much lol.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10h

Holy shit just admit you can’t allow yourself to be wrong because you’re insecure you FUCKING VIRGIN 😭😭😭😭

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8h

Yeah this isn’t what the bandwagon is lil guy “Everyone does this so we should do it too!!” is bandwagon fallacy “This guy was following the standard practice of the time and didn’t behave negligently” is not bandwagon fallacy

upvote 4 downvote